Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 744

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Structure-Based Drug Discovery Paradigm

Open access
Batool, Maria, Ahmad, Bilal, Choi, Sangdun·2019·International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract

Structure-based drug design is becoming an essential tool for faster and more cost-efficient lead discovery relative to the traditional method. Genomic, proteomic, and structural studies have provided hundreds of new targets and opportunities for future drug discovery. This situation poses a major problem: the necessity to handle the “big data” generated by combinatorial chemistry. Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning play a pivotal role in the analysis and systemization of larger data sets by statistical machine learning methods. Advanced AI-based sophisticated machine learning tools have a significant impact on the drug discovery process including medicinal chemistry. In this review, we focus on the currently available methods and algorithms for structure-based drug design including virtual screening and de novo drug design, with a special emphasis on AI- and deep-learning-based methods used for drug discovery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijms20112783

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 121 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 2007, Drug evaluation: Prx-00023, a selective 5-ht1a receptor agonist for depression, Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs, 8, 78
  2. Grant, 2009, Protein structure prediction in structure-based ligand design and virtual screening, Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen., 12, 940, 10.2174/138620709789824718 · doi:10.2174/138620709789824718
  3. Lameijer, 2007, Designing active template molecules by combining computational de novo design and human chemist’s expertise, J. Med. Chem, 50, 1925, 10.1021/jm061356+ · doi:10.1021/jm061356+
  4. Tang, 2006, New technologies in computer-aided drug design: Toward target identification and new chemical entity discovery, Drug Discov. Today Technol., 3, 307, 10.1016/j.ddtec.2006.09.004 · doi:10.1016/j.ddtec.2006.09.004
  5. Roy, K. (2019). Chapter 2—computational drug design methods—current and future perspectives. In silico drug design, Academic Press.
  6. Secchi, 2018, On the role of statistics in the era of big data: A call for a debate, Stat. Probab. Lett., 136, 10, 10.1016/j.spl.2018.02.041 · doi:10.1016/j.spl.2018.02.041
  7. Kuritzkes, 2008, Maraviroc, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 7, 15, 10.1038/nrd2490 · doi:10.1038/nrd2490
  8. Suthaharan, S. (2016). Support vector machine. Machine Learning Models and Algorithms for Big Data Classification: Thinking with Examples for Effective Learning, Springer US.

Cited by

See all 744

Metadata

Authors
Batool, M., Ahmad, B., & Choi, S.
Venue
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-06-06
Volume
20
Issue
11
Pages
2783
ISSN
1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948831670
Cited by
744
References
121
FWCI
41.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2019R1H1A2039674)
  • Ministry of Science and ICT (2018K000369)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Structure-Based Drug Discovery Paradigm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijms20112783
The paper
Batool, M., Ahmad, B., & Choi, S. (2019). A Structure-Based Drug Discovery Paradigm. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20112783

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.