Cited by 924Innovations in Medical EducationHealth and Medical EducationDiversity and Career in Medicine

Calls for Reform of Medical Education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010

Irby, David M., Cooke, Molly, OʼBrien, Bridget C.·2010·Academic Medicine

Abstract

The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, which in 1910 helped stimulate the transformation of North American medical education with the publication of the Flexner Report, has a venerated place in the history of American medical education. Within a decade following Flexner's report, a strong scientifically oriented and rigorous form of medical education became well established; its structures and processes have changed relatively little since. However, the forces of change are again challenging medical education, and new calls for reform are emerging. In 2010, the Carnegie Foundation will issue another report, Educating Physicians: A Call for Reform of Medical School and Residency, that calls for (1) standardizing learning outcomes and individualizing the learning process, (2) promoting multiple forms of integration, (3) incorporating habits of inquiry and improvement, and (4) focusing on the progressive formation of the physician's professional identity. The authors, who wrote the 2010 Carnegie report, trace the seeds of these themes in Flexner's work and describe their own conceptions of them, addressing the prior and current challenges to medical education as well as recommendations for achieving excellence. The authors hope that the new report will generate the same excitement about educational innovation and reform of undergraduate and graduate medical education as the Flexner Report did a century ago.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0b013e3181c88449

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to a scarcity of clinical mentors and limited opportunities for hands-on practice, students frequently miss out on critical interactions with actual patients.

    “Furthermore, due to a scarcity of clinical mentors and limited opportunities for hands-on practice, students frequently miss out on critical interactions with actual patients7,8.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irby, D. M., Cooke, M., & OʼBrien, B. C.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Irby, David M.
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2010-02
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
220-227
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102059763
Cited by
924
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 47
FWCI
39.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
medical education reform, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Flexner Report, personalized learning, inquiry-based learning, professional identity formation, medical school reform, resident education, history of medical education
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Education, Medical, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Organizational Innovation, Professional Competence, Schools, Medical, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review