Cited by 14Impact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Media and PhilosophyMedia and Digital Communication

The Role of Critical Thinking in Mitigating Social Network Addiction: A Study of TikTok and Instagram Users

Open access
Fabio, Rosa Angela, Iaconis, Stella Maria·2024·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

This study addresses the growing concern of social network (SN) addiction, with a focus on TikTok and Instagram. Guided by the Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT), we explored the motivations (escapism and social interaction), attitudes (critical thinking), and states (flow and sense of belonging) that influence SN use. Our objective was to investigate whether critical thinking acts as a protective factor against SN addiction. A sample of 332 university students completed questionnaires assessing motivations, attitudes, states, and SN addiction. Critical thinking was measured using the Critical Thinking Attitude Scale (CTAS), and critical thinking skills were assessed through the Critical Reasoning Assessment (CRA). Statistical analyses revealed significant associations between motivations, critical thinking, states, and SN addiction. Specifically, critical thinking (CTAS scores) demonstrated a negative correlation with SN addiction (r = −0.34, p < 0.01), indicating that higher critical thinking is associated with lower SN addiction. Regression analysis further indicated that escapism (β = 0.45, p < 0.01) and social interaction (β = 0.31, p < 0.05) positively predicted SN addiction, while critical thinking negatively predicted SN addiction (β = −0.28, p < 0.01). Additionally, states of flow and sense of belonging showed significant positive correlations with SN addiction (r = 0.42, p < 0.01 and r = 0.37, p < 0.01, respectively). These findings highlight the potential of critical thinking as a safeguard against SN addiction. This study offers valuable insights into the intricate dynamics of SN use, with implications for promoting healthier digital engagement. Understanding the factors influencing SN addiction and the roles of motivations, dispositions, and states can inform interventions aimed at fostering responsible and mindful online behaviors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph21101305

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Instagram's design elements are purposefully crafted to exploit cognitive and emotional vulnerabilities.

    “One of the key drivers of Instagram addiction lies in its design elements, which are purposefully crafted to exploit cognitive and emotional vulnerabilities.”

    From The Scrolling Paradox: Analyzing Instagram Addiction Patterns in The Digital Age (2025) · cites this paper as Fabio & Iaconis 2024

    The Introduction links Instagram addiction to content updates and image curation, and discusses susceptibility to manipulative social-network algorithms. It does not say that Instagram’s design elements were purposefully crafted to exploit cognitive and emotional vulnerabilities. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Features such as infinite scrolling, algorithm-driven content, and push notifications are engineered to trigger the brain's dopaminergic reward system, encouraging continued engagement with Instagram.

    “Features such as infinite scrolling, algorithm-driven content, and push notifications are engineered to trigger the brain's dopaminergic reward system, encouraging users to continue engaging with the platform (Yousef et al. 2025;Fabio & Iaconis 2024).”

    From The Scrolling Paradox: Analyzing Instagram Addiction Patterns in The Digital Age (2025) · cites this paper as Fabio & Iaconis 2024

    The Introduction describes flow during social-network use as intrinsically rewarding and links expected gratification to continued platform use. The Discussion reports an association between flow and extended use of TikTok and Instagram, but explicitly avoids causal claims. Neither section supports the specific assertion that infinite scrolling, algorithm-driven content, or push notifications are engineered to trigger a dopaminergic reward system. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Social media addiction refers to compulsive and maladaptive behaviors such as frequent checking, content consumption, and engagement on platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter.

    “A prominent subtype within this framework is social media addiction, which refers to compulsive and maladaptive behaviors such as frequent checking, content consumption, and engagement on platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter (Sarialioğlu & Oluç 2024;Fabio & Iaconis 2024;Arslan et al. 2025).”

    From The Scrolling Paradox: Analyzing Instagram Addiction Patterns in The Digital Age (2025) · cites this paper as Fabio & Iaconis 2024

    The Introduction describes social media addiction as an uncontrollable desire to stay online that can displace other parts of life, and links Instagram addiction to a need for content updates. The Measurement Instruments section includes an item about needing to use Instagram repeatedly. The paper focuses on Instagram and TikTok; it does not substantiate the claim’s examples of Facebook and Twitter. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The identification of Instagram's design elements as primary addiction drivers (36.6% of themes) aligns with Yousef et al. (2025) and Fabio & Iaconis (2024), who emphasized how algorithm-driven content and push notifications trigger dopaminergic reward systems.

    “Our identification of Instagram's design elements as primary addiction drivers (36.6% of themes) aligns with Yousef et al. (2025) and Fabio & Iaconis (2024), who emphasized how algorithm-driven content and push notifications trigger dopaminergic reward systems.”

    From The Scrolling Paradox: Analyzing Instagram Addiction Patterns in The Digital Age (2025) · cites this paper as Fabio & Iaconis (2024)

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Instagram's gamification strategies resemble the reward mechanisms seen in gambling, encouraging compulsive use, especially among younger users.

    “These behaviors are compounded by Instagram's gamification strategies, which resemble the reward mechanisms seen in gambling, encouraging compulsive use, especially among younger users (Fabio & Iaconis 2024).”

    From The Scrolling Paradox: Analyzing Instagram Addiction Patterns in The Digital Age (2025) · cites this paper as Fabio & Iaconis 2024

    The Introduction links Instagram addiction to repeated content updates, and the Results report an association between Instagram addiction and rewarding flow experiences. However, the paper does not describe Instagram’s features as gambling-like gamification or show that they encourage compulsive use especially among younger users; its Discussion cautions that the findings are correlational. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. [1]Graciyal D.G. Viswam D. Social Media and Emotional Well-being: Pursuit of Happiness or Pleasure Asia Pac. Media Educ. 2021 31 99 115 10.1177/1326365X211003737 · DOI
  2. [4]Sánchez-Fernández M. Bordá-Más M. e Mora-Merchán J.A. Problematic internet use by university students and associated predictive factors: A systematic review Comput. Hum. Behav. 2023 139 107532 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107532 PMC9707285 36465425 · DOI
  3. [8]Anghel E. Braun H.I. Friedman A.A. Baez-Cruz M. College Students’ Critical Thinking: Assessment and Interpretation J. High. Educ. Theory Pract. 2021 21 10.33423/jhetp.v21i10.4624 · DOI
  4. [20]Guay F. Applying self-determination theory to education: Regulations types, psychological needs, and autonomy supporting behaviors Can. J. Sch. Psychol. 2022 37 75 92 10.1177/08295735211055355 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [21]Iannizzotto G. Nucita A. Fabio R.A. Caprì T. Bello L. Remote eye-tracking for cognitive telerehabilitation and interactive school tasks in times of COVID-19 Information 2020 11 296 10.3390/info11060296 · DOI
  6. [22]Han D.I.D. Bergs Y. Moorhouse N. Virtual reality consumer experience escapes: Preparing for the metaverse Virtual Real. 2022 26 1443 1458 10.1007/s10055-022-00641-7 · DOI
  7. [23]Guo J. Liu Z. Liu Y. Key success factors for the launch of government social media platform: Identifying the formation mechanism of continuance intention Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016 55 750 763 10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.004 · DOI
  8. [25]Chylińska D. Escape? But where? About ‘escape tourism’ Tour. Stud. 2022 22 262 289 10.1177/14687976221092220 · DOI
  9. [27]Conner M. van Harreveld F. Norman P. Attitude stability as a moderator of the relationships between cognitive and affective attitudes and behaviour Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2022 61 121 142 10.1111/bjso.12473 34117794 · DOI
  10. [28]Fabio R.A. Croce A. Calabrese C. Critical thinking in ethical and neutral settings in gifted children and non-gifted children Children 2023 10 74 10.3390/children10010074 PMC9856652 36670625 · DOI
  11. [29]Fabio R.A. Stracuzzi A. Lo Faro R. Problematic Smartphone Use Leads to Behavioral and Cognitive Self-Control Deficits Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022 19 7445 10.3390/ijerph19127445 35742695 PMC9223448 · DOI
  12. [30]Fabio R.A. Suriano R. The Influence of Smartphone Use on Tweens’ Capacity for Complex Critical Thinking Children 2023 10 698 10.3390/children10040698 37189947 PMC10136902 · DOI
  13. [31]Van Harreveld F. van der Pligt J. Attitudes as stable and transparent constructions J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2004 40 666 674 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.12.004 · DOI
  14. [32]Pérez A. Potocki A. Stadtler M. Macedo-Rouet M. Paul J.M. Salmerón L. Rouet J. Fostering teenagers’ assessment of information reliability: Effects of a classroom intervention focused on critical source dimensions Learn. Instr. 2018 58 53 64 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.006 · DOI
  15. [33]Bürger M. Schlögl S. Schmid-Petri H. Conflict dynamics in collaborative knowledge production. A study of network gatekeeping on Wikipedia Soc. Netw. 2023 72 13 21 10.1016/j.socnet.2022.08.002 · DOI
  16. [34]Eg R. Demirkol Tønnesen Ö. Tennfjord M.K. A scoping review of personalized user experiences on social media: The interplay between algorithms and human factors Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 2023 9 100253 10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100253 · DOI
  17. [35]Sternberg R.J. Halpern D.F. Critical Thinking in Psychology Second Edition Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 2020
  18. [36]Manassero-Mas M. Salvo A.M. Vázquez-Alonso Á. Development of an instrument to assess young people’s attitudes toward critical thinking Think. Ski. Creat. 2022 45 101100 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101100 · DOI
  19. [37]Gao W. Liu Z. Li J. How does social presence influence SNS addiction? A belongingness theory perspective Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017 77 347 355 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.002 · DOI
  20. [39]Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi Springer Dordrecht, The Netherlands 2014
  21. [40]Zhang Y.L. Li S. Yu G.L. The longitudinal relationship between boredom proneness and mobile phone addiction: Evidence from a cross-lagged model Curr. Psychol. 2022 41 8821 8828 10.1007/s12144-020-01333-8 · DOI
  22. [41]Christianson K.L. Emotional intelligence and critical thinking in nursing students: Integrative review of literature Nurse Educ. 2020 45 62 65 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000801 32091477 · DOI
  23. [43]Mayer J.D. Caruso D.R. Salovey P. The ability model of emotional intelligence: Principles and updates Emot. Rev. 2016 8 290 300 10.1177/1754073916639667 · DOI
  24. [44]Yao X. Yuan S. Yang W. Chen Q. Wei D. Hou Y. Yang D. Emotional intelligence moderates the relationship between regional gray matter volume in the bilateral temporal pole and critical thinking disposition Brain Imaging Behav. 2018 12 488 498 10.1007/s11682-017-9701-3 28357535 · DOI
  25. [47]Hwang G.-J. Chen N.-S. Editorial Position Paper: Exploring the Potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: Applications, Challenges, and Future Research Directions Educ. Technol. Soc. 2023 26 10.30191/ETS.202304_26(2).0014 · DOI
  26. [48]Facione P.A. Facione N.C. The California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory(CCTDI), and the CCTDI Test Manual California Academic Press Millbrae, CA, USA 1994
  27. [50]Andreassen C.S. Griffiths M.D. Hetland J. Pallesen S. Development of a work addiction scale Scand. J. Psychol. 2012 53 265 272 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00947.x 22490005 · DOI
  28. [51]Hayes A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. A Regression-Based Approach Guilford Press New York, NY, USA 2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fabio, R. A., & Iaconis, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Messina (IT)
Corresponding author
Fabio, Rosa Angela
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-09-30
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
1305
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402996808
Cited by
14
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4
FWCI
10.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social network addiction, critical thinking, TikTok, Instagram, uses and gratifications theory, escapism, social interaction, flow experience, sense of belonging, university students, digital well-being, online behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Thinking, Behavior, Addictive, Young Adult, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review