Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 83Maternal and Neonatal HealthcarePublic Health and Social InequalitiesHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 269 of the 272 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet; none of the 340 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

A Comprehensive Review on Social Inequalities and Pregnancy Outcome—Identification of Relevant Pathways and Mechanisms

Open access
Simoncic, Valentin, Deguen, Séverine, Enaux, Christophe, Vandentorren, Stéphanie, Kihal-Talantikite, Wahida·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Scientific literature tends to support the idea that the pregnancy and health status of fetuses and newborns can be affected by maternal, parental, and contextual characteristics. In addition, a growing body of evidence reports that social determinants, measured at individual and/or aggregated level(s), play a crucial role in fetal and newborn health. Numerous studies have found social factors (including maternal age and education, marital status, pregnancy intention, and socioeconomic status) to be linked to poor birth outcomes. Several have also suggested that beyond individual and contextual social characteristics, living environment and conditions (or “neighborhood”) emerge as important determinants in health inequalities, particularly for pregnant women. Using a comprehensive review, we present a conceptual framework based on the work of both the Commission on Social Determinants of Health and the World Health Organization (WHO), aimed at describing the various pathways through which social characteristics can affect both pregnancy and fetal health, with a focus on the structural social determinants (such as socioeconomic and political context) that influence social position, as well as on intermediary determinants. We also suggest that social position may influence more specific intermediary health determinants; individuals may, on the basis of their social position, experience differences in environmental exposure and vulnerability to health-compromising living conditions. Our model highlights the fact that adverse birth outcomes, which inevitably lead to health inequity, may, in turn, affect the individual social position. In order to address both the inequalities that begin in utero and the disparities observed at birth, it is important for interventions to target various unhealthy behaviors and psychosocial conditions in early pregnancy. Health policy must, then, support: (i) midwifery availability and accessibility and (ii) enhanced multidisciplinary support for deprived pregnant women.

Checked 2026-11-13 · 2 references not checked yet

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This comprehensive review of 35 studies finds excess risk of low birthweight (LBW) and preterm birth (PTB) among deprived pregnant women and those living in deprived neighborhoods. It proposes a WHO/CSDH-based conceptual framework linking structural social determinants through material circumstances, behaviors/lifestyle, psychosocial environment, and healthcare access to adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Key findings

  • From 359 screened studies, 35 met inclusion criteria and most showed increased LBW or decreased birthweight with adverse socioeconomic conditions: maternal education LBW risk ranged from OR = 2.0 [1.49–2.71] to RR = 3.77 [2.26–6.30]; unemployment during pregnancy OR = 1.7 [1.37–2.10]; maternal income OR = 1.7 [1.58–2.84]; employment precarity RR = 1.48 [1.11–1.98].
  • Birthweight decreased by beta = −103 g [−108; −97] for lower vs. higher maternal education and beta = −56 g [−61; −50] for paternal education; living in the most deprived areas was associated with beta = −113.4 g [−133.0; −93.8].
  • PTB risk was higher in the highest county poverty quartile (OR = 1.18; 95% CI [1.03, 1.35]), in deprived vs. privileged neighborhoods (OR = 1.16; 95% CI [1.06–1.27]), and in most deprived vs. most privileged groups (OR = 1.5; 95% CI [1.3; 1.7]).
  • SGA was associated with social characteristics in all but two studies: unemployment OR ≈ 1.3, low parental education up to 2.8, lowest income decile OR = 2.0 [1.78; 2.26], less skilled family head occupation RR = 1.79 [1.29; 2.47], and most deprived neighborhoods OR = 1.18 [1.07; 1.30].

Methods

  • Comprehensive review following PRISMA: PubMed search for English-language articles published January 2000–April 2022, plus reference-list and citation screening, using keywords for deprivation, socioeconomic inequality, neighborhood, lifestyle, and outcomes including LBW, birthweight, PTB, gestational age, and SGA.
  • Inclusion criteria were human studies, peer-reviewed English papers after 2000, restricted to pregnant women and pregnancy outcomes; non-original studies were excluded. Two authors independently screened and extracted data; 359 studies were screened and 35 met criteria.
  • Extracted measures included ORs, HRs, RRs, and other association metrics, preferentially from fully adjusted models; the paper then adapted the CSDH/WHO conceptual framework to propose pathways and mechanisms.

Limitations

  • The paper states that heterogeneous statistical methods and confounding factors make comparison across studies difficult; most studies used classical multivariate regression, only five performed multilevel analysis, and two tested mediation via structural equation models.
  • The paper states that none of the reviewed studies adjusted on household characteristics such as family income, parental life course factors, and family smoking status, and none explored paternal characteristics except one study.
  • Evident from the text: the search was limited to PubMed and English-language articles, and the included studies were heavily concentrated in the United States, with only six from Europe/UK, one from Asia, and one covering four countries; no formal quality appraisal or meta-analytic pooling is reported.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph192416592

Cites

269 of 271 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 A conceptual framework adapted and modified from the WHO’s Commission of Social Determinants of Health and from the analysis of the studies reviewed. Amenity is a useful or enjoyable feature. An environmental amenity is referred to any benefits that increase the attractiveness of a place or neighborhood by increasing its comfort or convenience. Examples of amenities are pleasant views, good schools or good green space.
Figure 1 A conceptual framework adapted and modified from the WHO’s Commission of Social Determinants of Health and from the analysis of the studies reviewed. Amenity is a useful or enjoyable feature. An environmental amenity is referred to any benefits that increase the attractiveness of a place or neighborhood by increasing its comfort or convenience. Examples of amenities are pleasant views, good schools or good green space.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 A conceptual model to explain the overlapping relationship between social deprivation (including individual and neighborhood level) and adverse birth outcomes.
Figure 2 A conceptual model to explain the overlapping relationship between social deprivation (including individual and neighborhood level) and adverse birth outcomes.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 5 Not valid · 148 Not checked · 56 Own results and interpretations

107 more claims

Create a free account to see all 209 claims and to verify the 334 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 73
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 41

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Show all 272 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Deguen, 2020, Environmental Amenities and the Fetal and Infant Health during the FIrst 1000 Days of Life: A Literature Review and Theoretical Contribution, Méd. Reprod., 22, 16
  2. Kaplan, R., and Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective, Cambridge University Press. pp. xii, 340.
  3. Gray, R., Headley, J., Oakley, L., Kurinczuk, J.J., Brocklehurst, P., and Hollowell, J. (2022, August 20). Towards an Understanding of Variations in Infant Mortality Rates between Different Ethnic Groups in England and Wales. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Towards-an-understanding-of-variations-in-infant-in-Graya-Headleyb/d7a8fb6fb35f6b7516e7d6cfdbceb24f70cd080b.

Cited by

See all 83

Metadata

Authors
Simoncic, V., Deguen, S., Enaux, C., Vandentorren, S., & Kihal-Talantikite, W.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • LIVE UMR 7362 CNRS (Laboratoire Image Ville Environnement), University of Strasbourg, 67100 Strasbourg, France
Corresponding author
Simoncic, Valentin
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-12-10
Volume
19
Issue
24
Pages
16592
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311133980
Cited by
83
References
272
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Grand Est Region
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
birth outcomes, social determinants of health, maternal socioeconomic status, neighborhood effects, health disparities, fetal well-being, maternal age, maternal education, marital status, pregnancy intention, social status, environmental exposure, psychosocial risk factors
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Care, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Pregnant People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-13, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-13 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.