Behavioural Responses to Temporary Separation of a Captive Herd of African Elephants (Loxodonta africana)
Open accessAbstract
Elephants are highly intelligent animals with a huge capacity for social cognition, living in large, long-lived, related herds. In captivity, it is extremely difficult to meet all of the species’ ecological needs, as well as those required individual by individual, but improvements are continually being made. After identifying impaired welfare, one collection made the decision to relocate four female African Elephants (Loxodonta africana) to a different facility. As the worlds’ largest land mammal, many safety, welfare, and logistical considerations were undertaken. The elephants travelled in two pairs, a mother–daughter pair and an older unrelated female and a younger unrelated female with a strong social bond. As a result, there was a short gap in between transports, allowing for further habituation to transport crates and the heat of summer. The changes in both social and individual behaviours of the two females remaining when their group was temporarily reduced from four to two were investigated using one-zero sampling. The study determined the daily activities of the elephants comparing ‘before transport’ to ‘after transport’ for the two remaining elephants to establish any changes in their behaviours as a result of this disturbance. Post transport, there was an increase in both human-audible vocalisations and temporal gland secretions, and hugely decreased play behaviour was observed. The dynamic between the remaining pair was also altered with more tactile behaviours from mother to daughter seen but more submission from daughter to mother. This led to the conclusion that the elephants, although mostly unrelated and living in an ‘unnatural’ captive setting, had the same signs of stress and behavioural change as would a highly related group if separated.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inter-zoo transfers increase risk because they can disrupt social groups and break important social bonds.
“Inter-zoo transfers also increase the risk because they can be disruptive to social groups and break important social bonds”
From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as Armstrong & Johnson, 2021
In captivity, it is exceptionally difficult to meet elephants' overall ecological needs, as well as their individual needs.
“In captivity, it is exceptionally difficult to meet elephants' overall ecological needs, as well as their individual needs (Armstrong & Johnson, 2021”
From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as Armstrong & Johnson, 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Amboseli Elephants: A Long-Term Perspective on a Long-Lived Mammal
Moss, C. J., Croze, H., & Lee, P. C. (2011) · University of Chicago Press · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226542263.001.0001 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Greco, B. J., Meehan, C. L., Hogan, J. N., Leighty, K. A., Mellen, J., Mason, G. J., & Mench, J. A. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144276 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Laws, N., Ganswindt, A., Heistermann, M., Harris, M., Harris, S., & Sherwin, C. (2007) · Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science · doi:10.1080/10888700701555600 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Wilson, M. L., Perdue, B. M., Bloomsmith, M. A., & Maple, T. L. (2015) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21229 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Hinde, R.A., Ed.; Blackwell Scientific: Oxford, UK, 1983; pp. 315-325.
- Hoare, R. African elephants and humans in conflict: The outlook for co-existence. Oryx 2000, 34, 34-38. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Cameron, E.; Ryan, S. Welfare at Multiple Scales: Importance of Zoo Elephant Population Welfare in a World of Declining Wild Populations. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158701. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Poulsen, J.R.; Koerner, S.E.; Moore, S.; Medjibe, V.P.; Blake, S.; Clark, C.J.; Akou, M.E.; Fay, M.; Meier, A.; Okouyi, J.; et al. Poaching empties critical Central African wilderness of forest elephants. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, 134-135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Poole, J.; Payne, K.; Langbauer, W.R.; Moss, C. The social contexts of some very low frequency calls of African Elephants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1988, 22, 385-392. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Lee, P.; Moss, C. African Elephant Play, Competence and Social Complexity. Anim. Behav. Cogn. 2016, 1, 144-156. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Lucas, C.; Stanyon, B. Improving the welfare of African elephants Loxodonta africana in zoological institutions through enclosure design and husbandry management: An example from Blair Drummond Safari and Adventure Park. Int. Zoo Yearb. 2017, 51, 248-257. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Williams, E.; Chadwick, C.; Yon, L.; Asher, L. A review of current indicators of welfare in captive elephants (Loxodonta africana and Elephas maximus). Anim. Welf. 2018, 27, 235-249. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Garstang, M. Elephant Sense and Sensibility; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015.
- Barkai, R. Elephants are people, people are elephants: Human-proboscideans similarities as a case for cross cultural animal humanization in recent and Paleolithic times. Quat. Int. 2016, 406, 239-245.
- Chadwick, C.; Williams, E.; Asher, L.; Yon, L. Incorporating stakeholder perspectives into the assessment and provision of captive elephant welfare. Anim. Welf. 2017, 26, 461-472. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Stoinski, T.; Daniel, E.; Maple, T. A preliminary study of the behavioral effects of feeding enrichment on African elephants. Zoo Biol. Publ. Affil. Am. Zoo Aquar. Assoc. 2000, 19, 485-493. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Bateson, M.; Martin, P. Measuring Behavior: An Introductory Guide, 4th ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021; pp. 105-106.
- Bagley, K.; Goodwin, T.; Rasmussen, L.; Schulte, B. Male African elephants, Loxodonta africana, can distinguish oestrous status via urinary signals. Anim. Behav. 2006, 71, 439-1445. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Gruber, T.; Friend, T.; Gardner, J.; Packard, J.; Beaver, B.; Bushong, D. Variation in stereotypic behavior related to restraint in circus elephants. Zoo Biol. 2000, 19, 209-221. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Langbauer, W. Elephant communication. Zoo Biol. 2000, 19, 425-445. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Olson, D. (Ed.) Ethogram of elephant behaviors. In Elephant Husbandry Resource Guide; Allen Press: Lawrence, KS, USA, 2004; pp. 103-121.
- Goldenberg, S.; Douglas-Hamilton, I.; Wittemyer, G. Vertical transmission of social roles drives resilience to poaching in elephant networks. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 75-79. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Veasey, J. Concepts in the care and welfare of captive elephants. Int. Zoo Yearb. 2006, 40, 63-79. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Held, S.; Špinka, M. Animal play and animal welfare. Anim. Behav. 2011, 81, 891-899. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Buss, I. Some observations of food habits and behaviour of African Elephants. J. Wildl. Manag. 1961, 25, 131-148. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Vicino, G.; Marcacci, E. Intensity of play behavior as a potential measure of welfare: A novel method for quantifying the integrated intensity of behavior in African elephants. Zoo Biol. 2015, 34, 492-496. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Leighty, K.A.; Soltis, J.; Wesolek, C.M.; Savage, A. Rumble vocalizations mediate interpartner distance in African elephants, Loxodonta africana. Anim. Behav. 2008, 76, 1601-1608. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Poole, J. Elephant Trunk Calls. Swara 1988, 6, 29-31.
- Brown, J.L.; Carlstead, K.; Bray, J.D.; Dickey, D.; Farin, C.; Ange-van Heugten, K. Individual and environmental risk factors associated with fecal glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations in zoo-housed Asian and African elephants. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0217326. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
- Kioko, J.; Taylor, K.; Milne, H.; Hayes, K.; Kiffner, C. Temporal gland secretion in African elephants (Loxodonta africana). Mamm. Biol. 2017, 82, 34-40. [CrossRef] · DOI
- O'Connell-Rodwell, C. Keeping an "ear" to the ground: Seismic communication in elephants. Physiology 2007, 22, 287-294. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Buss, I.; Estes, J. The functional significance of movements and positions of the pinnae of the African elephant, Loxodonta africana. J. Mammal. 1971, 52, 21-27. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Langbauer, W.R.; Payne, K.B.; Charif, R.A.; Rapaport, L.; Osborn, F. African elephants respond to distant playbacks of low frequency conspecific calls. J. Exp. Biol. 1991, 157, 35-46. [CrossRef] · DOI
- McComb, K. Studying vocal communication in elephants. In Studying Elephants; African Wildlife Foundation: Nairobi, Kenya, 1996; pp. 112-119.
- McComb, K.; Reby, D.; Baker, L.; Moss, C.; Sayialel, S. Long-distance communication of acoustic cues to social identity in African elephants. Anim. Behav. 2003, 65, 317-329. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Mason, G.J.; Latham, N. Can't stop, won't stop: Is stereotypy a reliable animal welfare indicator? Anim. Welf. 2004, 13, 57-69.
- Powell, D.; Baskir, E. A matter of time: Comparing observation methods. In Exploring Animal Behavior in Laboratory and Field; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 49-61.
- Margulis, S.; Westhus, E. Evaluation of different observational sampling regimes for use in zoological parks. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 110, 363-376. [CrossRef · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Doyle, C., Rally, H., O’Brien, L., Tennison, M., Marino, L., & Jacobs, B. (2024) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.18161 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Armstrong, S. R., & Johnson, B.
- Affiliations
- Research and Conservation Department, Knowsley Safari, Prescot L34 4AN, UK
- Corresponding author
- Armstrong, Sarah R.
- Venue
- Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-09-16
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 487-501
- ISSN
- 2673-5636 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3200690898
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- Loxodonta africana, captive elephants, animal welfare, behavior change, stress symptoms, vocalizations, play behavior, mother-daughter pairs, social bonds, captive husbandry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review