Cited by 79Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsArt Therapy and Mental Health

Promoting Reminiscences with Virtual Reality Headsets: A Pilot Study with People with Dementia

Open access
Coelho, Tiago, Marques, Cátia, Moreira, Daniela, Soares, Maria, Portugal, Paula, Marques, António, Ferreira, Ana Rita, Martins, Sónia +1 more·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the feasibility and effects of promoting reminiscences, using virtual reality (VR) headsets for viewing 360° videos with personal relevance, with people with dementia. A study with a mixed methods design was conducted with nine older adults diagnosed with dementia. Interventions consisted of four sessions, in which the participants' engagement, psychological and behavioral symptoms, and simulation sickness symptoms were evaluated. Neuropsychiatric symptomatology and quality of life were measured pre- and post-intervention. Caregivers were interviewed regarding the effect of the approach. In most cases, participants appeared to enjoy the sessions, actively explored the 360° environment, and shared memories associated with the depicted locations, often spontaneously. There were no cases of significant increases in simulator sickness and psychological and behavioral symptoms during sessions, with only some instances of minor eyestrain, fullness of head, anxiety, irritability, and agitation being detected. Although there were no significant changes in the measured outcomes after intervention, the caregivers assessed the experience as potentially beneficial for most participants. In this study, promoting reminiscences with VR headsets was found to be a safe and engaging experience for people with dementia. However, future studies are required to better understand the added value of immersion, using VR, in reminiscence therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17249301

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants were seen responding both verbally and non-verbally to narration, staff questions, and the experiences themselves.

    “Participants were seen responding both verbally and non-verbally to narration, staff questions, and the experiences themselves (Coelho et al., 2020).”

    From Facilitators and Barriers to Using Virtual Reality and its Impact on Social Engagement in Aged Care Settings: A Scoping Review (2023) · cites this paper as Coelho et al., 2020

    The Results (page not provided) describe participants talking about what they saw, pointing at parts of the VR environment, and communicating either spontaneously or after questions or prompts. The Data Collection section also says researchers assessed verbal and non-verbal reactions. These passages support responses to staff questions and the experiences themselves, but our copy does not establish that participants responded to narration. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Dementia: Assessment, Management and Support for People Living with Dementia and Their Carers (NG97) Available online: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng97 (accessed on 15 September 2020) 30011160

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coelho, T., Marques, C., Moreira, D., Soares, M., Portugal, P., Marques, A., Ferreira, A. R., Martins, S., & Fernandes, L.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Universidade Técnica do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Coelho, Tiago
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-12-12
Volume
17
Issue
24
Pages
9301
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111901502
Cited by
79
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UIDB/05210/2020, UIDB/4255/2020)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
dementia, reminiscence therapy, virtual reality, 360-degree video, immersive media, simulator sickness, quality of life, caregivers, older adults
MeSH terms
Virtual Reality, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review