Cited by 9Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Clients in Simulated Teletherapy via Videoconference Compensate for Altered Eye Contact When Evaluating Therapist Empathy

Open access
Grondin, Frédéric, Lomanowska, Anna M., Poiré, Vincent, Jackson, Philip L.·2022·Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract

Eye contact is frequently associated with an increased perception of empathy and telepresence, but the currently used videoconferencing (VC) technologies diminish the possibility of naturally conveying eye contact. This study compared the empathy, telepresence, and eye gaze patterns of clients in simulated VC teletherapy sessions where eye contact was altered or facilitated. Forty-two would-be clients met with one of four therapists in training for one 20-min simulated teletherapy session taking place via VC. The session either altered or facilitated eye contact perception by manipulating the positioning of the webcams and of the clients in their chair. Eye-tracking data focusing on the eyes, face, and general body regions of interest were obtained for 25 clients. The results show that facilitating eye contact in VC did not increase the clients’ perceptions of empathy or telepresence. However, empathy was associated with greater time spent looking at the eyes and faces of the therapists, but only in the sessions facilitating eye contact. We suggest that clients successfully rely on other verbal and nonverbal cues to detect therapist empathy when eye contact is altered in teletherapy sessions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcm11123461

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Neureiter K. Moser C. Tscheligi M. Look into My Eyes & See, What You Mean to Me. Social Presence as Source for Social Capital Int. Conf. Soc. Inform. 2014 8851 183 198

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grondin, F., Lomanowska, A. M., Poiré, V., & Jackson, P. L.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Jackson, Philip L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-06-16
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
3461
ISSN
2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283067753
Cited by
9
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (RGPIN-2019-06715)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
external beam radiotherapy, videoconferencing, eye contact, therapist empathy, perceived empathy, telepresence, gaze patterns, eye tracking, nonverbal cues

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review