Illegal deforestation in Mato Grosso: How loopholes in implementing Brazil’s forest code endanger the soy sector
Open accessAbstract
Brazil’s Forest Code (FC) is a landmark law that, despite dating back to the 1930s, has low compliance. Illegal deforestation continues, and millions of hectares that were set to be reforested remain degraded. Although sector agreements such as the Amazon Soy Moratorium (ASM) have been important in the fight against deforestation, the implementation of the FC represents the key long-term strategy to halt deforestation in the soy supply chain. Here, we used datasets of the boundaries of rural properties, deforestation permits, environmental licensing, and land cover in Mato Grosso to quantify illegal deforestation and analyzed compliance with the Forest Code (FC) on soy farms to explore how loopholes in the implementation of the FC allow deforestation to continue unabated. Our analyses show that between August 2009 and July 2019, soy farms in Mato Grosso State, the largest Brazilian soy producer, were responsible for 15% (or 468.1 thousand hectares) of all land cleared in registered properties. Half of this deforestation was illegal. The FC implementation within these properties has been slow: only 11% of registered soy farms have made it to the final stage of the registration process, thus being considered fully compliant. This novel analysis reinforces that accelerating the implementation of the FC could significantly reduce deforestation and advance the restoration of illegally cleared land particularly in the Cerrado, where 50% of the original cover has already been lost, as well as in the Amazon. By achieving full compliance in the soy sector, Brazil’s position in the international market would be strengthened as a supplier of sustainably produced, deforestation-free commodities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The creation of a Rural Environmental Registry (CAR) populated through self-declaration and left inadequately scrutinized means it has been widely used as an institutional device to grab lands, i.e., to claim ownership over smallholder plots or parts of protected areas.
“Furthermore, the creation of a Rural Environmental Registry (Cadastro Ambiental Rural -CAR) populated through self-declaration and left inadequately scrutinized (see Carvalho et al., 2024) means it has been widely used as an institutional device to grab lands, i.e., to claim ownership over smallholder plots or parts of protected areas (Horn, 2024).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Carvalho et al., 2024
Cites
Soares-Filho, B., Rajão, R., Macedo, M., Carneiro, A., Costa, W., Coe, M., Rodrigues, H., & Alencar, A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246663 · Cited by 1,133 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
- Authors
- Carvalho, R., Rausch, L., Gibbs, H. K., Bastos Lima, M. G., Bernasconi, P., Valdiones, A. P., Vasconcelos, A., & Silgueiro, V.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Centro de Vida, Rua Estevão de Mendonça, 1770-Quilombo, Cuiabá 78043-405, MT, Brazil
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnégatan 87D, 115 23 Stockholm, Sweden
- Global Canopy (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Carvalho, Raquel
- ORCID
- Venue
- Land
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-11-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1828
- ISSN
- 2073-445X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4404047718
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Land (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- illegal deforestation, Forest Code, soy supply chain, environmental licensing, land cover change, Cerrado, Mato Grosso, land registration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review