Cited by 44Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Application of Deep Learning Model in the Sonographic Diagnosis of Uterine Adenomyosis

Open access
Raimondo, Diego, Raffone, Antonio, Aru, Anna Chiara, Giorgi, Matteo, Giaquinto, Ilaria, Spagnolo, Emanuela, Travaglino, Antonio, Galatolo, Federico Andrea +7 more·2023·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Deep Learning (DL) machine for the detection of adenomyosis on uterine ultrasonographic images and compare it to intermediate ultrasound skilled trainees. Methods: Prospective observational study were conducted between 1 and 30 April 2022. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) diagnosis of adenomyosis was investigated by an experienced sonographer on 100 fertile-age patients. Videoclips of the uterine corpus were recorded and sequential ultrasound images were extracted. Intermediate ultrasound-skilled trainees and DL machine were asked to make a diagnosis reviewing uterine images. We evaluated and compared the accuracy, sensitivity, positive predictive value, F1-score, specificity and negative predictive value of the DL model and the trainees for adenomyosis diagnosis. Results: Accuracy of DL and intermediate ultrasound-skilled trainees for the diagnosis of adenomyosis were 0.51 (95% CI, 0.48–0.54) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.60–0.79), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and F1-score of DL were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.38–0.48), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.79–0.85) and 0.46 (0.42–0.50), respectively, whereas intermediate ultrasound-skilled trainees had sensitivity of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.52–0.86), specificity of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.58–0.79) and F1-score of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.43–0.66). Conclusions: In this preliminary study DL model showed a lower accuracy but a higher specificity in diagnosing adenomyosis on ultrasonographic images compared to intermediate-skilled trainees.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph20031724

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raimondo, D., Raffone, A., Aru, A. C., Giorgi, M., Giaquinto, I., Spagnolo, E., Travaglino, A., Galatolo, F. A., Cimino, M. G. C. A., Lenzi, J., Centini, G., Lazzeri, L., Mollo, A., Seracchioli, R., & Casadio, P.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
  • University of Siena (IT)
  • Ospedale G.B. Morgagni - L.Pierantoni (IT)
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES)
  • Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Salerno (IT)
Corresponding author
Raffone, Antonio
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-01-18
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
1724
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4317107488
Cited by
44
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IrInSubria (University of Insubria) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
adenomyosis, uterine adenomyosis, deep learning, transvaginal ultrasound, computer-aided diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy, uterine imaging
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Uterus, Adenomyosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review