Cited by 23Complex Systems and Decision MakingSustainability and Innovation in BusinessEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

A Model-Based Strategy for Developing Sustainable Cosmetics Small and Medium Industries with System Dynamics

Open access
Amrina, Uly, Hidayatno, Akhmad, Zagloel, T. Yuri M.·2021·Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

Abstract

Global customer consciousness for more sustainable products and government requirements for a more sustainable industry have motivated cosmetics small and medium industries (SMIs) to innovate the strategy by integrating sustainability principles into their manufacturing processes.However, the dynamic complexity of balancing sustainability efforts, stakeholders' interests, and uncertainty in material pricing require a conceptual reference model to help managers and decisionmakers cope with the transition process.This work therefore proposes a model-based strategy using system dynamics to assist managers and stakeholders in SMIs to clarify their possible pathways and to offer a framework to understand, guide, and generate future strategies.In multiactor, multistakeholder conditions, the proposed methodology can provide insights into how stakeholders can effectively intervene to improve sustainability through open innovation dynamics models.The case study presented here on a personal care cosmetics company demonstrates several leverage points and obstacles, thereby allowing each stakeholder to understand their strategic role in realizing sustainable cosmetics SMIs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/joitmc7040225

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The difference in sustainability focus between international and small/medium cosmetic companies is due to lack of resources and holistic understanding of life cycle impact.

    “The reason for this situation is the lack of resources and a holistic understanding of the impact of the life cycle [9,33–36].”

    From Use of Waste from the Food Industry and Applications of the Fermentation Process to Create Sustainable Cosmetic Products: A Review (2024) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Introduction says cosmetics SMIs face sustainability challenges because of their smaller scale, limited workforce skills and old equipment, and that their production focus leads them to neglect environmental impacts. It does not attribute a difference from international companies to a lack of holistic understanding of life-cycle impacts. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • International cosmetic companies pursue initiatives to improve sustainability dimensions holistically across the entire product life cycle, while small or medium local companies focus on natural, green, or organic ingredients.

    “Research shows that international cosmetic companies pursue initiatives to improve sustainability dimensions holistically, taking into account the entire product life cycle, while small or medium local companies focus on the use of natural, green, or organic ingredients as main part of their sustainable products.”

    From Use of Waste from the Food Industry and Applications of the Fermentation Process to Create Sustainable Cosmetic Products: A Review (2024) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses sustainability in cosmetics and says ordinary cosmetics SMIs focus on short-term profits and production-side concerns. It does not compare international companies with local firms, describe life-cycle-wide initiatives by the former, or say the latter focus on natural, green, or organic ingredients. Searches for those terms and the company comparison found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Sahota, A. Sustainability: How the Cosmetics Industry Is Greening Up; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014.
  2. Hidayatno, A.; Rahman, I.; Muliadi, R. Understanding dynamics of green house gases impacts on Jakarta's urban development using model-based policy simulator to support policy making. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Bali, Indonesia, 7-9 January 2014; pp. 1209-1214.
  3. Nallusamy, S.; Dinagaraj, G.B.; Balakannan, K.; Satheesh, S. Sustainable green lean manufacturing practices in small scale industries-A case study. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2015, 10, 143-146.
  4. Johnson, G.; Whittington, R.; Scholes, K.; Angwin, D.; Regnér, P. Exploring Strategy, 9th ed.; Pearson Education: Harlow, UK, 2011.
  5. Kibira, D.; Jain, S.; McLean, C. A system dynamics modeling framework for sustainable manufacturing. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual System Dynamics Society Conference, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 26-30 July 2009; Volume 301, pp. 1-22.
  6. Sterman, J.D. System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for A Complex World; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering System Division: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003.
  7. Sterman, J. Business Dynamics: System Thinking and Modelling for a Complex Word; Irwin/McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  8. Hidayatno, A.; Rahman, I.; Muliadi, R. A system dynamics sustainability model to visualize the interaction Between economic, social, and environmental aspects of Jakarta's urban development. In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Science and Technology Innovation, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2-4 October 2012; pp. 179-183.
  9. Hidayatno, A.; Destyanto, A.R.; Moeis, A.O.; Rizky, M.; Iman, N. Scenario planning using system dynamics for reducing uncertainty on managing employee turnover. In Proceedings of the 2nd Asia-Pacific Region System Dynamics Conference, Singapore, 19-22 February 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amrina, U., Hidayatno, A., & Zagloel, T. Y. M.
Affiliations
University of Indonesia (ID)
Corresponding author
Hidayatno, Akhmad
Venue
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
225
ISSN
2199-8531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3213804857
Cited by
23
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Indonesia (NKB-655/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2020)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
sustainable cosmetics, small and medium industries, system dynamics modeling, sustainability strategy, stakeholder engagement, open innovation, leverage points, personal care industry, transition pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review