Cited by 5Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Static Balance Modification during the Workday in Assembly Chain Workers with and without Current Low Back Pain

Open access
Bataller-Cervero, Ana Vanessa, Cimarras-Otal, Cristina, Roche-Seruendo, Luis Enrique, Alcázar-Crevillén, Andrés, Villalba-Ruete, José Antonio, Berzosa, César·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a common recurrent pathology among assembly chain workers. This population tends to spend most of the workday in a static standing posture and handling loads, with balance being essential for correct job performance. LBP is related to poorer postural control, so balance could be affected in this condition. METHODS: The purpose of the present study is to analyze the deterioration of static balance generated by work activity in a prolonged standing position. We assess sway with a pressure platform at three moments of the workday (before, during, and after work), comparing the different balance parameters in 22 manufacturing plant workers with (17) and without (5) LBP. RESULTS: -test showed no significant differences between the pain and non-pain groups' static balance parameters. Between the pre- and mid-workday captures, a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures showed a significant decrease in the medial-lateral center of pressure displacement with open eyes in workers with LBP. CONCLUSIONS: workers with low back pain do not show a greater deterioration in static balance than workers without pain during the workday.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17207385

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MSDs predominantly affect the lumbar zone, shoulders, and arms, but also impact other body areas such as neck, wrists, and lower extremities.

    “Estas lesiones afectan predominantemente la zona lumbar, los hombros y los brazos [8], aunque también impactan otras áreas del cuerpo, como el cuello, las muñecas y las extremidades inferiores [8], [16], [27].”

    From Impact of ergonomics on work performance in the manufacturing industry: A systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Introduction describes low back pain as a common recurrent MSD among workers and notes its high prevalence in metal-working environments. It mentions repetitive upper-limb movements, but does not say MSDs predominantly affect the shoulders or arms, or establish effects on the neck, wrists, or lower extremities. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MSDs are especially frequent in manufacturing industries and extend to various labor groups.

    “Además, no se limitan únicamente a estos sectores corporales, ya que su incidencia se extiende a diversos grupos laborales, siendo especialmente frecuentes en industrias manufactureras [26], [27].”

    From Impact of ergonomics on work performance in the manufacturing industry: A systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Introduction says MSDs affect workers across all types of jobs and sectors, and reports a high prevalence of low back pain in metal-working and other employment sectors. It does not establish that MSDs as a whole are especially frequent in manufacturing compared with other industries. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Forced positions, especially flexion and rotation of the back, increase the risk of lumbar injuries.

    “las posiciones forzadas, especialmente la flexión y la rotación de espalda, incrementan el riesgo de lesiones lumbares [8], [27], [30].”

    From Impact of ergonomics on work performance in the manufacturing industry: A systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Introduction (page not provided) says that awkward postures at work could cause or exacerbate low back pain. It does not identify back flexion or rotation as particular risks, or establish an increased risk of lumbar injuries rather than pain. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. [1]Wynne-Jones G. Cowen J. Jordan J.L. Uthman O.A. Main C.J. Glozier N. Van Der Windt D. Absence from work and return to work in people with back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis Occup. Environ. Med. 2013 71 448 456 10.1136/oemed-2013-101571 24186944 PMC4033140 · DOI
  2. [2]Bataller-Cervero A.V. Cimarras-Otal C. Sanz-López F. Lacárcel-Tejero B. Alcázar-Crevillén A. Ruete J.A.V. Musculoskeletal disorders assessment using sick-leaves registers in a manufacturing plant in Spain Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2016 56 124 129 10.1016/j.ergon.2016.10.002 · DOI
  3. [3]Driscoll T. Jacklyn G. Orchard J. Passmore E. Vos T. Freedman G. Lim S. Punnett L. The global burden of occupationally related low back pain: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014 73 975 981 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204631 24665117 · DOI
  4. [4]Sterud T. Tynes T. Work-related psychosocial and mechanical risk factors for low back pain: A 3-year follow-up study of the general working population in Norway Occup. Environ. Med. 2013 70 296 302 10.1136/oemed-2012-101116 23322920 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Locks F. Gupta N. Hallman D. Jørgensen M.B. Oliveira A.B. Holtermann A. Association between objectively measured static standing and low back pain—A cross-sectional study among blue-collar workers Ergonomics 2018 61 1196 1207 10.1080/00140139.2018.1455900 29560812 · DOI
  6. [6]Gregory D.E. Callaghan J.P. Prolonged standing as a precursor for the development of low back discomfort: An investigation of possible mechanisms Gait Posture 2008 28 86 92 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.10.005 18053722 · DOI
  7. [7]Ghasemkhani M. Mahmudi E. Jabbari H. Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Workers Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2008 14 455 462 10.1080/10803548.2008.11076784 19080050 · DOI
  8. [8]Menegon F.A. Fischer F.M. Musculoskeletal reported symptoms among aircraft assembly workers: A multifactorial approach Work 2012 41 Suppl. 1 3738 3745 10.3233/WOR-2012-0088-3738 22317290 · DOI
  9. [9]Tousignant M. Rossignol M. Goulet L. Dassa C. Occupational disability related to back pain: Application of a theoretical model of work disability using prospective cohorts of manual workers Am. J. Ind. Med. 2000 37 410 422 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(200004)37:4<410::AID-AJIM11>3.0.CO;2-8 10706753 · DOI
  10. [10]Alexopoulos E.C. Stathi I.-C. Charizani F. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in dentists BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2004 5 16 10.1186/1471-2474-5-16 15189564 PMC441388 · DOI
  11. [11]Josephson M. Lagerström M. Hagberg M. Hjelm E.W. Musculoskeletal symptoms and job strain among nursing personnel: A study over a three year period Occup. Environ. Med. 1997 54 681 685 10.1136/oem.54.9.681 9423583 PMC1128844 · DOI
  12. [12]Sadeghian F. Kasaeian A. Noroozi P. Vatani J. Taiebi S.H. Psychosocial and Individual Characteristics and Musculoskeletal Complaints among Clinical Laboratory Workers Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2014 20 355 361 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077049 24934430 · DOI
  13. [13]Nagasu M. Sakai K. Ito A. Tomita S. Temmyo Y. Ueno M. Miyagi S. Prevalence and risk factors for low back pain among professional cooks working in school lunch services BMC Public Health 2007 7 171 10.1186/1471-2458-7-171 17650300 PMC1971070 · DOI
  14. [14]Della Volpe R. Popa T. Ginanneschi F. Spidalieri R. Mazzocchio R. Rossi A. Changes in coordination of postural control during dynamic stance in chronic low back pain patients Gait Posture 2006 24 349 355 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.10.009 16311036 · DOI
  15. [15]Mientjes M. Frank J.S. Balance in chronic low back pain patients compared to healthy people under various conditions in upright standing Clin. Biomech. 1999 14 710 716 10.1016/S0268-0033(99)00025-X 10545625 · DOI
  16. [16]Ruhe A. Fejer R. Walker B.F. Is there a relationship between pain intensity and postural sway in patients with non-specific low back pain? BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2011 12 162 10.1186/1471-2474-12-162 21762484 PMC3146912 · DOI
  17. [17]Da Silva R.A. Vieira E.R. Fernandes K.B.P. Andraus R.A. Oliveira M.R. Sturion L.A. Calderon M.G. People with chronic low back pain have poorer balance than controls in challenging tasks Disabil. Rehabil. 2017 40 1294 1300 10.1080/09638288.2017.1294627 28282992 · DOI
  18. [19]Brumagne S. Cordo P. Lysens R. Verschueren S. Swinnen S. The Role of Paraspinal Muscle Spindles in Lumbosacral Position Sense in Individuals with and Without Low Back Pain Spine 2000 25 989 994 10.1097/00007632-200004150-00015 10767813 · DOI
  19. [20]Rossi A. Decchi B. Ginanneschi F. Presynaptic excitability changes of group Ia fibres to muscle nociceptive stimulation in humans Brain Res. 1999 818 12 22 10.1016/S0006-8993(98)01253-0 9914433 · DOI
  20. [21]Baratto L. Morasso P.G. Re C. Spada G. A new look at posturographic analysis in the clinical context: Sway-density versus other parameterization techniques Mot. Control 2002 6 246 270 10.1123/mcj.6.3.246 12122219 · DOI
  21. [22]Hodges P.W. Changes in motor planning of feedforward postural responses of the trunk muscles in low back pain Exp. Brain Res. 2001 141 261 266 10.1007/s002210100873 11713638 · DOI
  22. [23]Alexander K.M. LaPier T.L.K. Differences in Static Balance and Weight Distribution between Normal Subjects and Subjects with Chronic Unilateral Low Back Pain J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1998 28 378 383 10.2519/jospt.1998.28.6.378 9836168 · DOI
  23. [24]Tjernström F. Björklund M. Malmström E.-M. Romberg ratio in quiet stance posturography—Test to retest reliability Gait Posture 2015 42 27 31 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.12.007 25891528 · DOI
  24. [25]Choy N.L. Brauer S.G. Nitz J. Changes in postural stability in women aged 20 to 80 years J. Gerontol. Ser. A Boil. Sci. Med. Sci. 2003 58 M525 M530 10.1093/gerona/58.6.M525 12807923 · DOI
  25. [26]Vereeck L. Wuyts F. Truijen S. Van De Heyning P. Clinical assessment of balance: Normative data, and gender and age effects Int. J. Audiol. 2008 47 67 75 10.1080/14992020701689688 18236239 · DOI
  26. [27]World Medical Association General Assembly World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Revised October 7, 2000 HIV Clin. Trials 2001 2 92 95 10.1310/GTFR-2DRX-M6YE-ELXR 11590516 · DOI
  27. [28]Hjermstad M.J. Fayers P.M. Haugen D.F. Caraceni A. Hanks G.W. Loge J.H. Fainsinger R. Aass N. Kaasa S. Studies Comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for Assessment of Pain Intensity in Adults: A Systematic Literature Review J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2011 41 1073 1093 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016 21621130 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [29]Romero-Franco N. Martínez-Amat A. Hita-Contreras F. Martínez-López E.J. Short-term Effects of a Proprioceptive Training Session with Unstable Platforms on the Monopodal Stabilometry of Athletes J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2014 26 45 51 10.1589/jpts.26.45 24567674 PMC3927040 · DOI
  29. [30]Krewer C. Bergmann J. Gräfrath P.C. Jahn K. Influence of foot position on static and dynamic standing balance in healthy young adults Hear. Balance Commun. 2018 16 208 214 10.1080/21695717.2018.1507576 · DOI
  30. [31]Paillard T. Noe F. Techniques and Methods for Testing the Postural Function in Healthy and Pathological Subjects BioMed Res. Int. 2015 2015 891390 10.1155/2015/891390 26640800 PMC4659957 · DOI
  31. [32]Ruhe A. Fejer R. Walker B.F. The test–retest reliability of centre of pressure measures in bipedal static task conditions—A systematic review of the literature Gait Posture 2010 32 436 445 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.09.012 20947353 · DOI
  32. [33]Hopkins W.G. Marshall S.W. Batterham A.M. Hanin J. Progressive Statistics for Studies in Sports Medicine and Exercise Science Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2009 41 3 13 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278 19092709 · DOI · Paper page
  33. [34]Mann L. Kleinpaul J.F. Moro A.R.P. Mota C.B. Carpes F.P. Effect of low back pain on postural stability in younger women: Influence of visual deprivation J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2010 14 361 366 10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.06.007 20850043 · DOI
  34. [35]Nies N. Sinnott P.L. Variations in balance and body sway in middle-aged adults. Subjects with healthy backs compared with subjects with low-back dysfunction Spine 1991 16 325 330 1827539
  35. [36]Harringe M. Halvorsen K. Renström P. Werner S. Postural control measured as the center of pressure excursion in young female gymnasts with low back pain or lower extremity injury Gait Posture 2008 28 38 45 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.09.011 18023584 · DOI
  36. [37]Luoto S. Taimela S. Hurri H. Aalto H. Pyykko I. Alaranta H. Psychomotor speed and postural control in chronic low back pain patients: A controlled follow-up study Spine 1996 21 2621 2627 10.1097/00007632-199611150-00012 8961450 · DOI
  37. [38]Mok N.W. Brauer S.G. Hodges P.W. Hip Strategy for Balance Control in Quiet Standing Is Reduced in People with Low Back Pain Spine 2004 29 E107 E112 10.1097/01.BRS.0000115134.97854.C9 15014284 · DOI
  38. [39]Salavati M. Mazaheri M. Negahban H. Ebrahimi I. Jafari A.H. Kazemnejad A. Parnianpour M. Effect of Dual-Tasking on Postural Control in Subjects With Nonspecific Low Back Pain Spine 2009 34 1415 1421 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a3a917 19478663 · DOI
  39. [40]Van Emmerik R. Van Wegen E.E. On the Functional Aspects of Variability in Postural Control Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2002 30 177 183 10.1097/00003677-200210000-00007 12398115 · DOI
  40. [41]Lafond D. Champagne A. Descarreaux M. Dubois J.-D. Prado J.M. Duarte M. Postural control during prolonged standing in persons with chronic low back pain Gait Posture 2009 29 421 427 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.10.064 19084411 · DOI
  41. [42]Gallagher K.M. Nelson-Wong E. Callaghan J.P. Do individuals who develop transient low back pain exhibit different postural changes than non-pain developers during prolonged standing? Gait Posture 2011 34 490 495 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.06.025 21802955 · DOI
  42. [43]Pau M. Kim S. Nussbaum M.A. Fatigue-induced balance alterations in a group of Italian career and retained firefighters Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2014 44 615 620 10.1016/j.ergon.2014.06.010 · DOI
  43. [44]Derave W. Tombeux N. Cottyn J. Pannier J.L. De Clercq D. Treadmill Exercise Negatively Affects Visual Contribution to Static Postural Stability Int. J. Sports Med. 2002 23 44 49 10.1055/s-2002-19374 11774066 · DOI
  44. [45]Corbeil P. Blouin J.-S. Bégin F. Nougier V. Teasdale N. Perturbation of the postural control system induced by muscular fatigue Gait Posture 2003 18 92 100 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00198-4 14654212 · DOI
  45. [46]Brumagne S. Janssens L. Janssens E. Goddyn L. Altered postural control in anticipation of postural instability in persons with recurrent low back pain Gait Posture 2008 28 657 662 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.04.015 18541428 · DOI
  46. [47]Yahia A. Jribi S. Ghroubi S. Baklouti S. Elleuch M.H. Evaluation of the posture and muscular strength of the trunk and inferior members of patients with chronic lumbar pain Jt. Bone Spine 2011 78 291 297 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.09.008 20971670 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bataller-Cervero, A. V., Cimarras-Otal, C., Roche-Seruendo, L. E., Alcázar-Crevillén, A., Villalba-Ruete, J. A., & Berzosa, C.
Affiliations
  • Universidad San Jorge (ES)
  • Laboratorio de Biomecánica, Hospital MAZ, 50015 Zaragoza, Spain
  • Servicio Médico, BSH/EE, 50016 Zaragoza, Spain
Corresponding author
Cimarras-Otal, Cristina
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-10-10
Volume
17
Issue
20
Pages
7385
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3091918689
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universidad San Jorge (S08_20R)
  • Gobierno de Aragón (S08_20R)
  • European Social Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
low back pain, static balance, postural control, prolonged standing, center of pressure displacement, sway, industrial workers, occupational health
MeSH terms
Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities, Standing Position, Adult, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Posture, Spain, Low Back Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review