The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effect of Accelerator Dosage on Fresh Concrete Properties and on Interlayer Strength in Shotcrete 3D Printing
Open accessAbstract
Recently, the progress in 3D concrete printing has developed enormously. However, for the techniques available, there is still a severe lack of knowledge of the functional interaction of processing technology, concrete rheology and admixture usage. For shotcrete 3D printing technology, we present the effect of accelerator dosages (0%, 2%, 4% and 6%) on fresh concrete properties and on interlayer strength. Therefore, early yield stress development up to 90 min is measured with penetration resistance measurements. Deformation of layers under loading is investigated with digital image correlation and a mechanical testing machine. One point in time (10 min after deposition) is examined to quantify vertical buildability of elements depending on the accelerator dosage. Four different interlayer times (0, 2, 5 and 30 min), which occur for the production of small and large elements as well as due to delay during production, are investigated mechanically as well as quantitatively with computed tomography regarding the formation of cold joints. With increased accelerator dosage, an instantaneous increase in early age yield stress and yield stress evolution was observed. An increase in interlayer time leads to a reduced strength. This is mainly attributed to the observed reduced mechanical interlocking effect of the strands. Finally, a model to describe interlayer quality is presented. In the end, advantages as well as limitations of the findings are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., & Salet, T. (2016) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867 · Cited by 1,257
Mega-scale fabrication by Contour Crafting
Khoshnevis, B., Hwang, D., Yao, K. T., & Yeh, Z. (2006) · International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering · doi:10.1504/ijise.2006.009791 · Cited by 378
Khoshnevis, B., & Dutton, R. (1998) · Materials Technology · doi:10.1080/10667857.1998.11752766 · Cited by 207
Cited by
Extrusion-based concrete 3D printing from a material perspective: A state-of-the-art review
Mohan, M. K., Rahul, A. V., De Schutter, G., & Van Tittelboom, K. (2021) · Cement and Concrete Composites · doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103855 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Dressler, I., Freund, N., & Lowke, D.
- Venue
- Materials
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-01-14
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 374
- ISSN
- 1996-1944 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2998953382
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Accelerator Dosage on Fresh Concrete Properties and on Interlayer Strength in Shotcrete 3D Printing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ma13020374
- The paper
- Dressler, I., Freund, N., & Lowke, D. (2020). The Effect of Accelerator Dosage on Fresh Concrete Properties and on Interlayer Strength in Shotcrete 3D Printing. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13020374
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.