Cited by 79Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

The impact of “home office” work on physical activity and sedentary behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review

Open access
Wilms, Patrick, Schröder, Jan, Reer, Rüdiger, Scheit, Lorenz·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

In 2020, as part of the COVID-19 pandemic, governments around the world enacted a wide variety of regulations and laws to contain the incidence of infection. One of these measures was the relocation of work to the home office. The objective of this review was to analyze the influence of the home office in correlation with regulations on sedentary and activity behavior. A search was conducted on various electronic databases from November 2019 to January 2022, using the search terms physical activity (PA), COVID-19, and working from home. The primary outcomes were changes in PA and sedentary behavior (SB). Secondary outcomes included pain, mood, and parenting stress. The risk of bias was assessed using the (NHLBI) Quality Assessment Tool. For the review, 21 articles met the inclusion criteria (total n = 1268). There was a significant increase in SB (+16%) and a decrease in PA (-17%), Light PA (-26%), and moderate to vigorous PA (-20%). There was also an increase in pain and parenting stress and a decrease in well-being. Due to our significant results, programs that promote movement should be created. Future studies should explore how an increase of PA and a reduction of SB in the home office could be achieved.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph191912344

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilms, P., Schröder, J., Reer, R., & Scheit, L.
Affiliations
  • Bundeswehrkrankenhaus (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Scheit, Lorenz
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-09-28
Volume
19
Issue
19
Pages
12344
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297522402
Cited by
79
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Hamburg
  • Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Hamburg
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
working from home, physical activity, sedentary behavior, COVID-19 pandemic, light physical activity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, pain, parental stress, well-being
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Humans, Pain, Exercise, Sedentary Behavior, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review