The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teaching, Learning and Assessing Anatomy with Artificial Intelligence: The Road to a Better Future
Open accessAbstract
Anatomy is taught in the early years of an undergraduate medical curriculum. The subject is volatile and of voluminous content, given the complex nature of the human body. Students frequently face learning constraints in these fledgling years of medical education, often resulting in a spiraling dwindling academic performance. Hence, there have been continued efforts directed at developing new curricula and incorporating new methods of teaching, learning and assessment that are aimed at logical learning and long-term retention of anatomical knowledge, which is a mainstay of all medical practice. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has gained in popularity. AI uses machine learning models to store, compute, analyze and even augment huge amounts of data to be retrieved when needed, while simultaneously the machine itself can be programmed for deep learning, improving its own efficiency through complex neural networks. There are numerous specific benefits to incorporating AI in education, which include in-depth learning, storage of large electronic data, teaching from remote locations, engagement of fewer personnel in teaching, quick feedback from responders, innovative assessment methods and user-friendly alternatives. AI has long been a part of medical diagnostics and treatment planning. Extensive literature is available on uses of AI in clinical settings, e.g., in Radiology, but to the best of our knowledge there is a paucity of published data on AI used for teaching, learning and assessment in anatomy. In the present review, we highlight recent novel and advanced AI techniques such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), or more complex Convoluted Neural Networks (CNN) and Bayesian U-Net, which are used for teaching anatomy. We also address the main advantages and limitations of the use of AI in medical education and lessons learnt from AI application during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the future, studies with AI in anatomy education could be advantageous for both students to develop professional expertise and for instructors to develop improved teaching methods for this vast and complex subject, especially with the increasing paucity of cadavers in many medical schools. We also suggest some novel examples of how AI could be incorporated to deliver augmented reality experiences, especially with reference to complex regions in the human body, such as neural pathways in the brain, complex developmental processes in the embryo or in complicated miniature regions such as the middle and inner ear. AI can change the face of assessment techniques and broaden their dimensions to suit individual learners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The higher retention rate observed in the AI-Enhanced Group suggests that AI-supported learning environments may facilitate deeper cognitive processing and more durable memory formation [27].”
From Effectiveness of a generative AI-powered digital tutor integrated with a knowledge graph in anatomy education for nursing students: a randomized controlled trial (2026) · cites this paper as [27]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Finally, several studies pointed to the infrastructure, financial resources, and investments necessary to implement AI-driven education methods [9, 50, 181], as the costs of servers, faculty training, tool development, and technical personnel could be substantial [182–184].”
From Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [182]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Artificial intelligence in healthcare
Yu, K.-H., Beam, A. L., & Kohane, I. S. (2018) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z · Cited by 2,817
Artificial intelligence in medicine
Ramesh, A., Kambhampati, C., Monson, J. Q., & Drew, P. J. (2004) · Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England · doi:10.1308/147870804290 · Cited by 1,095
(2019) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · Cited by 1,004
Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review
Estai, M., & Bunt, S. M. (2016) · Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger · doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.010 · Cited by 1,001
The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization
Sugand, K., Abrahams, P., & Khurana, A. (2010) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.139 · Cited by 999
Irby, D. M., Cooke, M., & OʼBrien, B. C. (2010) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181c88449 · Cited by 924
Chan, K. S., & Zary, N. (2019) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/13930 · Cited by 877 · cited 2×
“The term itself (AI) has been well described by a few authors [31,32] and defined as a machine with intelligent behaviour and the ability to perform tasks usually performed by humans [32,33].”
BackgroundMedical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow
Drake, R. L., McBride, J. M., Lachman, N., & Pawlina, W. (2009) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.117 · Cited by 818
Anatomy in a Modern Medical Curriculum
Turney, B. (2007) · Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England · doi:10.1308/003588407x168244 · Cited by 792
The production of anatomical teaching resources using three‐dimensional (3D) printing technology
McMenamin, P. G., Quayle, M. R., McHenry, C. R., & Adams, J. W. (2014) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.1475 · Cited by 700
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- McCarthy, J., Minsky, M.L., Rochester, N., and Shannon, C.E. (2022, August 25). A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Magazine, Available online: https://ojs.aaai.org//index.php/aimagazine/article/view/1904.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–119 of 119
项响琴, Ning, J., Wang, X., Shu, J., Wu, Z., Wu, X., 唐新庆, & Zou, L. (2026) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2026.132528
Wang, Y., Li, S. U. I., Yusi, C. A. I., & Changle, C. H. E. N. (2026) · US-China Education Review A · doi:10.17265/2161-623x/2026.04.002
Devi, G. D., Devaki, P. R., Koshy, J. M., Rahe, R., & Archana, R. (2026) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.70129
A Multi-Chatbot Analysis: Strengths and Weaknesses in Neuroanatomy Learning
Naim, A., Naim, S., & Saverino, D. (2026) · Information · doi:10.3390/info17050475
Fan, Y., Zheng, X., Yang, G., Li, P., Ran, Y., Xu, T., & Wei, T. (2026) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000049128
Wang, J., & Li, Y. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2691562 · Cited by 1
Ramdass, C., Moodley, J., Ngene, N. C., & Govender, N. (2026) · International Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1155/ijhy/9198942
Dissecting interprofessional anatomy education: insights from AI-driven assessment
Quach, S., Michalenko, E., Stodola, T., Mitchell, J. P., Wainman, B. C., Wojkowski, S., & Mezil, Y. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-026-09700-y
Mohamad, M., Alzoubi, A., & Chafic, O. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31418-5_20
What Counts as Educational Innovation in Clinical Anatomy?
Sanchis‐Gimeno, J. A., Orellana‐Donoso, M., & Valenzuela‐Fuenzalida, J. J. (2026) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.70190
Ahmad, A., O’Malley, A., & Gardner, A. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.107119
Jayasekhar, R., & Kandasamy, G. (2026) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.70317
Artificial intelligence in medical education: a narrative review across four functional domains
Zarei, M., Mozaffari, M., & Hajiani, Y. (2026) · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2026.102752
Development of AI competencies within the medical curriculum
Cevallos, M. B. M., López, D. F. V., Avalos, C. H. M., Morocho, B. C. H., Ameza, J. D. S., & León, M. L. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1899639
Changing Studying Trends of New Age Medicos: A Student Perspective
Shangloo, P., Raina, H., & Gupta, S. (2026) · National Journal of Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.4103/njca.njca_15_26
O USO DA INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL GENERATIVA - CHATGPT - NA FORMAÇÃO MÉDICA: UMA REVISÃO NARRATIVA
Mota, V. E. R., Costa, A. C. D., Tiago, A. J. S., Morais, B. B., Costa, M. F. O., & Lemos, V. S. (2026) · Revista Master Ensino Pesquisa e Extensão · doi:10.47224/revistamaster.v10i20.774
Mi, Y., Zhou, L., & Peng, Y. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.112609
Aldalou, M., Brooks, W. S., & Wilson, A. B. (2026) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.70372
Kastamoni, M., Çeçen, S., & Kastamonı, Y. (2026) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.70243
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdellatif, H., Al Mushaiqri, M., Albalushi, H., Al-Zaabi, A. A., Roychoudhury, S., & Das, S.
- Affiliations
- Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
- Department of Human & Clinical Anatomy, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al Khoud, Muscat 123, Oman
- Corresponding author
- Das, Srijit
- Venue
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-10-31
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 14209
- ISSN
- 1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9656803
- OpenAlex
- W4308118441
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in medical education, anatomy education, artificial neural networks, convolutional neural networks, anatomy assessment, augmented reality, COVID-19 pandemic, cadaver shortage, neural pathways, embryonic development, inner ear, deep learning
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, Artificial Intelligence, Bayes Theorem, Curriculum, Humans, Teaching, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review