Cited by 11COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

B-Type Natriuretic Peptides and High-Sensitive Troponin I as COVID-19 Survival Factors: Which One Is the Best Performer?

Open access
de Falco, Renato, Vargas, Maria, Palma, Daniela, Savoia, Marcella, Miscioscia, Anna, Pinchera, Biagio, Vano, Martina, Servillo, Giuseppe +2 more·2021·Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract

Increased concentrations of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity troponin I (HsTnI) in COVID-19 patients have already been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate which of these common markers of cardiac disease is the most useful predictor of fatal outcome in COVID-19 patients. One hundred and seventy-four patients affected with COVID-19 were recruited, and markers of cardiac disease and the clinical history of the patients were collected at admission in the infectious disease unit or intensive care unit. NT-proBNP, BNP and HsTnI values were higher in in-hospital non-surviving patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of NT-proBNP, BNP and HsTnI was performed, with NT-proBNP (AUC = 0.951) and HsTnI (AUC = 0.947) being better performers (p = 0.01) than BNP (AUC = 0.777). Logistic regression was performed assessing the relation of HsTnI and NT-proBNP to fatal outcome adjusting for age and gender, with only NT-proBNP being significant. The population was then divided into two groups, one with higher NT-proBNP values at admission than the cut-off resulted from the ROC curve (511 ng/L) and a second one with lower values. The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed an absence of fatal outcome in the group of patients with NT-proBNP values lower than the cut-off (p < 0.001). NT-proBNP proved to be the best prognostic tool for fatal outcome among markers of cardiac disease in COVID-19 patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcm10122726

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with severe COVID-19, elevated biomarkers of cardiac damage that predict heart failure including troponins and NT-proBNP were strongly and independently associated with in-hospital mortality.

    “In patients with severe COVID-19, elevated biomarkers of cardiac damage that predict heart failure including troponins and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) were strongly and independently associated with in-hospital mortality.”

    From COVID-19, Myocarditis and Pericarditis (2023) · cites this paper as [72]

    The Results and Discussion (page numbers not provided) report higher NT-proBNP and high-sensitivity troponin I in patients who died in hospital. However, only NT-proBNP remained significant after adjustment for age and sex, so the paper does not support calling both markers independent predictors; most enrolled patients were also non-critical rather than severe cases. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Musher, D.M.; Abers, M.S.; Corrales-Medina, V.F. Acute Infection and Myocardial Infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 171-176.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Falco, R., Vargas, M., Palma, D., Savoia, M., Miscioscia, A., Pinchera, B., Vano, M., Servillo, G., Gentile, I., & Fortunato, G.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biochemistry and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • CEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate Franco Salvatore (Italy) (IT)
  • Federico II University Hospital (IT)
Corresponding author
Fortunato, Giuliana
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-06-21
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
2726
ISSN
2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3177486256
Cited by
11
References
31
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, brain natriuretic peptide, NT-proBNP, high-sensitivity troponin I, cardiac biomarkers, mortality prediction, prognostic factors, in-hospital mortality, SARS-CoV-2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review