Cited by 25Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesCommunity Health and DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and Access

Exploring Community-Based Suicide Prevention in the Context of Rural Australia: A Qualitative Study

Open access
Grattidge, Laura, Hoang, Ha, Mond, Jonathan, Lees, David, Visentin, Denis, Auckland, Stuart·2023·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Suicide rates in rural communities are higher than in urban areas, and communities play a crucial role in suicide prevention. This study explores community-based suicide prevention using a qualitative research design. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups asked participants to explore community-based suicide prevention in the context of rural Australia. Participants recruited ((n = 37; ages 29–72, Mean = 46, SD = 9.56); female 62.2%; lived experience 48.6%) were self-identified experts, working in rural community-based suicide prevention (community services, program providers, research, and policy development) around Australia. Data were thematically analysed, identifying three themes relating to community-based suicide prevention: (i) Community led initiatives; (ii) Meeting community needs; and (iii) Programs to improve health and suicidality. Implementing community-based suicide prevention needs community-level engagement and partnerships, including with community leaders; gatekeepers; community members; people with lived experience; services; and professionals, to “get stuff done”. Available resources and social capital are utilised, with co-created interventions reflecting diverse lifestyles, beliefs, norms, and cultures. The definition of “community”, community needs, issues, and solutions need to be identified by communities themselves. Primarily non-clinical programs address determinants of health and suicidality and increase community awareness of suicide and its prevention, and the capacity to recognise and support people at risk. This study shows how community-based suicide prevention presents as a social innovation approach, seeing suicide as a social phenomenon, with community-based programs as the potential driver of social change, equipping communities with the “know how” to implement, monitor, and adjust community-based programs to fit community needs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph20032644

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies suggest benefits of multi-modal approaches tailored to the farming community, as the aetiology of problems in this community is diverse.

    “These studies suggest the benefits of multi-modal approaches that are tailored to the farming community, as the aetiology of problems in this community is diverse.”

    From Improving the mental health of farmers: what types of remote support are acceptable, feasible, and improve outcomes? A feasibility RCT (2024) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results (§3.3.3) describe varied suicide-prevention approaches chosen according to a target group’s needs, and the Conclusions (§5) call for programs adapted to local rural communities. The paper does not establish benefits specifically for farming communities or describe a diverse aetiology of problems within that community. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [36]Alharahsheh H.H. Pius A. A review of key paradigms: Positivism VS interpretivism Glob. Acad. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2020 2 39 43
  2. [50]Charmaz K. Henwood K. Grounded theory methods for qualitative psychology The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology 2nd ed. Sage Publishing London, UK 2017 238 256

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grattidge, L., Hoang, H., Mond, J., Lees, D., Visentin, D., & Auckland, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Centre for Rural Health, University of Tasmania, Launceston 7250, Australia
Corresponding author
Grattidge, Laura
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-02-01
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
2644
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4318823533
Cited by
25
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • The Australian Rotary Health Research Fund
  • Joan E. Swanson, Rotary Club of Deloraine
  • the Centre for Rural Health, University of Tasmania
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
community-based suicide prevention, rural suicide, rural Australia, community-led initiatives, community needs, social capital, co-created interventions, social innovation, suicide awareness, community partnerships, lived experience
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adult, Aged, Australia, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Rural Population, Suicide, Rural Health Services, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review