Cited by 21Wireless Power Transfer SystemsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Assessment of Electromagnetic Interference with Active Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) Caused by the Qi A13 Design Wireless Charging Board

Open access
Seckler, Tobias, Jagielski, Kai, Stunder, Dominik·2015·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Electromagnetic interference is a concern for people wearing cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The aim of this study was to assess the electromagnetic compatibility between CIEDs and the magnetic field of a common wireless charging technology. To do so the voltage induced in CIEDs by Qi A13 design magnetic fields were measured and compared with the performance limits set by ISO 14117. In order to carry this out a measuring circuit was developed which can be connected with unipolar or bipolar pacemaker leads. The measuring system was positioned at the four most common implantation sites in a torso phantom filled with physiological saline solution. The phantom was exposed by using Helmholtz coils from 5 µT to 27 µT with 111 kHz sine‑bursts or by using a Qi A13 design wireless charging board (Qi‑A13‑Board) in two operating modes “power transfer” and “pinging”. With the Helmholtz coils the lowest magnetic flux density at which the performance limit was exceeded is 11 µT. With the Qi‑A13‑Board in power transfer mode 10.8% and in pinging mode 45.7% (2.2% at 10 cm distance) of the performance limit were reached at maximum. In neither of the scrutinized cases, did the voltage induced by the Qi‑A13‑Board exceed the performance limits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph120605886

Cites

30 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wireless charging methods like inductive coupling can cause electromagnetic interference (EMI) with RF-based data transmission, disrupting communication integrity.

    “Wireless charging methods like inductive coupling, while efficient for power delivery, can cause electromagnetic interference (EMI) with RF-based data transmission, disrupting communication integrity (Seckler et al., 2015; Driessen et al., 2019; Nadeem et al., 2021).”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Seckler et al., 2015

    The Introduction (page not provided) says Qi charging uses inductive coupling and that its magnetic field can interfere with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by inducing voltages mistaken for cardiac signals. The paper does not report interference with RF-based data transmission or disrupted communication integrity; a search for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Seckler, T., Jagielski, K., & Stunder, D.
Affiliations
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Corresponding author
Seckler, Tobias
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2015-05-27
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
5886-5904
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129526957
Cited by
21
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ELARTU (Ternopil National Technical University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Keywords
electromagnetic interference, cardiac implantable electronic devices, wireless charging, electromagnetic compatibility, pacemaker leads, induced voltage, magnetic field exposure, Helmholtz coil, torso phantom
MeSH terms
Electromagnetic Fields, Equipment Design, Humans, Pacemaker, Artificial, Risk Assessment, Equipment Failure Analysis, Wireless Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review