CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 67

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeted Gene Manipulation in Plants Using the CRISPR/Cas Technology

Zhang, Dandan, Li, Zhenxiang, Li, Jian-Feng·2016·Journal of Genetics and Genomics
DOI 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.03.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas technology is emerging as a revolutionary genome editing tool in diverse organisms including plants, and has quickly evolved into a suite of versatile tools for sequence-specific gene manipulations beyond genome editing. Here, we review the most recent applications of the CRISPR/Cas toolkit in plants and also discuss key factors for improving CRISPR/Cas performance and strategies for reducing the off-target effects. Novel technical breakthroughs in mammalian research regarding the CRISPR/Cas toolkit will also be incorporated into this review in hope to stimulate prospective users from the plant research community to fully explore the potential of these technologies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.03.001

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 102

  1. Ali, 2015, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated viral interference in plants, Genome Biol., 16, 238, 10.1186/s13059-015-0799-6 · DOI
  2. Ali, 2015, Efficient virus-mediated genome editing in plants using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, Mol. Plant, 8, 1288, 10.1016/j.molp.2015.02.011 · DOI
  3. Bae, 2014, Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases, Bioinformatics, 30, 1473, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu048 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Baltes, 2014, DNA replicons for plant genome engineering, Plant Cell, 26, 151, 10.1105/tpc.113.119792 · DOI
  5. Baltes, 2015, Conferring resistance to geminiviruses with the CRISPR-Cas prokaryotic immune system, Nat. Plants, 1, 15145, 10.1038/nplants.2015.145 · DOI
  6. Belhaj, 2015, Editing plant genomes with CRISPR/Cas9, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 32, 76, 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.007 · DOI
  7. Brooks, 2014, Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated 9 system, Plant Physiol., 166, 1292, 10.1104/pp.114.247577 · DOI
  8. Butler, 2015, Generation and inheritance of targeted mutations in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) using the CRISPR/Cas system, PLoS One, 10, e0144591, 10.1371/journal.pone.0144591 · DOI
  9. Cai, 2015, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in soybean hairy roots, PLoS One, 10, e0136064, 10.1371/journal.pone.0136064 · DOI
  10. Cermak, 2015, High-frequency, precise modification of the tomato genome, Genome Biol., 16, 232, 10.1186/s13059-015-0796-9 · DOI
  11. Chari, 2015, Unraveling CRISPR-Cas9 genome engineering parameters via a library-on-library approach, Nat. Methods, 12, 823, 10.1038/nmeth.3473 · DOI
  12. Chen, 2013, Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system, Cell, 155, 1479, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.001 · DOI
  13. Cong, 2013, Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems, Science, 339, 819, 10.1126/science.1231143 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dang, 2015, Optimizing sgRNA structure to improve CRISPR-Cas9 knockout efficiency, Genome Biol., 16, 280, 10.1186/s13059-015-0846-3 · DOI
  15. Doench, 2014, Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation, Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 1262, 10.1038/nbt.3026 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Doudna, 2014, The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9, Science, 346, 1258096, 10.1126/science.1258096 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Du, 2016, Efficient targeted mutagenesis in soybean by TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9, J. Biotechnol., 217, 90, 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.11.005 · DOI
  18. Duan, 2016, Identification of a regulatory element responsible for salt induction of rice OsRAV2 through ex situ and in situ promoter analysis, Plant Mol. Biol., 90, 49, 10.1007/s11103-015-0393-z · DOI
  19. Endo, 2015, Multigene knockout utilizing off-target mutations of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in rice, Plant Cell Physiol., 56, 41, 10.1093/pcp/pcu154 · DOI
  20. Endo, 2016, Bi-allelic gene targeting in rice, Plant Physiol., 170, 667, 10.1104/pp.15.01663 · DOI
  21. Esvelt, 2013, Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing, Nat. Methods, 10, 1116, 10.1038/nmeth.2681 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Fan, 2015, Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Populus in the first generation, Sci. Rep., 5, 12217, 10.1038/srep12217 · DOI
  23. Fauser, 2014, Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana, Plant J., 79, 348, 10.1111/tpj.12554 · DOI
  24. Feng, 2014, Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 4632, 10.1073/pnas.1400822111 · DOI
  25. Feng, 2013, Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system, Cell Res., 23, 1229, 10.1038/cr.2013.114 · DOI
  26. Gagnon, 2014, Efficient mutagenesis by Cas9 protein-mediated oligonucleotide insertion and large-scale assessment of single-guide RNAs, PLoS One, 9, e98186, 10.1371/journal.pone.0098186 · DOI
  27. Gaj, 2013, ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering, Trends Biotechnol., 31, 397, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Gao, 2015, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotiana tabacum, Plant Mol. Biol., 87, 99, 10.1007/s11103-014-0263-0 · DOI
  29. Gao, 2015, Auxin binding protein 1 (ABP1) is not required for either auxin signaling or Arabidopsis development, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 2275, 10.1073/pnas.1500365112 · DOI
  30. Hilton, 2015, Epigenome editing by a CRISPR-Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers, Nat. Biotechnol., 33, 510, 10.1038/nbt.3199 · DOI
  31. Hsu, 2013, DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases, Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 827, 10.1038/nbt.2647 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Hyun, 2015, Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana using dividing tissue-targeted RGEN of the CRISPR/Cas system to generate heritable null alleles, Planta, 241, 271, 10.1007/s00425-014-2180-5 · DOI
  33. Ito, 2015, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the RIN locus that regulates tomato fruit ripening, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 467, 76, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.117 · DOI
  34. Jacobs, 2015, Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9, BMC Biotechnol., 15, 16, 10.1186/s12896-015-0131-2 · DOI
  35. Ji, 2015, Establishing a CRISPR-Cas-like immune system conferring DNA virus resistance in plants, Nat. Plants, 1, 15144, 10.1038/nplants.2015.144 · DOI
  36. Jia, 2014, Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA, PLoS One, 9, e93806, 10.1371/journal.pone.0093806 · DOI
  37. Jiang, 2014, Successful transient expression of Cas9 and single guide RNA genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Eukaryot. Cell, 13, 1465, 10.1128/EC.00213-14 · DOI
  38. Jiang, 2014, Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and inheritance of modified genes in the T2 and T3 generations, PLoS One, 9, e99225, 10.1371/journal.pone.0099225 · DOI
  39. Jiang, 2013, Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, e188, 10.1093/nar/gkt780 · DOI
  40. Jinek, 2012, A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity, Science, 337, 816, 10.1126/science.1225829 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Johnson, 2015, Comparative assessments of CRISPR-Cas nucleases' cleavage efficiency in planta, Plant Mol. Biol., 87, 143, 10.1007/s11103-014-0266-x · DOI
  42. Karvelis, 2015, Rapid characterization of CRISPR-Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif sequence elements, Genome Biol., 16, 253, 10.1186/s13059-015-0818-7 · DOI
  43. Kearns, 2015, Functional annotation of native enhancers with a Cas9-histone demethylase fusion, Nat. Methods, 12, 401, 10.1038/nmeth.3325 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Lawrenson, 2015, Induction of targeted, heritable mutations in barley and Brassica oleracea using RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease, Genome Biol., 16, 258, 10.1186/s13059-015-0826-7 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Lei, 2014, CRISPR-P: a web tool for synthetic single-guide RNA design of CRISPR-system in plants, Mol. Plant, 7, 1494, 10.1093/mp/ssu044 · DOI
  46. Li, 2013, Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9, Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 688, 10.1038/nbt.2654 · DOI
  47. Li, 2015, Cas9-guide RNA directed genome editing in soybean, Plant Physiol., 169, 960, 10.1104/pp.15.00783 · DOI
  48. Liang, 2014, Targeted mutagenesis in Zea mays using TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas system, J. Genet. Genomics, 41, 63, 10.1016/j.jgg.2013.12.001 · DOI
  49. Lowder, 2015, A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation, Plant Physiol., 169, 971, 10.1104/pp.15.00636 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Ma, 2015, A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants, Mol. Plant, 8, 1274, 10.1016/j.molp.2015.04.007 · DOI
  51. Ma, 2015, Multicolor CRISPR labeling of chromosomal loci in human cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 3002, 10.1073/pnas.1420024112 · DOI
  52. Mali, 2013, RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9, Science, 339, 823, 10.1126/science.1232033 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Malina, 2015, PAM multiplicity marks genomic target sites as inhibitory to CRISPR-Cas9 editing, Nat. Commun., 6, 10124, 10.1038/ncomms10124 · DOI
  54. Mao, 2013, Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants, Mol. Plant, 6, 2008, 10.1093/mp/sst121 · DOI
  55. Mao, 2016, Development of germ-line-specific CRISPR-Cas9 systems to improve the production of heritable gene modifications in Arabidopsis, Plant Biotechnol. J., 14, 519, 10.1111/pbi.12468 · DOI
  56. Martin-Ortigosa, 2014, Mesoporous silica nanoparticle-mediated intracellular cre protein delivery for maize genome editing via loxP site excision, Plant Physiol., 164, 537, 10.1104/pp.113.233650 · DOI
  57. Miao, 2013, Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system, Cell Res., 23, 1233, 10.1038/cr.2013.123 · DOI
  58. Michno, 2015, CRISPR/Cas mutagenesis of soybean and Medicago truncatula using a new web-tool and a modified Cas9 enzyme, GM Crops Food., 6, 243, 10.1080/21645698.2015.1106063 · DOI
  59. Mikami, 2015, Comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 expression constructs for efficient targeted mutagenesis in rice, Plant Mol. Biol., 88, 561, 10.1007/s11103-015-0342-x · DOI
  60. Mikami, 2015, Parameters affecting frequency of CRISPR/Cas9 mediated targeted mutagenesis in rice, Plant Cell Rep., 34, 1807, 10.1007/s00299-015-1826-5 · DOI
  61. Nekrasov, 2013, Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease, Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 691, 10.1038/nbt.2655 · DOI
  62. Ning, 2015, Two novel NAC transcription factors regulate gene expression and flowering time by associating with the histone demethylase JMJ14, Nucleic. Acids Res., 43, 1469, 10.1093/nar/gku1382 · DOI
  63. O'Connell, 2014, Programmable RNA recognition and cleavage by CRISPR/Cas9, Nature, 516, 263, 10.1038/nature13769 · DOI
  64. Perez-Pinera, 2013, RNA-guided gene activation by CRISPR-Cas9-based transcription factors, Nat. Methods, 10, 973, 10.1038/nmeth.2600 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Piatek, 2014, RNA-guided transcriptional regulation in planta via synthetic dCas9-based transcription factors, Plant Biotechnol. J., 13, 578, 10.1111/pbi.12284 · DOI
  66. Puchta, 2014, Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: prospects for a bright future, Plant J., 78, 727, 10.1111/tpj.12338 · DOI
  67. Ran, 2013, Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity, Cell, 154, 1380, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Ron, 2014, Hairy root transformation using Agrobacterium rhizogenes as a tool for exploring cell type-specific gene expression and function using a tomato as a model, Plant Physiol., 166, 455, 10.1104/pp.114.239392 · DOI
  69. Schaeffer, 2015, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing and gene replacement in plants: transitioning from lab to field, Plant Sci., 240, 130, 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.09.011 · DOI
  70. Schiml, 2014, The CRISPR/Cas system can be used as nuclease for in planta gene targeting and as paired nickases for directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis resulting in heritable progeny, Plant J., 80, 1139, 10.1111/tpj.12704 · DOI
  71. Shan, 2013, Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system, Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 686, 10.1038/nbt.2650 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Steinert, 2015, Highly efficient heritable plant genome engineering using Cas9 orthologues from Streptococcus thermophiles and Staphylococcus aureus, Plant J., 84, 1295, 10.1111/tpj.13078 · DOI
  73. Sternberg, 2014, DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9, Nature, 507, 62, 10.1038/nature13011 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Sugano, 2014, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L, Plant Cell Physiol., 55, 475, 10.1093/pcp/pcu014 · DOI
  75. Sun, 2015, Targeted mutagenesis in soybean using the CRISPR-Cas9 system, Sci. Rep., 5, 10342, 10.1038/srep10342 · DOI
  76. Svitashev, 2015, Targeted mutagenesis, precise genome editing, and site-specific gene insertion in maize using Cas9 and guide RNA, Plant Physiol., 169, 931, 10.1104/pp.15.00793 · DOI
  77. Tanenbaum, 2014, A protein-tagging system for signal amplification in gene expression and fluorescence imaging, Cell, 159, 635, 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.039 · DOI
  78. Tsai, 2014, Dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided FokI nucleases for highly specific genome editing, Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 569, 10.1038/nbt.2908 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Upadhyay, 2013, RNA-guided genome editing for targeted gene mutations in wheat, G3, 3, 2233, 10.1534/g3.113.008847 · DOI
  80. Voytas, 2013, Plant genome engineering with sequence-specific nucleases, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 64, 327, 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105552 · DOI
  81. Wang, 2014, Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew, Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 947, 10.1038/nbt.2969 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Wang, 2014, Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system, Science, 343, 80, 10.1126/science.1246981 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Wang, 2015, Egg cell-specific promoter-controlled CRISPR/Cas9 efficiently generates homozygous mutants for multiple target genes in Arabidopsis in a single generation, Genome Biol., 16, 144, 10.1186/s13059-015-0715-0 · DOI
  84. Wang, 2015, Efficient targeted mutagenesis in potato by the CRISPR/Cas9 system, Plant Cell Rep., 34, 1473, 10.1007/s00299-015-1816-7 · DOI
  85. Weeks, 2016, Use of designer nucleases for targeted gene and genome editing in plants, Plant Biotechnol. J., 14, 483, 10.1111/pbi.12448 · DOI
  86. Woo, 2015, DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins, Nat. Biotechnol., 33, 1162, 10.1038/nbt.3389 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Xie, 2015, Boosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA-processing system, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 3570, 10.1073/pnas.1420294112 · DOI
  88. Xie, 2013, RNA-guided genome editing in plants using a CRISPR-Cas system, Mol. Plant, 6, 1975, 10.1093/mp/sst119 · DOI
  89. Xie, 2014, Genome-wide prediction of highly specific guide RNA spacers for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in model plants and major crops, Mol. Plant, 7, 923, 10.1093/mp/ssu009 · DOI
  90. Xing, 2014, A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants, BMC Plant Biol., 14, 327, 10.1186/s12870-014-0327-y · DOI · Paper page
  91. Xu, 2014, Gene targeting using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated CRISPR-Cas system in rice, Rice, 7, 5, 10.1186/s12284-014-0005-6 · DOI
  92. Xu, 2015, Generation of inheritable and “transgene clean” targeted genome-modified rice in later generations using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, Sci. Rep., 5, 11491, 10.1038/srep11491 · DOI
  93. Yan, 2015, High efficiency genome editing in Arabidopsis using YAO promoter-driven CRISPR/Cas9 system, Mol. Plant, 8, 1820, 10.1016/j.molp.2015.10.004 · DOI
  94. Yan, 2015, CRISPR Primer Designer: Design primers for knockout and chromosome imaging CRISPR-Cas system, J. Integr. Plant Biol., 57, 613, 10.1111/jipb.12295 · DOI
  95. Yin, 2015, A geminivirus-based guide RNA delivery system for CRISPR/Cas9 mediated plant genome editing, Sci. Rep., 5, 14926, 10.1038/srep14926 · DOI
  96. Zetsche, 2015, Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system, Cell, 163, 759, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038 · DOI · Paper page
  97. Zhang, 2014, The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation, Plant Biotechnol. J., 12, 797, 10.1111/pbi.12200 · DOI
  98. Zhang, 2015, A multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 platform for fast and efficient editing of multiple genes in Arabidopsis, Plant Cell Rep.
  99. Zhang, 2015, Genome editing: new antiviral weapon for plants, Nat. Plants, 1, 15146, 10.1038/nplants.2015.146 · DOI
  100. Zhou, 2014, Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in rice, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 10903, 10.1093/nar/gku806 · DOI
  101. Zhou, 2015, Gene targeting by the TAL effector PthXo2 reveals cryptic resistance gene for bacterial blight of rice, Plant J., 82, 632, 10.1111/tpj.12838 · DOI
  102. Zhou, 2015, Exploiting SNPs for biallelic CRISPR mutations in the outcrossing woody perennial Populus reveals 4-coumarate: CoA ligase specificity and redundancy, New Phytol., 208, 298, 10.1111/nph.13470 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 67

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, D., Li, Z., & Li, J.-F.
Venue
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
251-262
ISSN
1673-8527
DOI
10.1016/j.jgg.2016.03.001
Cited by
67
References
10
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31522006, 31570276)
  • Sun Yat-sen University
  • China's Thousand Young Talents Program

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review