Cited by 26Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

A Novel Neurofilament Light Chain ELISA Validated in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia, and Subjective Cognitive Decline, and the Evaluation of Candidate Proteins for Immunoassay Calibration

Open access
Das, Shreyasee, Dewit, Nele, Jacobs, Dirk, Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L., In ‘t Veld, Sjors G. J. G., Coppens, Salomé, Quaglia, Milena, Hirtz, Christophe +2 more·2022·International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Neurofilament light chain (Nf-L) is a well-known biomarker for axonal damage; however, the corresponding circulating Nf-L analyte in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is poorly characterized. We therefore isolated new monoclonal antibodies against synthetic peptides, and these monoclonals were characterized for their specificity on brain-specific intermediate filament proteins. Two highly specific antibodies, ADx206 and ADx209, were analytically validated for CSF applications according to well-established criteria. Interestingly, using three different sources of purified Nf-L proteins, a significant impact on interpolated concentrations was observed. With a lower limit of analytical sensitivity of 100 pg/mL using bovine Nf-L as the calibrator, we were able to quantify the Nf-L analyte in each sample, and these Nf-L concentrations were highly correlated to the Uman diagnostics assay (Spearman rho = 0.97, p < 0.001). In the clinical diagnostic groups, the new Nf-L ELISA could discriminate patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD, n = 20) from those with frontotemporal lobe dementia (FTD, n = 20) and control samples with subjective cognitive decline (SCD, n = 20). Henceforth, this novel Nf-L ELISA with well-defined specificity and epitopes can be used to enhance our understanding of harmonizing the use of Nf-L as a clinically relevant marker for neurodegeneration in CSF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijms23137221

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [35]Jacobs D. The Evaluation of Novel Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Different Forms of Neurofilament Light in Brain and CSF Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321058365 (accessed on 5 August 2021)
  2. [36]Jacobs D. Dewit N. De Vos A. Bjerke M. Engelborghs S. Vanmechelen E. A Neurofilament Light immunoassay targeting the Coil2 region as a biomarker for neurodegeneration Novel Nf-L Coil2 mAbs and their characteristics Background Objectives ADPD Conf. 2019 76 187

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Das, S., Dewit, N., Jacobs, D., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., In ‘t Veld, S. G. J. G., Coppens, S., Quaglia, M., Hirtz, C., Teunissen, C. E., & Vanmechelen, E.
Affiliations
  • ADx NeuroSciences (BE)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Department of Clinical Chemistry, Neurochemistry Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Neuroscience Neurodegeneration, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • LGC (GB)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Vanmechelen, Eugeen
Venue
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-06-29
Volume
23
Issue
13
Pages
7221
ISSN
1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4284994448
Cited by
26
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Union’s Horizon 2020 research (860197)
  • innovation program Marie Curie ITN ‘MIRIADE’ (860197)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
neurofilament light chain, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, ELISA, monoclonal antibodies, Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, subjective cognitive decline, immunoassay calibration, neurodegeneration, axonal injury, diagnostic discrimination
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Calibration, Cattle, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Humans, Intermediate Filaments, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Neurofilament Proteins, Pick Disease of the Brain, Frontotemporal Dementia, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review