Cited by 75CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringPlant Stress Responses and ToleranceGenetically Modified Organisms Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 275 of the 275 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome Editing and Improvement of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants

Open access

Yadav, Rakesh Kumar, Tripathi, Manoj Kumar, Tiwari, Sushma, Tripathi, Niraj, Asati, Ruchi, Chauhan, Shailja, Tiwari, Prakash Narayan, Payasi, Devendra K.·2023·Life

DOI 10.3390/life13071456PMC PMC10381907

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Genome editing aims to revolutionise plant breeding and could assist in safeguarding the global food supply. The inclusion of a 12-40 bp recognition site makes mega nucleases the first tools utilized for genome editing and first generation gene-editing tools. Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) are the second gene-editing technique, and because they create double-stranded breaks, they are more dependable and effective. ZFNs were the original designed nuclease-based approach of genome editing. The Cys2-His2 zinc finger domain's discovery made this technique possible. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) are utilized to improve genetics, boost biomass production, increase nutrient usage efficiency, and develop disease resistance. Plant genomes can be effectively modified using genome-editing technologies to enhance characteristics without introducing foreign DNA into the genome. Next-generation plant breeding will soon be defined by these exact breeding methods. There is abroad promise that genome-edited crops will be essential in the years to come for improving the sustainability and climate-change resilience of food systems. This method also has great potential for enhancing crops' resistance to various abiotic stressors. In this review paper, we summarize the most recent findings about the mechanism of abiotic stress response in crop plants and the use of the CRISPR/Cas mediated gene-editing systems to improve tolerance to stresses including drought, salinity, cold, heat, and heavy metals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/life13071456

Cites

275 of 275 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Items 201–275 of 275

CRISPR-Cas9: Tool for Qualitative and Quantitative Plant Genome Editing
Noman, A., Aqeel, M. A., & He, S. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01740 · Cited by 97
Exogenous SA Affects Rice Seed Germination under Salt Stress by Regulating Na+/K+ Balance and Endogenous GAs and ABA Homeostasis
Liu, Z., Ma, C., Hou, L., Wu, X., Wang, D., Zhang, L., & Liu, P. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23063293 · Cited by 96
Creating a novel herbicide-tolerance OsALS allele using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing
Wang, F., Xu, Y., Li, W., Chen, Z., Wang, J., Fan, F., Tao, Y., Jiang, Y., Zhu, Q., & Yang, J. (2020) · The Crop Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cj.2020.06.001 · Cited by 94
Genome Editing for Sustainable Crop Improvement and Mitigation of Biotic and Abiotic Stresses
Hamdan, M. F., Karlson, C. K. S., Teoh, E. Y., Lau, S.-E., & Tan, B. C. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11192625 · Cited by 91
Mutations in the tomato gibberellin receptors suppress xylem proliferation and reduce water loss under water-deficit conditions
Illouz‐Eliaz, N., Nissan, I., Nir, I., Ramon, U., Shohat, H., & Weiss, D. W. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa137 · Cited by 90
Homing Endonucleases: From Genetic Anomalies to Programmable Genomic Clippers
Belfort, M., & Bonocora, R. P. (2014) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-968-0_1 · Cited by 87
Developing a novel artificial rice germplasm for dinitroaniline herbicide resistance by base editing of OsTubA2
Liu, L., Kuang, Y., Yan, F., Li, S., Ren, B., Gosavi, G., Spetz, C., Li, X., Wang, X., Zhou, X., et al. (2020) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13430 · Cited by 87
OsPRX2 contributes to stomatal closure and improves potassium deficiency tolerance in rice
Mao, X., Zheng, Y., Xiao, K., Wei, Y., Zhu, Y., Cai, Q., Chen, L., Xie, H., & Zhang, J. (2017) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.11.045 · Cited by 86
Application and future perspective of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in fruit crops
Zhou, J., Li, D., Wang, G., Wang, F., Kunjal, M., Joldersma, D., & Liu, Z. (2019) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.12793 · Cited by 86
Heterotrimeric G protein are involved in the regulation of multiple agronomic traits and stress tolerance in rice
Cui, Y., Jiang, N., Xu, Z., & Xu, Q. (2020) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-020-2289-6 · Cited by 86
Genetically Modified (GM) Crop Use 1996–2020: Environmental Impacts Associated with Pesticide Use Change
Brookes, G. R. (2022) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2022.2118497 · Cited by 83
A novel family of transcription factors conserved in angiosperms is required for ABA signalling
Tian, H., Chen, S., Yang, W., Wang, T., Zheng, K., Wang, Y., Cheng, Y., Zhang, N., Liu, S., Li, D., et al. (2017) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.13058 · Cited by 81
Genome Editing for Crop Improvement – Applications in Clonally Propagated Polyploids With a Focus on Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
Nadakuduti, S. S., Buell, C. R., Voytas, D. F., Starker, C. G., & Douches, D. S. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01607 · Cited by 81
Habitat Temperature and Precipitation of Arabidopsis thaliana Ecotypes Determine the Response of Foliar Vasculature, Photosynthesis, and Transpiration to Growth Temperature
Adams, W. W., Stewart, J. J., Cohu, C. M., Muller, O., & Demmig‐Adams, B. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01026 · Cited by 77
Targeted base editing in rice with CRISPR/ScCas9 system
Wang, M., Xu, Z., Gosavi, G., Ren, B., Cao, Y., Kuang, Y., Zhou, C., Spetz, C., Yan, F., Zhou, X., et al. (2020) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13330 · Cited by 75
Allelic Variants of CRISPR/Cas9 Induced Mutation in an Inositol Trisphosphate 5/6 Kinase Gene Manifest Different Phenotypes in Barley
Vlčko, T., & Ohnoutková, L. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9020195 · Cited by 74
TALEN ‐mediated targeted mutagenesis produces a large variety of heritable mutations in rice
Zhang, H., Gou, F., Zhang, J., Liu, W., Li, Q., Mao, Y., Botella, J. R., & Zhu, J. (2015) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12372 · Cited by 72
Genome editing technologies and their applications in crop improvement
Mishra, R., & Zhao, K. (2018) · Plant Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11816-018-0472-0 · Cited by 72
Breeding and Genomic Approaches towards Development of Fusarium Wilt Resistance in Chickpea
Yadav, R. K., Tripathi, M. K., Tiwari, S., Tripathi, N., Asati, R., Patel, V., Sikarwar, R. S., & Payasi, D. K. (2023) · Life · doi:10.3390/life13040988 · Cited by 71
Self-citation
Targeted Gene Manipulation in Plants Using the CRISPR/Cas Technology
Zhang, D., Li, Z., & Li, J.-F. (2016) · Journal of Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2016.03.001 · Cited by 67
Genome Editing in Agriculture: Technical and Practical Considerations
Jansing, J., Schiermeyer, A., Schillberg, S., Fischer, R., & Bortesi, L. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20122888 · Cited by 66
Plant Response to Cold Stress: Cold Stress Changes Antioxidant Metabolism in Heading Type Kimchi Cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. Pekinensis)
Eom, S. H., Ahn, M.-A., Kim, E., Lee, H. J., Lee, J. H., Wi, S. H., Kim, S. K., Lim, H. B., & Hyun, T. K. (2022) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox11040700 · Cited by 66
High Temperature during Grain Filling Impacts on Leaf Senescence in Waxy Maize
Yang, H., Huang, T., Ding, M., Lu, D., & Lu, W. (2017) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2016.08.0452 · Cited by 60
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technology: A Valuable Tool for Understanding Plant Cell Wall Biosynthesis and Function
Zhang, Y., & Showalter, A. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.589517 · Cited by 60
RNA Interference for Functional Genomics and Improvement of Cotton (Gossypium sp.)
Abdurakhmonov, I. Y., Sobitjonovich, A. M., Ubaydullaeva, K. A., Buriev, Z. T., Shermatov, S. E., Ruziboev, H. S., Shapulatov, U., Saha, S., Ulloa, M., Yu, J. Z., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00202 · Cited by 59
Plant drought tolerance provided through genome editing of the trehalase gene
Núñez-Muñoz, L. A., Vargas-Hernández, B. Y., Hinojosa-Moya, J., Ruíz‐Medrano, R., & Xoconostle‐Cázares, B. (2021) · Plant Signaling & Behavior · doi:10.1080/15592324.2021.1877005 · Cited by 57
Development of Novel Rice Germplasm for Salt-Tolerance at Seedling Stage Using CRISPR-Cas9
Han, X., Chen, Z., Li, P., Xu, H., Liu, K., Zha, W., Li, S., Chen, J., Yang, G., Huang, J., et al. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14052621 · Cited by 57
Efficient CRISPR/Cas9‐based plant genomic fragment deletions by microhomology‐mediated end joining
Tan, J., Zhao, Y., Wang, B., Yu, H., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Luo, W., Zong, W., Li, G., Chen, S., et al. (2020) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13390 · Cited by 56
Abiotic Stress in Plants
Fahad, S., Saud, S., Chen, Y., Wu, C., & Wang, D. (2020) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.91549 · Cited by 53
Single-nucleotide editing for zebra3 and wsl5 phenotypes in rice using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated adenine base editors
Molla, K. A., Shih, J., & Yang, Y. (2020) · aBIOTECH · doi:10.1007/s42994-020-00018-x · Cited by 52
CRISPR-Cas9 based stress tolerance: New hope for abiotic stress tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum)
Razzaq, M. K., Akhter, M., Ahmad, R. M., Cheema, K. L., Hina, A., Karikari, B., Raza, G., Xing, G., Gai, J., & Khurshid, M. (2022) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-022-07391-4 · Cited by 50
Genomic Selection and Genome-Wide Association Studies for Grain Protein Content Stability in a Nested Association Mapping Population of Wheat
Sandhu, K. S., Mihalyov, P. D., Lewien, M. J., Pumphrey, M., & Carter, A. H. (2021) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11122528 · Cited by 50
Caution required for handling genome editing technology
Araki, M., Nojima, K., & Ishii, T. (2014) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.03.005 · Cited by 49
Selection of the high efficient sgRNA for CRISPR-Cas9 to edit herbicide related genes, PDS, ALS, and EPSPS in tomato
Yang, S. H., Kim, E., Park, H., & Koo, Y. (2022) · Applied Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1186/s13765-022-00679-w · Cited by 49
Enhanced Growth Performance and Salinity Tolerance in Transgenic Switchgrass via Overexpressing Vacuolar Na+ (K+)/H+ Antiporter Gene (PvNHX1)
Huang, Y., Guan, C., Liu, Y., Chen, B., Yuan, S., Cui, X., Zhang, Y., & Yang, F. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00458 · Cited by 47
Targeted gene disruption coupled with metabolic screen approach to uncover the LEAFY COTYLEDON1-LIKE4 (L1L4) function in tomato fruit metabolism
Gago, C., Drosou, V., Paschalidis, K. A., Guerreiro, A. C., Miguel, G., Antunes, M. D. C., & Hilioti, Z. (2017) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-017-2137-9 · Cited by 47
Genome Editing: A Promising Approach for Achieving Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants
Kaur, N., Sharma, S., Hasanuzzaman, M., & Pati, P. K. (2022) · International Journal of Genomics · doi:10.1155/2022/5547231 · Cited by 47
Potential impact of genome editing in world agriculture
Martínez-Fortún, J., Phillips, D. W., & Jones, H. D. (2017) · Emerging Topics in Life Sciences · doi:10.1042/etls20170010 · Cited by 46
Genome editing for targeted improvement of plants
Khandagale, K. S., & Nadaf, A. B. (2016) · Plant Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11816-016-0417-4 · Cited by 45
Multi-Trait Multi-Environment Genomic Prediction for End-Use Quality Traits in Winter Wheat
Sandhu, K. S., Patil, S. S., Aoun, M., & Carter, A. H. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.831020 · Cited by 45
Optimizing sowing window, cultivar choice, and plant density to boost maize yield under RCP8.5 climate scenario of CMIP5
Ali, M. G. M., Ahmed, M., Ibrahim, M. M., Baroudy, A. A. E., Ali, E. F., Shokr, M. S., Aldosari, A. A., Majrashi, A., & Kheir, A. M. S. (2022) · International Journal of Biometeorology · doi:10.1007/s00484-022-02253-x · Cited by 44
Advantages and Disadvantages of Cytidine Deamination
Cascalho, M. (2004) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.172.11.6513 · Cited by 42
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutation of 5-oxoprolinase gene confers resistance to sulfonamide compounds in Arabidopsis
Baeg, G.-J., Kim, S.-H., Choi, D., Tripathi, S., Han, Y., & Kim, J. (2021) · Plant Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11816-021-00718-w · Cited by 42
Molecular Breeding to Overcome Biotic Stresses in Soybean: Update
Tripathi, N., Tripathi, M. K., Tiwari, S., & Payasi, D. K. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11151967 · Cited by 41
Self-citation
Targeted mutagenesis of the SUMO protease, Overly Tolerant to Salt1 in rice through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing reveals a major role of this SUMO protease in salt tolerancePreprint
Zhang, C., Srivastava, A. K., & Sadanandom, A. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/555706 · Cited by 39
Applications of Alternative Nucleases in the Age of CRISPR/Cas9
Guha, T. K., & Edgell, D. R. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms18122565 · Cited by 37
Leaf architectural, vascular and photosynthetic acclimation to temperature in two biennials
Muller, O., Stewart, J. J., Cohu, C. M., Polutchko, S. K., Demmig‐Adams, B., & Adams, W. W. (2014) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/ppl.12226 · Cited by 34
Suaeda vermiculata Forssk. ex J.F. Gmel.: Structural Characteristics and Adaptations to Salinity and Drought: A Review
Ghazali, G. E. B. E. (2020) · International Journal of Sciences · doi:10.18483/ijsci.2268 · Cited by 33
Modelling Climate Uncertainty and Adaptations for Soybean-Based Cropping System
Ejaz, M., Abbas, G., Fatima, Z., Iqbal, P., Raza, M. A., Kheir, A. M. S., Ahmed, M., Kakar, K. M., & Ahmad, S. (2022) · International Journal of Plant Production · doi:10.1007/s42106-022-00190-8 · Cited by 32
Targeted Mutagenesis in Arabidopsis Using Zinc-Finger Nucleases
Zhang, F., & Voytas, D. F. (2010) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61737-957-4_9 · Cited by 31
Targeted Mutagenesis for Functional Analysis of Gene Duplication in Legumes
Curtin, S. J., Anderson, J., Starker, C. G., Baltes, N. J., Mani, D., Voytas, D. F., & Stupar, R. M. (2013) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-613-9_3 · Cited by 29
GhHB12 negatively regulates abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis and cotton
He, X., Luo, X., Wang, T., Liu, S., Zhang, X., & Zhu, L. (2020) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104087 · Cited by 29
Stress Physiology of Woody Plants
Dai, W. (2019) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780429190476 · Cited by 28
Genome editing for crop improvement: A perspective from India
Bhattacharya, A., Parkhi, V., & Char, B. R. (2021) · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant · doi:10.1007/s11627-021-10184-2 · Cited by 28
Gene editing: an instrument for practical application of gene biology to plant breeding
Tan, Y., Du, H., Wu, X., Liu, Y., Jiang, M., Song, S., Wu, L., & Shu, Q. (2020) · Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B · doi:10.1631/jzus.b1900633 · Cited by 26
Using CRISPR/Cas to enhance gene expression for crop trait improvement by editing miRNA targets
Ferreira, S. S., & Reis, R. S. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erad003 · Cited by 25
Plant Biotechnology Applications of Zinc Finger Technology
Novak, S. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8778-8_20 · Cited by 23
Abiotic Stress-Induced Molecular and Physiological Changes and Adaptive Mechanisms in Plants
Mathivanan, S. (2021) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.93367 · Cited by 23
An intragenic approach to confer glyphosate resistance in chile (Capsicum annuum) by introducing an in vitro mutagenized chile EPSPS gene encoding for a glyphosate resistant EPSPS protein
Ortega, J. L., Rajapakse, W., Bagga, S., Apodaca, K., Lucero, Y., & Sengupta‐Gopalan, C. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194666 · Cited by 21
Demonstration of CRISPR- cas 9-mediated pds gene editing in a tomato hybrid parental line
Parkhi, V., Bhattacharya, A., Choudhary, S., Pathak, R., Gawade, V., Palan, B., Alamalakala, L., Mikkilineni, V., & Char, B. R. (2017) · Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The) · doi:10.5958/0975-6906.2018.00016.0 · Cited by 18
Genome-Wide Association Studies and Genomic Selection for Grain Protein Content Stability in a Nested Association Mapping Population of Spring WheatPreprint
Sandhu, K. S., Mihalyov, P. D., Lewien, M. J., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.04.15.440064 · Cited by 15
IDENTIFICATION OF INDIAN SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAX [L.] MERR.) GENOTYPES FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE AND GENETIC DIVERSITY ANALYSIS USING SSR MARKERS
MARKERS, I. O. I. S. (. M. [. ]. M. ). G. F. D. T. A. G. D. A. U. S. (2023) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7697640 · Cited by 15
Genome Editing for Sustainable Crop Improvement and Mitigation of Biotic and Abiotic StressesPreprint
Hamdan, M. F., Karlson, C. K. S., Teoh, E. Y., et al. (2022) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202207.0404.v1 · Cited by 14
Application of genome‐editing technology in crop improvement
Ni, Z., Han, Q., He, Y., & Huang, S. (2017) · Cereal Chemistry · doi:10.1094/cchem-05-17-0101-fi · Cited by 13
The Exploitation of Genetic Variability and Trait Association Analysis for Diverse Quantitative Traits in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Sharma, S., Tripathi, M. K., Tiwari, S., Solanki, R. S., Chauhan, S., Tripathi, N., Dwivedi, N., & Kandalkar, V. S. (2023) · Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology · doi:10.9734/cjast/2023/v42i84087 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Polymorphism analysis in advanced mutant population of oat (Avena sativa L.) using ISSR markers
Sharma, P., Tiwari, S., Tripathi, N., & Mehta, A. K. (2016) · Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants · doi:10.1007/s12298-015-0333-z · Cited by 12
Self-citation
Morpho-Physiological and Molecular Characterization of Maize (Zea Mays L.) Genotypes for Drought Tolerance
Yadav, P. K., Singh, A. K., Tripathi, M. K., Tiwari, S., Yadav, S. K., & Tripathi, N. (2022) · European journal of applied sciences · doi:10.14738/aivp.106.13340 · Cited by 12
Self-citation
Characterization of Soybean Genotypes on the Basis of Yield Attributing Traits and SSR Molecular Markers
Mishra, N., Tripathi, M. K., Tiwari, S., Tripathi, N., Gupta, N., Sharma, A., Solanki, R. S., & Tiwari, S. (2022) · Book Publisher International (a part of SCIENCEDOMAIN International) · doi:10.9734/bpi/ist/v3/2471c · Cited by 11
Self-citation
CHARACTERIZATION OF PEARL MILLET [PENNISETUM GLAUCUM (L.) R BR.] GENOTYPES AGAINST BLAST DISEASE EMPLOYING DISEASE SCORING AND GENE SPECIFIC SSR MARKERS
MARKERS, C. O. P. M. [. G. (. ). R. B. ]. G. A. B. D. E. D. S. A. G. S. S. (2023) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7697622 · Cited by 9
Biotechnological Interventions to Combat against Charcoal Rot and Rhizoctonia Root Rot Diseases of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]
Upadhyay, S., Singh, A. K., Tripathi, M. K., Tiwari, S., & Tripathi, N. (2022) · Book Publisher International (a part of SCIENCEDOMAIN International) · doi:10.9734/bpi/ctas/v6/3250e · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Are CRISPR/Cas genome editing techniques the future of plant breeding?
Hazman, M. Y. (2022) · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.21608/ejar.2022.163324.1283 · Cited by 8
Knockouts of Drought Sensitive Genes Improve Rice Grain Yield under both Drought and Well-Watered Field Conditions
Lü, G., ChangGui, W., Wang, G., Mao, G., Habben, J. E., Chen, G., Liu, M., Shi, Y., Wang, W., Wang, X., et al. (2020) · Advances in Crop Science and Technology · Cited by 7
Identification of Low and High Erucic Acid Containing Genotype(S) in Indian Mustard Employing Molecular Markers
Shyam, C., Tripathi, M. K., Tiwari, S., Tripathi, N., & Ahuja, A. (2022) · Book Publisher International (a part of SCIENCEDOMAIN International) · doi:10.9734/bpi/rppsr/v5/15384d · Cited by 7
Self-citation
Gene editing: A potential tool to enhance field crop production
Imran, M., Butt, M. A., Hannan, A., Manzoor, A., & Qaisar, U. (2020) · International Journal of Biotech Trends and Technology · doi:10.14445/22490183/ijbtt-v10i1p612 · Cited by 4
Status and Scenario of Genome Editing Device CRISPR-Cas9 in Crop Advancement
Rathore, M. S., Tiwari, S., Tripthi, N., Tripathi, M. K., & Tiwari, S. (2021) · Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology · doi:10.9734/cjast/2021/v40i4831639 · Cited by 3
Self-citation

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

Curtin, S.J., Anderson, J.E., Starker, C.G., Baltes, N.J., Mani, D., Voytas, D.F., and Stupar, R.M. (2013). Legume Genomics, Humana Press.
Prajapat, R.K., Mathur, M., Upadhyay, T.K., Lal, D., Maloo, S., and Sharma, D. (2021). Crop Improvement, CRC Press.
Novak, S. (2019). Transgenic Plants, Humana Press.
Ningwal, 2023, Assessment of Genetic Variability, Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis for Yield and Its Attributing Traits in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) The Pharma, Innov. J., 12, 4851
Yadav, 2023, Evaluation of High Oleic Acid Content in a Set of 96 Genotypes of Arachis hypogaea L., Scientist, 2, 132
Maleki, 2013, Physiological Performance of Soybean Cultivars Under Drought Stress. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol, Life Sci., 2, 38
Shahid, S.A., Zaman, M., and Heng, L. (2018). Guideline for Salinity Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Using Nuclear and Related Techniques, Springer.
Ghazali, 2020, SuaedavermiculataForssk. Ex JF Gmel: Structural Characteristics and Adaptations to Salinity and Drought: A Review, Int. J. Sci., 9, 28
Aydinalp, 2009, The Effects of Heavy Metals on Seed Germination and Plant Growth on Alfalfa Plant (Medicago sativa), Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 15, 347
Hakeem, K.R., Sabir, M., Ozturk, M., and Mermut, A.R. (2015). Soil Remediation and Plants Prospects and Challenges, Academic Press.
Shahid, M., Khalid, S., Abbas, G., Shahid, N., Nadeem, M., Sabir, M., Aslam, M., and Dumat, C. (2015). Crop Production and Global Environmental Issues, Springer.
Riaz, 2007, Yield and Yield Components of Maize as Affected by Various Weed Control Methods Under Rain-Fed Conditions of Pakistan, Int. J. Agric. Biol., 9, 152

Sorted by citations

Enhancing climate change resilience in agricultural crops
Benitez‐Alfonso, Y., Soanes, B. K., Zimba, S., Sinanaj, B., German, L., Sharma, V. K., Bohra, A., Kolesnikova, A., Dunn, J. A., Martín, A. C., et al. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.10.028 · Cited by 235
Recent advances of CRISPR-based genome editing for enhancing staple crops
Chen, F., Chen, L., Zhao, Y., Xu, J., Feng, L., He, N., Guo, M., Zhao, J., Chen, Z., Chen, H., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1478398 · Cited by 184
Antioxidant Defense Systems in Plants: Mechanisms, Regulation, and Biotechnological Strategies for Enhanced Oxidative Stress Tolerance
Cannea, F. B., & Padiglia, A. (2025) · Life · doi:10.3390/life15081293 · Cited by 118
A comprehensive review on rice responses and tolerance to salt stress
Sackey, O. K., Feng, N., Mohammed, Y. Z., Dzou, C. F., Zheng, D., Zhao, L., & Shen, X. (2025) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1561280 · Cited by 107
Phytoremediation: Harnessing plant power and innovative technologies for effective soil remediation
Oubohssaine, M., & Dahmani, I. (2024) · Plant Stress · doi:10.1016/j.stress.2024.100578 · Cited by 78

See all 75

Authors: Yadav, R. K., Tripathi, M. K., Tiwari, S., Tripathi, N., Asati, R., Chauhan, S., Tiwari, P. N., & Payasi, D. K.
Affiliations: Department of Genetics & Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior 474002, India
Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (IN)
Department of Plant Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior 474002, India
Regional Agricultural Research Station, Sagar 470001, India
Corresponding author: Tripathi, Manoj Kumar
Tripathi, Niraj
ORCID: Yadav, Rakesh Kumar
Tripathi, Manoj Kumar
Tiwari, Sushma
Tripathi, Niraj
Tiwari, Prakash Narayan
Payasi, Devendra K.
Venue: Life
Publisher: MDPI AG
Published: 2023-06-27
Volume: 13
Issue: 7
Pages: 1456
ISSN: 2075-1729 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.3390/life13071456
PMC: PMC10381907
OpenAlex: W4382402562
Cited by: 75
References: 272
Citations by year: 2026: 23 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5
FWCI: 1.98
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: gold
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Locations: Life (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics: Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords: genome editing, abiotic stress tolerance, CRISPR-Cas, zinc finger nucleases, meganucleases, drought tolerance, salt tolerance, cold tolerance, heat tolerance, heavy metal tolerance, abiotic stress response, crop improvement, plant breeding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Genome Editing and Improvement of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks