Cited by 162Supply Chain Resilience and Risk ManagementImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietySupply Chain and Inventory Management

Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience Through Artificial Intelligence: Developing a Comprehensive Conceptual Framework for AI Implementation and Supply Chain Optimization

Open access
Riad, Meriem, Naimi, Mohamed, Okar, Chafik·2024·Logistics

Abstract

Background: Amid growing global uncertainty and increasingly complex disruptions, the ability of supply chains to rapidly adapt and recover is critical. The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into supply chain management represents a transformative strategy for enhancing resilience. By harnessing advanced AI technologies, such as machine learning, predictive analytics, and real-time data processing, organizations can more effectively anticipate, respond to, and recover from disruptions.AI improves demand forecasting accuracy, optimizes inventory management, and increases real-time visibility across the supply chain, reducing the risks of stockouts and surplus inventory. Furthermore, I-driven automation and robotics enhance operational efficiency by minimizing human error and streamlining processes. Methodology/Approach: This paper proposes a conceptual framework for strengthening supply chain resilience through AI integration. The framework leverages AI technologies to improve key aspects of supply chain resilience, including risk management, operational efficiency, and real-time visibility. Result/Conclusions: Additionally, it underscores the importance of collaborative relationships with supply chain partners, enabled by AI-powered data-sharing and communication tools that foster trust and coordination within the network. Originality/Value: This comprehensive framework offers a strategic approach to integrating AI into supply chain management, highlighting its potential to significantly enhance resilience, operational efficiency, and sustainability, thereby empowering organizations to navigate the complexities of modern supply chains more effectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/logistics8040111

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riad, M., Naimi, M., & Okar, C.
Affiliations
  • Université Hassan 1er (MA)
  • Abdelmalek Essaâdi University (MA)
Corresponding author
Riad, Meriem
Venue
Logistics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-11-06
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
111
ISSN
2305-6290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404110879
Cited by
146
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 4
FWCI
49.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Logistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Keywords
supply chain resilience, artificial intelligence, supply chain management, AI implementation, supply chain optimization, demand forecasting, inventory management, real-time visibility, supply chain risk management, operational efficiency, automation and robotics, data sharing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review