Cited by 34Child Nutrition and Water AccessMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementWaste Management and Recycling

Piloting a low-cost hardware intervention to reduce improper disposal of solid waste in communal toilets in low-income settlements in Dhaka, Bangladesh

Open access
Yeasmin, Farzana, Luby, Stephen P., Saxton, Ronald E., Nizame, Fosiul A., Alam, Mahbub-Ul, Dutta, Notan Chandra, Masud, Abdullah-Al, Yeasmin, Dalia +5 more·2017·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bangladesh faces daunting challenges in addressing the sanitation needs of its urban poor. Maintaining the cleanliness and functionality of communal toilets is dependent upon periodic emptying of fecal sludge, and cooperation between users of communal toilets. Trash disposal into latrines can block the outflow pipes, rendering the toilets non-functional. METHODS: Pre-intervention: We conducted in-depth interviews with five operators of fecal sludge emptying equipment and five adult residents who were also caregivers of children. We identified factors contributing to improper disposal of trash into communal toilets, a barrier to operation of the equipment, in low-income communities of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Intervention design: We developed behavior change communication materials to discourage waste disposal in toilets, and promote use of waste bins. We conducted six focus group discussions with adult male, female, landlord and children to select the preferred design for waste bins to be placed inside toilets, and finalize communication materials. Post-intervention: We then pilot-tested an intervention package to promote appropriate trash disposal practices and thus facilitate periodic removal of fecal sludge when the latrine pits become full. We conducted 20 in-depth interviews and four focus group discussions with community residents, landlords and cleaners of communal toilets. RESULTS: Barriers to appropriate waste disposal included lack of private location for disposal of menstrual hygiene products, limited options for formal trash collection and disposal, and the use of plastic bags for disposing children's feces. A pilot intervention including behavior change communication and trash bins was implemented in two urban slum communities. Spot checks confirmed that the bins were in place and used. Respondents described positive improvements in the appearance of the toilet and surrounding environment. CONCLUSION: The current practice on the part of local residents of disposing of waste into toilets impedes the safe removal of fecal sludge and impairs toilet functionality. Residents reported positive changes in toilet cleanliness and usability resulting from this intervention, and this both improves the user experience with toilets, and also promotes the sustainability of the entrepreneurial model of Vacutug operators supported by WSUP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-017-4693-x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stigma actively prevents women and girls from developing healthy habits, such as using soap and water or using latrines.

    “Stigma actively prevents women and girls from developing healthy habits (e.g., using soap and water or from using latrines (O'Reilly and Louis, 2014; Yeasmin et al., 2017;Winter et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Bandura A: Social learning through imitation. In: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. edn. Edited by Jones MR. Oxford, UK: UNP; 1962: 211–274.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeasmin, F., Luby, S. P., Saxton, R. E., Nizame, F. A., Alam, M.-U., Dutta, N. C., Masud, A.-A., Yeasmin, D., Layden, A., Rahman, H., Abbott, R., Unicomb, L., & Winch, P. J.
Affiliations
  • International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (BD)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Water & Sanitation for the Urban Poor (GB)
Corresponding author
Yeasmin, Farzana
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2017-08-29
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
682-682
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2751928280
Cited by
34
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Water Sanitation for Urban Poor(WSUP)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
Keywords
low-income settlements, urban slums, behavior change communication, waste bins, menstrual products, sanitation, Dhaka
MeSH terms
Bangladesh, Environment, Health Education, Humans, Poverty Areas, Refuse Disposal, Sanitation, Toilet Facilities, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review