Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 33Sports injuries and preventionExercise and Physiological ResponsesMuscle metabolism and nutrition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 119 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Youth and Adolescent Athlete Musculoskeletal Health: Dietary and Nutritional Strategies to Optimise Injury Prevention and Support Recovery

Open access
Alcock, Rebekah, Hislop, Matthew, Vidgen, Helen Anna, Desbrow, Ben·2024·Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology

Abstract

Background: Despite the well-documented benefits of exercise and sports participation, young athletes are particularly vulnerable to musculoskeletal injuries. This is especially true during periods of rapid growth, sports specialisation, and high training loads. While injuries are an inevitable aspect of sports participation, the risk can be minimised by promoting the development of strong, resilient tissues through proper nutrition and injury prevention strategies. Moreover, targeted nutrition strategies can accelerate recovery and rehabilitation, allowing for a quicker return to sports participation. Methods: This narrative review synthesises scientific evidence with practical insights to offer comprehensive dietary recommendations aimed at strengthening tissues and supporting the healing process during recovery and rehabilitation. The selection of all sources cited and synthesised in this narrative review were agreed upon by contributing author consensus, experts in sports nutrition (R.A., H.V., B.D.) and exercise and sports medicine (M.H.). Results: Key topics include factors that contribute to injury susceptibility, general dietary recommendations for growth and development, sports nutrition guidelines, and nutrition considerations during injury and rehabilitation. This review also addresses external factors that may lead to suboptimal nutrition, such as food literacy and eating disorders. Conclusions: By highlighting these factors, this article aims to equip coaches, nutritionists, dietitians, athletic trainers, physical therapists, parents/guardians, sporting organisations, and schools with essential knowledge to implement effective nutritional strategies for injury prevention, recovery, and rehabilitation, ultimately enhancing long-term health and athletic performance.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This narrative review synthesises evidence and practical guidance on nutrition for youth and adolescent athletes to reduce musculoskeletal injury risk and support recovery. It covers growth-related nutrient demands, low energy availability/relative energy deficiency in sport (LEA/REDs), post-injury nutrition, collagen strategies, and psychosocial determinants including food literacy and eating disorders.

Key findings

  • Injury burden and risk factors: reports include 2.29 injuries per 1000 athletic exposures in US high school athletes (2015–2019), 2.6 million US emergency room visits for sports-related injuries in 2001, 18,700 Australian child/adolescent sport/exercise/recreation injuries in 2021–2022, and 33–41% of Canadian youth reporting at least one serious sport injury requiring medical attention (data from 2003, 2005, 2007). Risk factors include growth periods, early sports specialisation, high training loads, and inadequate dietary intake.
  • Growth and nutrient demands: total bone mineral content increases can reach 1.1 g/day, and lean body mass gains can reach ~2.3 g/day in females and ~3.8 g/day in males, a threefold increase from the prepubertal period. Energy deposited in growing tissues is estimated at ~2.0 kcal/gram of daily weight gain (e.g., a 15-year-old male gaining 6 kg/year ≈ 33 kcal/day). Adequate energy, protein, calcium, vitamin D, iron, and zinc are emphasised for musculoskeletal resilience.
  • Post-injury nutrition: trauma or surgery elevates resting metabolic rate by 20–50%; early energy needs increase despite reduced activity. The review suggests carbohydrate intake in the lower range of standard sports nutrition recommendations (3–5 g/kg body mass) and protein distribution of 0.3 g/kg body mass across five meals/snacks. It notes preliminary evidence for ~10–15 g gelatine 30–60 min before rehabilitation exercises for connective tissue, but supplementation is generally considered inappropriate for young athletes unless clinically indicated.
  • LEA/REDs and psychosocial factors: LEA/REDs can disrupt growth, bone health, immune function, and mental health, but diagnosis in youth is challenging due to limited research and no standardised criteria. Eating disorders and food literacy influence dietary intake, and practical recommendations include sports nutrition education, parent/guardian involvement, healthy body image promotion, policy advocacy, and access to multidisciplinary healthcare.

Methods

  • Narrative review synthesising scientific evidence with practical insights; topics include injury susceptibility, general dietary recommendations for growth and development, sports nutrition guidelines, nutrition during injury/rehabilitation, and external factors such as food literacy and eating disorders.
  • All cited and synthesised sources were selected by consensus of contributing authors, described as experts in sports nutrition (R.A., H.V., B.D.) and exercise and sports medicine (M.H.).
  • No systematic search strategy, data extraction process, or formal quality appraisal is described in the text.

Limitations

  • Paper-stated limitations: exact youth injury prevalence is difficult to determine due to lack of comprehensive databases, varied sports/ages, and under-reporting; sports-specific nutrition research in youth remains limited; LEA/REDs diagnosis lacks standardised criteria and is challenging; collagen research has been conducted in cell cultures, animal models, and adults, with safety/efficacy in children and adolescents not established; routine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning is not recommended for those under 18.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review with consensus-based source selection, it lacks systematic search and quality appraisal and may be subject to selection bias; many recommendations appear extrapolated from adult or mixed-age evidence because youth-specific data are limited.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jfmk9040221

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 Nutrition considerations for the injured adolescent athlete. Image generated by Microsoft (2024) Copilot [AI software], https://www.microsoft.com/copilot, accessed on 1 July 2024.
Figure 1 Nutrition considerations for the injured adolescent athlete. Image generated by Microsoft (2024) Copilot [AI software], https://www.microsoft.com/copilot, accessed on 1 July 2024.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 87 Not checked · 34 Own results and interpretations

54 more claims

Create a free account to see all 121 claims and to verify the 119 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 26
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 44

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Cited works that were retracted

Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 105 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Maughan, R.J. (2013). How to assess the energy costs of exercise and sport, Chapter 4. The Encylopedia of Sports Medicine, International Olympic Committee (IOC), John Wiley and Sons.
  2. (2024, July 18). Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025, 2020, 164, Available online: https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/Dietary_Guidelines_for_Americans_2020-2025.pdf.

Cited by

See all 33

Metadata

Authors
Alcock, R., Hislop, M., Vidgen, H. A., & Desbrow, B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Brisbane Sports and Exercise Medicine Specialists, Brisbane, QLD 4170, Australia
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Desbrow, Ben
Venue
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-11-05
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
221
ISSN
2411-5142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404064941
Cited by
33
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
youth athletes, musculoskeletal injuries, injury prevention, sports nutrition, injury recovery, rehabilitation nutrition, dietary recommendations, growth and development, training load, food literacy, eating disorders, return to sport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.