The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant Defense against Insect Herbivores
Open accessAbstract
Plants have been interacting with insects for several hundred million years, leading to complex defense approaches against various insect feeding strategies. Some defenses are constitutive while others are induced, although the insecticidal defense compound or protein classes are often similar. Insect herbivory induce several internal signals from the wounded tissues, including calcium ion fluxes, phosphorylation cascades and systemic- and jasmonate signaling. These are perceived in undamaged tissues, which thereafter reinforce their defense by producing different, mostly low molecular weight, defense compounds. These bioactive specialized plant defense compounds may repel or intoxicate insects, while defense proteins often interfere with their digestion. Volatiles are released upon herbivory to repel herbivores, attract predators or for communication between leaves or plants, and to induce defense responses. Plants also apply morphological features like waxes, trichomes and latices to make the feeding more difficult for the insects. Extrafloral nectar, food bodies and nesting or refuge sites are produced to accommodate and feed the predators of the herbivores. Meanwhile, herbivorous insects have adapted to resist plant defenses, and in some cases even sequester the compounds and reuse them in their own defense. Both plant defense and insect adaptation involve metabolic costs, so most plant-insect interactions reach a stand-off, where both host and herbivore survive although their development is suboptimal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Caspi, R., Billington, R., Ferrer, L., Foerster, H., Fulcher, C. A., Keseler, I. M., Kothari, A., Krummenacker, M., Latendresse, M., Mueller, L. A., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1164 · Cited by 3,395
Plant resistance towards insect herbivores: a dynamic interaction
Gatehouse, J. A. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00519.x · Cited by 704
Bi, J. L., & Felton, G. W. (1995) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf02035149 · Cited by 376
Morton, R. L., Schroeder, H. E., Bateman, K. S., Chrispeels, M. J., Armstrong, E., & Higgins, T. J. V. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.070054597 · Cited by 262
Cited by
Biological Activities of Essential Oils: From Plant Chemoecology to Traditional Healing Systems
Sharifi-Rad, J., Sureda, A., Tenore, G., Daglia, M., Sharifi-Rad, M., Valussi, M., Tundis, R., Sharifi-Rad, M., Loizzo, M., Ademiluyi, A., et al. (2017) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules22010070 · Cited by 889
Borges, A., Abreu, A., Dias, C., Saavedra, M., Borges, F., & Simões, M. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21070877 · Cited by 308
Jasmonates: Biosynthesis, perception and signal transduction
Griffiths, G. (2020) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20190085 · Cited by 103
Masui, N., Agathokleous, E., Mochizuki, T., Tani, A., Matsuura, H., & Koike, T. (2021) · Journal of Forestry Research · doi:10.1007/s11676-020-01287-4 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Fürstenberg-Hägg, J., Zagrobelny, M., & Bak, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2013-05-16
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 10242-10297
- ISSN
- 1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103353162
- Cited by
- 929
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 40.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant Defense against Insect Herbivores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijms140510242
- The paper
- Fürstenberg-Hägg, J., Zagrobelny, M., & Bak, S. (2013). Plant Defense against Insect Herbivores. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140510242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.