Cited by 16Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Sensory processing, perceived stress and burnout symptoms in a working population during the COVID-19 crisis

Open access
van den Boogert, Frank, Spaan, Pascalle, Sizoo, Bram, Bouman, Yvonne H. A., Hoogendijk, Witte J. G., Roza, Sabine J.·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Although previous research suggests an association between sensory processing and perceived stress in a broad spectrum of mental health conditions, it remains unclear whether this phenomenon occurs independently from psychopathology. The present study investigated the association between sensory processing patterns, perceived stress and occupational burnout as a stress-related condition in a working population. We focused on different aspects of sensory processing and used the momentum of a particularly stressful period: during the first months of the global COVID-19 crisis. A total of 116 workers at a mental healthcare institution in The Netherlands completed the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (AASP), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). Our results demonstrated that higher scores on sensory sensitivity and low registration were associated with higher scores on perceived stress and core burnout symptoms. Sensory hypersensitivity was also associated with more secondary burnout symptoms. Associations were not driven by underlying sensory-related disorders (e.g., ASD or ADHD). In conclusion, sensory processing difficulties are relevant predictors of stress and occupational burnout, also in healthy employees. This phenomenon warrants further attention, as relatively simple adjustments in working environment may possess important preventive effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph19042043

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over time, repeated adaptation to changing sensory and organisational conditions may contribute to fatigue, overwhelm, and difficulties sustaining engagement in work, with negative repercussions for well-being.

    “Over time, repeated adaptation to changing sensory and organisational conditions may contribute to fatigue, overwhelm, and difficulties sustaining engagement in work, with negative repercussions for well-being (van den Boogert et al., 2022; Morris et al., 2025)”

    From The system-level organisational design framework: a neuro-cognitive trait interaction approach to workplace inclusion for autistic people (2026) · cites this paper as van den Boogert et al., 2022

    The Discussion links heightened sensory sensitivity under chronic stress to exhaustion, while the Introduction describes burnout as involving extreme tiredness and mental distancing. The Results also report increased workload, decreased effectiveness and less pleasure in work during pandemic-related changes. The paper does not establish repeated adaptation to changing sensory and organisational conditions as the mechanism connecting those changes to the reported difficulties. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Cohen S. Kamarck T. Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress J. Health Soc. Behav. 1983 24 385 396 10.2307/2136404 6668417 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
van den Boogert, F., Spaan, P., Sizoo, B., Bouman, Y. H. A., Hoogendijk, W. J. G., & Roza, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Dimence (NL)
  • Department of Research, Transfore, 7416 SB Deventer, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Roza, Sabine J.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-02-11
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
2043
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4212857431
Cited by
16
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Stichting Vrienden van Oldenkotte (FORETECH)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
sensory processing, sensory hypersensitivity, sensory sensitivity, sensory registration, perceived stress, occupational burnout, COVID-19 pandemic, working population, burnout prevention
MeSH terms
Burnout, Psychological, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Adult, Burnout, Professional, Humans, Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review