Cited by 305Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital CommunicationDigital Marketing and Social Media

Uses and gratifications sought by pre-adolescent and adolescent TikTok consumers

Bucknell Bossen, Christina, Kottasz, Rita·2020·Young Consumers

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper was to explore the uses and gratifications sought by the primary target market (pre-adolescent and adolescent groups) of a new social media site, TikTok. The paper also sought to identify how much of a role the motivations of self-expression, social recognition and fame-seeking (important considerations within adolescent psychology development) played in the use of this particular social networking sites (SNS). Design/methodology/approach: Following meticulous sampling procedures, ensuring national representation and stringent ethical practices, self-completion questionnaires were sent to pupils at 60 schools in the five key administrative regions of Denmark. The data was examined using analysis of variation tests, followed by a two-step cluster analysis using the log-likelihood method. Findings: The findings indicated that passive consumptive behaviours were prevalent among both pre-adolescent and adolescent groups and that the gratification of entertainment/affect was the primary driver behind all behaviours: passive consumptive, participatory and contributory. Pre-adolescent groups were more active and heavier users of TikTok than were adolescents. In line with adolescent psychology theories, the authors found that contributory behaviours were motivated by a wish to expand one’s social networks, by fame-seeking, self-expression and identity-creation needs. Social implications: Pre-adolescent consumers are heavier users and interact more with the TikTok SNS than adolescent consumers, including in relation to seeking out new social networks. This is potentially of great concern as children are less likely to understand the hidden dangers of online predatorial and privacy issues. Originality/value: The authors extend their understanding of the contributory functions of SNS. Motivations of fame-seeking, self-expression and social recognition are key to understanding the uses and gratifications of TikTok consumers, especially during the adolescent years; contrary to scholarly assertions that these motives are often unconscious, the sample of this study assertively and explicitly confirmed these needs. A further novel insight of this study was that both the gratifications of relationship building and relationship maintenance were sought out via the contributory, rather than the participatory function of TikTok.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/yc-07-2020-1186

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bucknell Bossen and Kottasz (2020) found that self-expression, social recognition and fame-seeking were stimulating factors of contributory behavior.

    “whereas self-expression, social recognition and fame-seeking were identified as stimulating factors of contributory behavior.”
  • Bucknell Bossen and Kottasz (2020) found that identity-creation, social recognition and desire for social network expansion were motivators of participatory behavior.

    “Additionally, identity-creation, social recognition and the desire for social network expansion were found to be motivators of participatory behavior”
  • Bucknell Bossen and Kottasz (2020) found that entertainment/affect was the primary driver behind all categories of TikTok behaviors among pre-adolescents and adolescents in Denmark, with emphasis on passive consumption.

    “they came to the conclusion that entertainment/affect was the primary driver behind all categories of behaviors, with the emphasis on passive consumption.”
  • Eleven studies used self-developed questionnaires for outcome evaluation, of which only six paired it with standardized measures.

    “Eleven studies used self-developed questionnaires for outcome evaluation [42, 67–72, 74, 80–82], of which only six paired it with standardized measures [67–69, 71, 72, 80, 81].”
  • Ten studies differentiated the population between active and passive users, while only one conducted a content analysis of posts, hashtags, or videos.

    “Given that, ten studies differentiated the population between active and passive users [42, 67, 70, 72, 74–79], while only one conducted a content analysis of the posts, hashtags, or videos [78].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bucknell Bossen, C., & Kottasz, R.
Venue
Young Consumers
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-11-30
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
463-478
ISSN
1747-3616 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3109216653
Cited by
305
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 20
FWCI
45.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
TikTok, uses and gratifications theory, preadolescents, adolescents, social networking sites, self-expression, fame-seeking, social recognition, passive consumption, entertainment gratification, relationship building, online privacy, online predators, identity construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review