Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 101

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing Cyber Challenges of Maritime Navigation

Androjna, Andrej, Brcko, Tanja, Pavic, Ivica, Greidanus, Harm·2020·Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
DOI 10.3390/jmse8100776
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper provides a close investigation into the landscape of both cyber threats and actual incidents in the maritime sector, identifying the cyber trends and challenges as they relate to safe navigation and marine shipping. As an important subset of cyber threats that impact many maritime systems, the vulnerabilities of satellite navigation systems, in particular the Global Positioning System (GPS), receive special attention. For this article, a systematic literature review was conducted, complemented by the research and analysis of a specific spoofing event. Analyzing available resources, we might summarize that a shift in mind-set is essential to direct more attention and resources toward cybersecurity as well as the necessity for manufacturers to improve the cybersecurity of their products, as shipping systems currently remain vulnerable to cybercriminals. There is a need for multiple positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) systems onboard maritime vessels to complement GPS-only navigation. The use of multiple satellite navigation constellations, public as well as private, in combination with the terrestrial components of an enhanced LOng-RAnge Navigation (eLoran) system and ports’ laser-based aid system for berthing and docking should provide the shipping industry with the direly needed increased protection from cyber-attackers for the foreseeable future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jmse8100776

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Middleton, 2014, Hide and Seek: Managing Automatic Identification System Vulnerabilities: Proceedings of the Marine Safety and Security Council, Coast Guard, J. Saf. Secur. Sea, 71, 48
  2. Chybowski, L., Gawdzinska, K., and Laskowski, R. (2019). Assessing the Unreliability of Systems during the Early Operation Period of a Ship—A Case Study. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 7. · DOI
  3. Dobryakova, 2018, GNSS spoofing detection using static or rotating single-antenna of a static or moving victim, IEEE Access, 6, 79074, 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2879718 · DOI
  4. Hareide, 2018, Enhancing Navigator Competence by Demonstrating Maritime Cyber Security, J. Navig., 71, 1025, 10.1017/S0373463318000164 · DOI
  5. Kaleem Awan, M.S., and Al Ghamdi, M.A. (2019). Understanding the Vulnerabilities in Digital Components of an Integrated Bridge System (IBS). J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 7. · DOI
  6. Lee, E., Mokashi, A.J., Moon, S.Y., and Kim, G. (2019). The Maturity of Automatic Identification Systems (AIS) and Its Implications for Innovation. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 7. · DOI
  7. Polatidis, 2018, Cyber-attack path discovery in a dynamic supply chain maritime risk management system, Comput. Stand. Interfaces, 56, 74, 10.1016/j.csi.2017.09.006 · DOI
  8. Kalogeraki, 2018, Knowledge management methodology for identifying threats in maritime/ logistics supply chains, Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract., 16, 508, 10.1080/14778238.2018.1486789 · DOI
  9. Kessler, 2018, A Taxonomy Framework for Maritime Cybersecurity: A Demonstration Using the Automatic Identification System, Trans. Nav. Int. J. Mar. Navig. Safety Sea Trans., 12, 429
  10. Lee, 2017, Improving cybersecurity awareness in maritime transport: A way forward, J. Korean Soc. Mar. Eng., 41, 738
  11. Lewis, 2018, Secure GPS Data for Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources: Cross-Layered Integrity Processing and Alerting Service, Navig. J. Inst. Navig., 65, 389, 10.1002/navi.251 · DOI
  12. Shapiro, 2018, Trojan horse risks in the maritime transportation systems sector, J. Trans. Secur., 8, 1
  13. Svilicic, 2019, Raising Awareness on Cyber Security of ECDIS, TransNav Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Trans., 13, 231
  14. Svilicic, 2019, Assessing Ship Cyber Risks: A Framework and Case Study of ECDIS Security, WMU J. Mar. Aff., 18, 509, 10.1007/s13437-019-00183-x · DOI
  15. Svilicic, 2019, Maritime Cyber Risk Management: An Experimental Ship Assessment, J. Navig., 72, 1108, 10.1017/S0373463318001157 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Svilicic, B., Rudan, I., Frančić, V., and Mohović, Đ (2019). Towards a Cyber Secure Shipboard Radar. J. Navig., 73. · DOI
  17. Tam, 2019, MaCRA: A model-based framework for maritime cyber-risk assessment, WMU J. Mar. Aff., 18, 129, 10.1007/s13437-019-00162-2 · DOI
  18. Tsimplis, 2019, Information Technology in Navigation: Problems in Legal Implementation and Liability, J. Navig., 72, 833, 10.1017/S0373463318001030 · DOI
  19. Raicu, 2018, Realities in Maritime Domain Regarding Cyber Security Concept, Adv. Eng. Forum, 27, 221, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.27.221 · DOI
  20. Jensen, 2015, Challenges in Maritime Cyber-Resilience, Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev., 5, 35, 10.22215/timreview/889 · DOI
  21. Babineau, G., Jones, R., and Horowitz, B. (2012, January 13–15). A System-Aware Cyber Security Method for Shipboard Control Systems with a Method Described to Evaluate Cyber Security Solutions. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST), Waltham, MA, USA. · DOI
  22. Glomsvoll, 2017, GNSS Jamming Resilience for Close to Shore Navigation in the Northern Sea, J. Navig., 70, 33, 10.1017/S0373463316000473 · DOI
  23. Direnzo, J., Goward, D.A., and Roberts, F.S. (2015, January 6–8). The Little-Known Challenge of Maritime Cyber Security. Proceedings of the 2015 6th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA), Corfu, Greece. · DOI
  24. Ziebold, R., Romanovas, M., and Gewies, S. (2016, January 12–16). Experimental Evaluation of the Impact of Jamming on Maritime Navigation. Proceedings of the 29th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2016), Portland, OR, USA. · DOI
  25. Thombre, 2018, GNSS threat monitoring and reporting: Past, present, and a proposed future, J. Navig., 71, 513, 10.1017/S0373463317000911 · DOI
  26. Elsobeiey, M.E. (2020). Accuracy Assessment of Satellite-Based Correction Service and Virtual GNSS Reference Station for Hydrographic Surveying. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8. · DOI
  27. Perkovic, 2017, Accommodating larger container vessels using an integrated laser system for approach and berthing, Microprocess. Microsyst., 52, 106, 10.1016/j.micpro.2017.05.015 · DOI
  28. Perkovič, M., Gucma, L., Bilewski, M., Muczynski, B., Dimc, F., Luin, B., Vidmar, P., Lorenčič, V., and Batista, M. (2020). Laser-Based Aid Systems for Berthing and Docking. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8. · DOI
  29. Gucma, L., Bak, A., Jankowski, S., Zalewski, P., and Perkovic, M. (June, January 31). Laser docking system integrated with Pilot Navigation Support System, a background to high precision, fast and reliable vessel docking. Proceedings of the 17th Saint Petersburg International Conference on Integrated Navigation Systems, St. Petersburg, Russia.
  30. Mileski, 2018, Cyberattacks on Ships: A Wicked Problem Approach, Marit. Bus. Rev., 3, 414, 10.1108/MABR-08-2018-0026 · DOI
  31. Tranfield, 2003, Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review* Introduction: The Need for an Evidence-Informed Approach, Br. J. Manag., 14, 207
  32. Milner, 2015, Systematic Reviews, Oncol. Nurs. Forum, 42, 89, 10.1188/15.ONF.89-93 · DOI
  33. Bansal, 2017, Cyber Security: Impact and Preventions, IJSRCSEIT, 2, 1096
  34. ENISA (2020, July 17). Information Sharing and Analysis Centres (ISACs)—Cooperative Models. Available online: https://doi.org/10.2824/549292. · DOI
  35. Jones, K., Tam, K., and Papadaki, M. (2016). Threats and Impacts in Maritime Cyber Security. Eng. Technol. Ref., 1. · DOI
  36. Caponi, 2015, Maritime Cybersecurity: A Growing Threat Goes Unanswered, Intellect. Prop. Technol. Law J., 27, 16
  37. Lagouvardou, S. (2018). Maritime Cyber Security: Concepts, Problems and Models. [Master’ Thesis, Technical University of Denmark]. Available online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3158/103669fe46911b52e55dc7afe82237994036.pdf.
  38. Bartlett, 2015, Enhanced Loran. A Wide-Area Multi-Application PNT Resiliency Solution, GPS World, 26, 58
  39. Johnson, G., Swaszek, P., Hartnett, R., Shalaev, R., and Wiggins, M. (2007, January 16–17). An Evaluation of eLoran as a Backup to GPS. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, Woburn, MA, USA. · DOI
  40. Kala, 2019, Cyber Preparedness in Maritime Industry, Int. J. Sci. Technol. Adv., 5, 19
  41. EMSA (2020, January 20). AIS spoofing incident. Proceedings of the 6th HLSG for Governance of the Digital Maritime System and Services, Brussels, Belgium. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupMeeting&meetingId=18913.
  42. Trimble, D., Monken, J., and Sand, A. (2017, January 7–8). A Framework for Cybersecurity Assessments of Critical Port Infrastructure. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon US), Washington, DC, USA. · DOI
  43. Svilicic, B., Rudan, I., and Jugovi, A. (2019). A Study on Cyber Security Threats in a Shipboard Integrated Navigational System. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 7. · DOI
  44. Filitz, 2019, Maritime port systems cyber security vulnerability, NMIO Tech. Bull., 13, 22
  45. Newberry, 2014, Maritime Critical Infrastructure Cyber Risk: Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Consequences. Proceedings of the Marine Safety and Security Council, Coast. Guard, J. Saf. Secur. Sea, 71, 42
  46. Jie, 2016, GNSS Spoofing Detection: Theoretical Analysis and Performance of the Ratio Test Metric in Open Sky, ICT Express, 2, 37, 10.1016/j.icte.2016.02.006 · DOI
  47. (2020, July 24). Cyber risk and Cybersecurity Countermeasures Supplement. P & I Loss Prevention Bulletin-Vol.48_Full.Pdf. Available online: https://www.piclub.or.jp/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Loss-Prevention-Bulletin-Vol.48_Full.pdf.
  48. (2020, September 09). Hybrid Threats Against Harbours: Workshop at EDA. Available online: https://www.eda.europa.eu/info-hub/press-centre/latest-news/2018/05/30/hybrid-threats-against-harbours-workshop-at-eda.
  49. Radgowski, 2014, Cyberspace—The Imminent Operational Domain. Proceedings of the Marine Safety and Security Council, Coast. Guard J. Saf. Secur. Sea, 71, 18
  50. Jaskolka, 2017, Securing cyber-dependent maritime systems and operations, NMIO Tech. Bull., 12, 4
  51. Tam, 2019, Factors Affecting Cyber Risk in Maritime. In 2019 International Conference on Cyber Situational Awareness, Data Analytics and Assessment (Cyber SA), IEEE, 3, 1
  52. Cerulli, R., Raiconi, A., and Voß, S. (2018). Survey on Short-Term Technology Developments and Readiness Levels for Autonomous Shipping. Computational Logistics, Springer.
  53. Spange, J. (2016). Autonomous Docking for Marine Vessels Using a Lidar and Proximity Sensors. [Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology].

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Androjna, A., Brcko, T., Pavic, I., & Greidanus, H.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Maritime Studies and Transport, University of Ljubljana, 6320 Portorož, Slovenia
  • Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
  • European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-10-03
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
776
ISSN
2077-1312
DOI
10.3390/jmse8100776
Cited by
101
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.