Cited by 8Underwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFault Detection and Control SystemsAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems

Fault Tolerant Control in Underwater Vehicles

Open access
Liu, Chang, Filaretov, Vladimir, Zuev, Alexander, Protsenko, Alexander, Zhirabok, Alexey·2024·Journal of Marine Science and Engineering

Abstract

The article discusses the problem of adaptive system synthesis to provide the detection, estimation, and elimination of the negative consequences of faults in the thrusters of underwater robots and deviations of their parameters. For this purpose, an approach consisting of three stages is proposed. At the first stage, based on a bank of diagnostic observers, deviations of the thruster parameters from their nominal values or the occurrence of errors in the readings of its sensors are detected. At the second stage, the magnitudes of the detected deviations and errors are estimated using sliding mode observers. To estimate not only single but also multiple faults, the additional sliding mode observers are used. At the third stage, a control signal is generated to retain the basic dynamic properties of the thruster based on the estimated magnitudes of deviations and errors. Thus, the main contribution of this paper is designing the systems compensating for the consequences of faults occurring in the thrusters of the UR and errors in the readings of the angular velocity sensors. This avoids reducing the accuracy of movement along specified trajectories, as well as preventing accidents that could lead to the loss of the vehicle. The operability and efficiency of the proposed systems were tested using computer simulations and experimental studies on an electro-mechanical stand.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jmse12101836

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In underwater systems, robust actuator uptime is achieved using a 6-DoF model.

    “In underwater systems, robust actuator uptime is achieved using a 6-DoF model [54]”

    From Hybrid Fault-Tolerant Control in Cooperative Robotics: Advances in Resilience and Scalability (2025) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Abstract describes a control system that compensates for thruster faults and retains the thruster’s basic dynamic properties, supporting the general fault-tolerance point. Section 2.1 models an individual thruster rather than identifying a 6-DoF model as the means of achieving actuator uptime; the paper does not establish an uptime guarantee. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ayob, A.F.; Arshad, M.R.; Jamaludin, S.; Ahmad, S.Z.A.S. A Brief Review of Unmanned Underwater Vehicle Human-Machine Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 9th International Conference on Underwater System Technology: Theory and Applications (USYS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 5-6 December 2022; pp. 1-4. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Wang, R.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, L.; Tan, M. Development and Motion Control of Biomimetic Underwater Robots: A Survey. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2022, 52, 833-844. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Zhou, Z.; Liu, J.; Yu, J. A Survey of Underwater Multi-Robot Systems. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2022, 9, 1-18. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Fossen, T.I. Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1999; 494p.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, C., Filaretov, V., Zuev, A., Protsenko, A., & Zhirabok, A.
Affiliations
  • Guangdong Ocean University (CN)
  • Institute of Automation and Control Processes (RU)
  • Institute of Marine Technology Problems of the Far-Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • Far Eastern Federal University (RU)
Corresponding author
Liu, Chang
Venue
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-10-14
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
1836
ISSN
2077-1312 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403390060
Cited by
8
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Marine Science and Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Russian Scientific Foundation (22-19-00392)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Keywords
fault-tolerant control, underwater vehicles, underwater robots, thruster faults, fault detection, fault estimation, sliding mode observer, bank of observers, sensor error compensation, trajectory tracking, adaptive control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review