Cited by 94Ethics and bioethics in healthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Big Data and Digitalization in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of the Ethical Issues

Open access
Favaretto, Maddalena, Shaw, David, De Clercq, Eva, Joda, Tim, Elger, Bernice Simone·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Big Data and Internet and Communication Technologies (ICT) are being increasingly implemented in the healthcare sector. Similarly, research in the field of dental medicine is exploring the potential beneficial uses of digital data both for dental practice and in research. As digitalization is raising numerous novel and unpredictable ethical challenges in the biomedical context, our purpose in this study is to map the debate on the currently discussed ethical issues in digital dentistry through a systematic review of the literature. Four databases (Web of Science, Pub Med, Scopus, and Cinahl) were systematically searched. The study results highlight how most of the issues discussed by the retrieved literature are in line with the ethical challenges that digital technologies are introducing in healthcare such as privacy, anonymity, security, and informed consent. In addition, image forgery aimed at scientific misconduct and insurance fraud was frequently reported, together with issues of online professionalism and commercial interests sought through digital means.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17072495

Cites

74 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When previous evidence suggests a new therapy is superior, it may not be ethically justifiable to expose patients to an older, potentially less effective standard treatment.

    “When previous evidence suggests a new therapy is superior, it may not be ethically justifiable to expose patients to an older, potentially less effective standard treatment (Favaretto et al. 2020).”

    From Dental Research in the Digital Age: The Registry-Based Clinical Trial. (2026) · cites this paper as Favaretto et al. 2020

    The Discussion (section 4; page unavailable) addresses consent for dental data and trials using Big Data technologies, but does not discuss whether prior evidence of a new therapy’s superiority makes an older standard treatment ethically unjustifiable. Searches for superior therapies, less effective treatments, and clinical equipoise found no passage addressing that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [40]Da Costa A.L.P. Silva A.A. Pereira C.B. Tele-orthodontics: Tool aid to clinical practice and continuing education Dental Press J. Orthod. Rev. 2012 16 15 21

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Favaretto, M., Shaw, D., De Clercq, E., Joda, T., & Elger, B. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
Corresponding author
Favaretto, Maddalena
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-04-06
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
2495
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014412695
Cited by
94
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
big data, digital dentistry, ethics, privacy, anonymity, data security, informed consent, image tampering, research misconduct, insurance fraud, online professionalism, business interests, internet and communication technology
MeSH terms
Big Data, Dentistry, Humans, Informed Consent, Physician-Patient Relations, Privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review