Cited by 546Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals

A practical guide to immunoassay method validation

Open access
Andreasson, Ulf, Perret-Liaudet, Armand, van Waalwijk van Doorn, Linda J. C., Blennow, Kaj, Chiasserini, Davide, Engelborghs, Sebastiaan, Fladby, Tormod, Genc, Sermin +13 more·2015·Frontiers in Neurology

Abstract

Biochemical markers have a central position in the diagnosis and management of patients in clinical medicine, and also in clinical research and drug development, also for brain disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is frequently used for measurement of low-abundance biomarkers. However, the quality of ELISA methods varies, which may introduce both systematic and random errors. This urges the need for more rigorous control of assay performance, regardless of its use in a research setting, in clinical routine, or drug development. The aim of a method validation is to present objective evidence that a method fulfills the requirements for its intended use. Although much has been published on which parameters to investigate in a method validation, less is available on a detailed level on how to perform the corresponding experiments. To remedy this, standard operating procedures (SOPs) with step-by-step instructions for a number of different validation parameters is included in the present work together with a validation report template, which allow for a well-ordered presentation of the results. Even though the SOPs were developed with the intended use for immunochemical methods and to be used for multicenter evaluations, most of them are generic and can be used for other technologies as well.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fneur.2015.00179

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]CLSI. Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement. methods; approved guideline-second edition. In: Wilhelm DM, editor. CLSI Document EP05-A2. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2004). p. 1–39.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andreasson, U., Perret-Liaudet, A., van Waalwijk van Doorn, L. J. C., Blennow, K., Chiasserini, D., Engelborghs, S., Fladby, T., Genc, S., Kruse, N., Kuiperij, H. B., Kulic, L., Lewczuk, P., Mollenhauer, B., Mroczko, B., Parnetti, L., Vanmechelen, E., Verbeek, M. M., Winblad, B., Zetterberg, H., Koel-Simmelink, M., & Teunissen, C. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • University of Perugia (IT)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • Medical University of Białystok (PL)
  • ADx NeuroSciences (BE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Frontiers in Neurology
Published
2015-08-19
Volume
6
Pages
179-179
ISSN
1664-2295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1789015615
Cited by
546
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 2
FWCI
22.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Research Centre
  • EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research
  • ZonMw
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Belgian Federal Science Policy Office
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Ministero della Salute
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • Universiteit Antwerpen
  • Vlaamse regering
  • Fondation pour la Recherche sur Alzheimer
  • Krajowy Naukowy Osrodek Wiodacy
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Keywords
ELISA, standard operating procedures, biochemical markers, biomarkers, multicenter evaluation, Alzheimer's disease, immunochemical methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review