Cited by 53Advanced Text Analysis TechniquesBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesTopic Modeling

Automatic Text Summarization of Biomedical Text Data: A Systematic Review

Open access
Chaves, Andrea, Kesiku, Cyrille, Garcia-Zapirain, Begonya·2022·Information

Abstract

In recent years, the evolution of technology has led to an increase in text data obtained from many sources. In the biomedical domain, text information has also evidenced this accelerated growth, and automatic text summarization systems play an essential role in optimizing physicians’ time resources and identifying relevant information. In this paper, we present a systematic review in recent research of text summarization for biomedical textual data, focusing mainly on the methods employed, type of input data text, areas of application, and evaluation metrics used to assess systems. The survey was limited to the period between 1st January 2014 and 15th March 2022. The data collected was obtained from WoS, IEEE, and ACM digital libraries, while the search strategies were developed with the help of experts in NLP techniques and previous systematic reviews. The four phases of a systematic review by PRISMA methodology were conducted, and five summarization factors were determined to assess the studies included: Input, Purpose, Output, Method, and Evaluation metric. Results showed that 3.5% of 801 studies met the inclusion criteria. Moreover, Single-document, Biomedical Literature, Generic, and Extractive summarization proved to be the most common approaches employed, while techniques based on Machine Learning were performed in 16 studies and Rouge (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation) was reported as the evaluation metric in 26 studies. This review found that in recent years, more transformer-based methodologies for summarization purposes have been implemented compared to a previous survey. Additionally, there are still some challenges in text summarization in different domains, especially in the biomedical field in terms of demand for further research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/info13080393

Cites

71 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most authors focused on summarization of radiology reports, i.e., on the creation of a shorter version that includes all important aspects at the same level of text complexity.

    “So far, most authors focused on summarization of radiology reports, i.e., on the creation of a shorter version that includes all important aspects at the same level of text complexity [23–26].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Aggarwal, C.C., Zhai, C., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 1-10. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Maybury, M. Advances in Automatic Text Summarization; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999.
  3. Jones, K.S.; Galliers, J.R. Evaluating Natural Language Processing Systems: An Analysis and Review; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1996.
  4. Deaton, J. Transformers and Pointer-Generator Networks for Abstractive Summarization. 2019. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Transformers-and-Pointer-Generator-Networks-for-Deaton/46adc063c1c46e0 2f6457e45503cbb65495f6494 (accessed on 29 June 2022).
  5. Jurafsky, D.; Martin, J.H. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition; Pearson/Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009.
  6. Wang, L.L.; Lo, K.; Chandrasekhar, Y.; Reas, R.; Yang, J.; Burdick, D.; Eide, D.; Funk, K.; Katsis, Y.; Kinney, R.M.; et al. CORD-19: The COVID-19 Open Research Dataset. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on NLP for COVID-19 at ACL 2020, Online; Association for Computational Linguistics: Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaves, A., Kesiku, C., & Garcia-Zapirain, B.
Affiliations
  • eVida Research Group, University of Deusto, Avda/Universidades 24, 48007 Bilbao, Spain
  • Universidad de Deusto (ES)
Venue
Information
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-08-19
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
393
ISSN
2078-2489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4298339612
Cited by
53
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
text summarization, biomedical text, extractive summarization, abstractive summarization, single-document summarization, biomedical literature, transformer-based summarization, medical information retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review