Cited by 211COVID-19 diagnosis using AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Unveiling COVID-19 from CHEST X-ray with deep learning: A hurdles race with small data

Open access
Tartaglione, Enzo, Barbano, Carlo Alberto, Berzovini, Claudio, Calandri, Marco, Grangetto, Marco·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

The possibility to use widespread and simple chest X-ray (CXR) imaging for early screening of COVID-19 patients is attracting much interest from both the clinical and the AI community. In this study we provide insights and also raise warnings on what is reasonable to expect by applying deep learning to COVID classification of CXR images. We provide a methodological guide and critical reading of an extensive set of statistical results that can be obtained using currently available datasets. In particular, we take the challenge posed by current small size COVID data and show how significant can be the bias introduced by transfer-learning using larger public non-COVID CXR datasets. We also contribute by providing results on a medium size COVID CXR dataset, just collected by one of the major emergency hospitals in Northern Italy during the peak of the COVID pandemic. These novel data allow us to contribute to validate the generalization capacity of preliminary results circulating in the scientific community. Our conclusions shed some light into the possibility to effectively discriminate COVID using CXR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17186933

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shortcut learning can be mitigated using techniques including feature disentanglement and pre-processing techniques like histogram equalization and lung masking.

    “This phenomenon, also called shortcut learning, can be mitigated using various techniques including feature disentanglement (where you reward a model when it learns disease characteristics and penalize the model when it learns features that can discriminate between the original data sets where the images are obtained) 51 ; applying pre-processing techniques like histogram equalization to correct”

    From AI pitfalls and what not to do: mitigating bias in AI (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [31]More A. Survey of resampling techniques for improving classification performance in unbalanced datasets arXiv 2016 1608.06048
  2. [37]Iandola F. Moskewicz M. Karayev S. Girshick R. Darrell T. Keutzer K. Densenet: Implementing efficient convnet descriptor pyramids arXiv 2014 1404.1869

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tartaglione, E., Barbano, C. A., Berzovini, C., Calandri, M., & Grangetto, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT)
  • Ospedale San Luigi Gonzaga (IT)
Corresponding author
Tartaglione, Enzo
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-09-22
Volume
17
Issue
18
Pages
6933
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015984951
Cited by
211
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 24
FWCI
21.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Horizon 2020 (825111)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, chest radiography, COVID-19 classification, transfer learning, limited training data, generalization, early screening, deep learning
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, COVID-19, Humans, Italy, Pneumonia, Viral, Radiography, Thoracic, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review