Cited by 22Child Abuse and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Welfare and Adoption

Validation and Adaptation of the Slovak Version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ)

Open access
Petrikova, Martina, Kascakova, Natalia, Furstova, Jana, Hasto, Jozef, Tavel, Peter·2021·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Background: Previous research has shown a strong relationship between childhood trauma and worsened physical and mental health. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) is a commonly used tool assessing early traumatic experiences. The aim of this study was to verify the psychometric properties of the Slovak version of the CTQ. Methods: Data were collected on a representative Slovak sample (N = 1018, mean age 46.24 years, 48.7% of men). The dimensional structure of the CTQ was tested by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA); convergent validity was assessed using the Adverse Childhood Questionnaire (ACE-IQ). Results: CFA confirmed the standard 5-factor CTQ model. The subscales of the CTQ and the ACE-IQ questionnaires showed moderate to high correlations. The internal consistency of the scale was found to be acceptable. Emotional neglect (EN) was reported in 48.1%, physical neglect (PN) in 35.8%, emotional abuse in 15.8%, physical abuse (PA) in 11.0%, and sexual abuse (SA) in 9.1% of the Slovak population, according to the scoring, when even low abuse or neglect is assessed as trauma. Conclusion: The CTQ questionnaire fulfilled the validation criteria and appeared to be a suitable method for assessing retrospectively reported childhood trauma experiences in the Slovak population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph18052440

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [33]Central Office of Labour, Social Affairs and Family of the Slovak Republic Ročné výkazy V12 MPSVR SR o Vykonávaní Opatrení Sociálnoprávnej Ochrany Detí a Sociálnej Kurately 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2017 Available online: https://www.upsvr.gov.sk/statistiky/rocne-vykazy-mpsvr-sr/rocne-vykazy-v12-mpsvr-sr-o-vykonavani-opatreni-socialnopravnej-ochrany-deti-a-socialnej-kurately-2008-2009-2010-2011.html?page_id=77297 (accessed on 1 September 2020)
  2. [37]Bernstein D.P. Fink L. Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, A Retrospective Self-report: Manual NCS Pearson San Antonio, TX, USA 1998

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petrikova, M., Kascakova, N., Furstova, J., Hasto, J., & Tavel, P.
Affiliations
  • Palacký University Olomouc (CZ)
  • Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University Olomouc, Univerzitní 22, 77111 Olomouc, Czech Republic
Corresponding author
Petrikova, Martina
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-03-02
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
2440
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134697231
Cited by
22
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Grantová Agentura České Republiky (19-18964S)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, childhood trauma, Slovak translation, psychometric validation, emotional neglect, physical neglect, emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, internal consistency, Slovak population
MeSH terms
Child, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Slovakia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review