CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Technological Understanding of Biofilm Detection Techniques: A Review

Achinas, Spyridon, Yska, Stijn Keimpe, Charalampogiannis, Nikolaos, Krooneman, Janneke, Euverink, Gerrit Jan Willem·2020·Materials
DOI 10.3390/ma13143147PMC PMC7412299
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Biofouling is a persistent problem in almost any water-based application in several industries. To eradicate biofouling-related problems in bioreactors, the detection of biofilms is necessary. The current literature does not provide clear supportive information on selecting biofilm detection techniques that can be applied to detect biofouling within bioreactors. Therefore, this research aims to review all available biofilm detection techniques and analyze their characteristic properties to provide a comparative assessment that researchers can use to find a suitable biofilm detection technique to investigate their biofilms. In addition, it discusses the confluence of common bioreactor fabrication materials in biofilm formation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ma13143147

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 A visualization of the five phenomena of biofilm formation. The figure indicates the conditions of the medium and the specific surface on which microbial adhesion occurs; the initial adherence of microorganisms to the surface; the proliferation (or else microcolony formation); and the maturation of the biofilm architecture with the presence of the polymeric matrix and its dispersion [7,9].
Figure 1 A visualization of the five phenomena of biofilm formation. The figure indicates the conditions of the medium and the specific surface on which microbial adhesion occurs; the initial adherence of microorganisms to the surface; the proliferation (or else microcolony formation); and the maturation of the biofilm architecture with the presence of the polymeric matrix and its dispersion [7,9].CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 155

  1. Li, 2007, Large-scale biodiesel production from microalga Chlorella protothecoides through heterothrophic cultivation in bioreactors, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 98, 764, 10.1002/bit.21489 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Liu, 2014, Stem cell engineering in bioreactors for large-scale bioprocessing, Eng. Life Sci., 14, 4, 10.1002/elsc.201300013 · DOI
  3. Barouni, 2018, Low volume bioreactor development in dairy industry based on encapsulated rennin in tubular cellulose/starch gel composite, Food Bioprocess Technol., 11, 194, 10.1007/s11947-017-2005-1 · DOI
  4. Osadolor, 2014, Introducing textiles as material of construction of ethanol bioreactors, Energies, 7, 7555, 10.3390/en7117555 · DOI
  5. Achinas, S., and Euverink, G. (2020). Development of an anaerobic digestion screening system using 3D-printed mini-bioreactors. New Advances on Fermentation Processes, IntechOpen. · DOI
  6. Vanysacker, 2014, Biofouling ecology as a means to better understand membrane biofouling, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 98, 8047, 10.1007/s00253-014-5921-2 · DOI
  7. Achinas, S., Charalampogiannis, N., and Euverink, G. (2019). A brief recap of microbial adhesion and biofilms. Appl. Sci., 9. · DOI
  8. Zaky, 2013, Application of atomic force microscopy for characterizing membrane biofouling in the micrometer and nanometer scales, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy, 32, 449, 10.1002/ep.11637 · DOI
  9. Azeredo, 2017, Critical review on biofilm methods, Crit. Rev. Microbiol., 43, 313, 10.1080/1040841X.2016.1208146 · DOI
  10. Garrett, 2008, Bacterial adhesion and biofilms on surfaces, Prog. Nat. Sci., 18, 1049, 10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.04.001 · DOI
  11. Slullitel, 2018, No lower bacterial adhesion for ceramics compared to other biomaterials, Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res., 104, 439, 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.03.003 · DOI
  12. Li, 2014, The importance of the viable but non-culturable state in human bacterial pathogens, Front. Microbiol., 5, 258, 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00258 · DOI
  13. Turan, O., Demirel, Y., Day, S., and Tezdogan, T. (2016, January 18–21). Experimental determination of added hydrodynamic resistance caused by marine biofouling on ships. Proceedings of the 6th European Transport Research Conference, Warsaw, Poland. · DOI
  14. Nguyen, 2012, Biofouling of water treatment membranes: A review of the underlying causes, monitoring techniques and control measures, Membranes, 2, 804, 10.3390/membranes2040804 · DOI
  15. Griskin, V., Iakuskin, O., and Stepenko, N. (2017). Biofouling detection based on image processing technique. Computer Science and Information Techniques (CSIT), IEEE. · DOI
  16. Barrena, 2019, Validation of CUSUM control chart for biofouling detection in heat exchangers, Appl. Therm. Eng., 152, 24, 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.02.009 · DOI
  17. Inaba, 2017, Architecture, component, and microbiome of biofilm involved in the fouling of membrane bioreactors, npj Biofilms Microbiomes, 3, 5, 10.1038/s41522-016-0010-1 · DOI
  18. Alav, 2018, Role of bacterial efflux pumps in biofilm formation, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 73, 2003, 10.1093/jac/dky042 · DOI
  19. Galdino, 2018, What are the advantages of living in a community? A microbial biofilm perspective!, Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, 113, 1
  20. Landoulsi, 2011, Review—Interactions between diatoms and stainless steel: Focus on biofouling and biocorrosion, Biofouling, 27, 1105, 10.1080/08927014.2011.629043 · DOI
  21. Klahre, 2000, Monitoring of biofouling in papermill process waters, Water Res., 34, 3657, 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00094-4 · DOI
  22. Lalot, S., and Mercère, G. (2008, January 17–20). Detection of fouling in a heat exchanger using a recursive subspace identification algorithm. Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena, Rejkjavik, Iceland.
  23. Barrena, 2017, Monitoring of fuel oil process of marine diesel engine, Appl. Therm. Eng., 127, 517, 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.08.036 · DOI
  24. Gheorghe, 2019, Image processing techniques used in soil moisture analysis, Inmateh Agric. Eng., 58, 147
  25. Ancuta, 2019, Bacterial monitoring of drinking water sources using immunofluorescence technique, image processing software and web-based data visualisation, Control Eng. Appl. Inform., 21, 54
  26. Fernandez, 2019, Preliminary assessment of visible, near-infrared, and short-wavelength–Infrared Spectroscopy with a Portable Instrument for the Detection of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on surfaces, J. Food Prot., 82, 1314, 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-567 · DOI
  27. Piri, 2018, A new approach to evaluate antibacterial activity of textile materials using image processing technique, Indian, J. Fibre Text. Res., 43, 483
  28. Zhiqiang, 2019, Visible-light-triggered self-reporting release of Nitric Oxide (NO) for bacterial biofilm dispersal, Macromolecules, 52, 7668, 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b01252 · DOI
  29. Oliver, L.M., Dunlop, P.S.M., Byrne, J.A., Blair, I.S., Boyle, M., McGuigan, K.G., and McAdams, E.T. (September, January 31). An impedimetric sensor for monitoring growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Proceedings of the International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, New York, NY, USA.
  30. Zikmund, A., Ripka, P., Krasny, L., Judl, T., and Jahoda, D. (2010, January 16–18). Biofilm detection by the impedance method. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Yantai, China. · DOI
  31. Bonetto, M.C., Sacco, N.J., Ohlsson, A.H., Cortón, E., Sticker, D., Charwat, V., and Ertl, P. (2014, January 15–18). Rapid and label-free differentiation of bacterial strains using low frequency electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Proceedings of the IEEE 9th IberoAmerican Congress on Sensors, Bogota, Colombia. · DOI
  32. Bimakr, 2018, Assessing graphite and stainless-steel for electrochemical sensing of biofilm growth in chlorinated drinking water systems, Sens. Actuators B Chem., 227, 526, 10.1016/j.snb.2018.09.005 · DOI
  33. Huiszoon, 2019, Flexible Platform for in situ impedimetric detection and bioelectric effect treatment of escherichia coli biofilms, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 66, 1337, 10.1109/TBME.2018.2872896 · DOI
  34. Fysun, 2019, Detection of P. polymyxa biofilm, dairy biofouling and CIP-cleaning agents using low-field NMR, Eur. Food Res. Technol., 245, 1719, 10.1007/s00217-019-03288-y · DOI
  35. Manz, 2003, Measuring local flow velocities and biofilm structure in biofilm systems with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Biotechnol. Bioeng., 84, 424, 10.1002/bit.10782 · DOI
  36. Burcaw, 2010, Propagator-resolved 2D exchange in porous media in the inhomogeneous magnetic field, J. Magn. Reson., 205, 209, 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.04.020 · DOI
  37. Windt, 2007, Correlated displacement—T2 MRI by means of a pulsed field gradient-multi spin echo method, J. Magn. Reson., 185, 230, 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.12.015 · DOI
  38. Vogt, 2013, Permeability of a growing biofilm in a porous media fluid flow analyzed by magnetic resonance displacement relaxation correlations, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 110, 1366, 10.1002/bit.24803 · DOI
  39. Li, 2006, A focused ultrasonic sensor for in situ detection of protein fouling on tubular ultrafiltration membranes, Sens. Actuators B Chem., 114, 182, 10.1016/j.snb.2005.04.041 · DOI
  40. Cui, 2011, Sensitive and versatile detection of the fouling process and fouling propensity of proteins on polyvinylidene fluoride membranes via surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, Anal. Chem., 83, 1709, 10.1021/ac102891g · DOI
  41. Mairal, 2000, Investigation of membrane fouling and cleaning using ultra sonic time-domain reflectometry, Desalination, 130, 45, 10.1016/S0011-9164(00)00073-4 · DOI
  42. Kujundzic, 2007, Ultrasonic monitoring of early stage biofilm growth on polymeric surfaces, J. Microbiol. Methods, 68, 458, 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.10.005 · DOI
  43. Sim, 2013, Monitoring membrane biofouling using ultra sonic time-domain reflectometry enhanced by silica dosing, J. Membr. Sci., 428, 24, 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.032 · DOI
  44. Wang, 2018, In situ monitoring of wastewater biofilm formation process via ultrasonic time domain reflectometry (UTDR), Chem. Eng. J., 334, 2134, 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.043 · DOI
  45. Xu, 2009, Visualization of fouling and diffusion behaviors during hollow fibermicrofiltration of oily wastewater by ultrasonic reflectometry andwavelet analysis, J. Membr. Sci., 341, 195, 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.009 · DOI
  46. Wilson, 2017, Quantitative and qualitative assessment methods for biofilm growth: A mini-review, Res. Rev. J. Eng. Technol., 6, 1
  47. Trulear, 1982, Dynamics of biofilm processes, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 54, 1288
  48. Koo, 2003, Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm accumulation and polysaccharide production by apigenin and tt-farnesol, J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 52, 782, 10.1093/jac/dkg449 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Wallstrom, 2005, Image analysis and laser induced fluorescence combined to determine growth on silicone rubber insulators, Polym. Degradation Stab., 88, 394, 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.12.009 · DOI
  50. Bengtsson, 2005, Fluorescence lidar imaging of fungal growth on high-voltage outdoor composite insulators, Opt. Lasers Eng., 43, 624, 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2004.09.019 · DOI
  51. Vieira, 2011, Effects of intertidal microphytobenthos migration on biomass determination via laser-induced fluorescence, Marine Ecol. Prog. Ser., 432, 45, 10.3354/meps09157 · DOI
  52. Utkin, A.B., Chaves, P., Fernandes, L., Pinto, I.V., and Revez, M.J. (2018, January 4–8). LIF and SFS techniques for early detection of biofilms harmful for cultural heritage. Proceedings of the International Conference Laser Optics (ICLO), Petersburg, Russia. · DOI
  53. Marques da Silva, J., and Utkin, A.B. (2018). Application of Laser-Induced Fluorescence in Functional Studies of Photosynthetic Biofilms. Processes, 6. · DOI
  54. 2014, Surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy: Concepts and chemical applications, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 53, 4756, 10.1002/anie.201205748 · DOI
  55. Chen, 2015, Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy monitoring the development of dual-species biofouling on membrane surfaces, J. Membr. Sci., 473, 36, 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.007 · DOI
  56. Kogler, 2016, Real-time Raman based approach for identification of biofouling, Sens. Actuators B Chem., 230, 411, 10.1016/j.snb.2016.02.079 · DOI
  57. 2019, Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) imaging of bioactive metabolites in mixed bacterial populations, Appl. Mater. Today, 14, 207, 10.1016/j.apmt.2018.12.005 · DOI
  58. Rajamani, 2019, Robust biofilm assay for quantification and high throughput screening applications, J. Microbiol. Methods, 159, 179, 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.02.018 · DOI
  59. Ojima, 2016, Antibiofilm effect of warfarin on biofilm formation of Escherichia coli promoted by antimicrobial treatment, J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist., 7, 102, 10.1016/j.jgar.2016.08.003 · DOI
  60. Stepanovic, 2000, A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococal biofilm formation, J. Microbiol. Methods, 40, 175, 10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00122-6 · DOI
  61. Peeters, 2008, Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates, J. Microbiol. Methods, 72, 157, 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.11.010 · DOI
  62. Escribano, 2014, Production of biofilm by Candida and non-Candida spp. isolates causing fungemia: Comparison of biomass production and metabolic activity and development of cut-off points, Int. J. Med. Microbiol., 304, 1192, 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.08.012 · DOI
  63. Gabrielson, 2002, Evaluation of redox indicators and the use of digital scanners and spectrophotometer for quantification of microbial growth in microplates, J. Microbiol. Methods, 50, 63, 10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00011-8 · DOI
  64. Li, 2018, Biosurfactant enhanced soil bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons: Design of experiments (DOE) based system optimization and phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) based microbial community analysis, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 132, 216, 10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.04.009 · DOI
  65. Wu, 2010, Does history matter? Temperature effects on soil microbial biomass and community structure based on the phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis, J. Soils Sediments, 10, 223, 10.1007/s11368-009-0118-5 · DOI
  66. Huang, 2019, Linking microbial respiratory activity with phospholipid fatty acid of biofilm from full-scale bioreactors, Bioresour. Technol., 272, 599, 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.051 · DOI
  67. 2007, Assessment of three-dimensional biofilm structure using an optical microscope, Biotechniques, 42, 616, 10.2144/000112403 · DOI
  68. Cazzaniga, 2003, A wound-isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa grows a biofilm in vitro within 10 hours and is visualized by light microscopy, Dermatol. Surg., 29, 631
  69. Dominiak, 2011, Extracellular DNA is abundant and important for microcolony strength in mixed microbial biofilms, Environ. Microbiol., 13, 710, 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02375.x · DOI
  70. Neu, T., and Lawrence, J. (2014). Investigation of microbial biofilm structure by laser scanning microscopy. Productive Biofilms, Springer. · DOI
  71. Sternber, 1999, Modern microscopy in biofilm research: Confocal microscopy and other approaches, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 10, 263, 10.1016/S0958-1669(99)80046-9 · DOI
  72. Stoica, 2018, Biofouling on RO-membranes used for water recovery in the dairy industry, J. Water Process Eng., 24, 1, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.05.004 · DOI
  73. Boguslavsky, 2018, Eliminating the need for biocidal agents in anti-biofouling polymers by applying grafted nanosilica instead, ACS Omega, 3, 12437, 10.1021/acsomega.8b01438 · DOI
  74. Jeong, 2018, Identification of preponderant marine bacteria and their biofouling characteristics on adsorbents of different sizes and shapes in seawater, J. Marine Sci. Technol., 26, 458
  75. Clayborn, 2015, Assessment of Salmonella spp. attachment to reusable plastic containers based on scanning electron microscopy and BAX PCR, J. Food Res., 4, 166, 10.5539/jfr.v4n2p166 · DOI
  76. Chatterjee, 2014, Atomic force microscopy in biofilm study, Microscopy, 63, 269, 10.1093/jmicro/dfu013 · DOI
  77. Merino, 2019, Biofilm formation by Salmonella sp. in de poultry industry: Detection, control and iradication strategies, Food Res. Int., 119, 530, 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.024 · DOI
  78. Fernandes, 2014, Ability of Salmonella spp. to produce biofilm is dependent on temperature and surface material, Foodborne Pathog. Dis., 11, 478, 10.1089/fpd.2013.1710 · DOI
  79. Norton, 1998, Using confocal laser scanning microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and phase contrast light microscopy to examine marine biofilms, Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 16, 199, 10.3354/ame016199 · DOI
  80. Doucet, 2005, Visualisation of natural aquatic colloids and particles—A comparison of conventional high vacuum and environmental scanning electron microscopy, J. Environ. Monit., 7, 115, 10.1039/b413832e · DOI
  81. Ozkan, 2016, Atomic force microscopy for the investigation of molecular and cellular behaviour, Micron, 89, 60, 10.1016/j.micron.2016.07.011 · DOI
  82. Phang, 2009, Atomic force microscopy of the morphology and mechanical behaviour of barnacle cyprid footprint proteins at the nanoscale, J. R. Soc. Interface, 7, 285, 10.1098/rsif.2009.0127 · DOI
  83. Hannig, 2010, Visualization of adherent micro-organisms using different techniques, J. Med. Microbiol., 59, 1, 10.1099/jmm.0.015420-0 · DOI
  84. Chen, 2019, Characteristics and influencing factors of amyloid fibers in S. mutans biofilm, AMB Express, 9, 31, 10.1186/s13568-019-0753-1 · DOI
  85. Ivnitsky, 2007, Bacterial community compostion and structure of biofilms developing on nanofiltration membranes applied to wastewater treatment, Water Res., 41, 3924, 10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.021 · DOI
  86. Birarda, 2019, Multi-technique microscopy investigation on bacterial biofilm matrices: A study on Klesbsiella pneumoniae clinical strains, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 411, 7315, 10.1007/s00216-019-02111-7 · DOI
  87. Kim, 2018, Liquid-phase transmission electron microscopy for studying colloidal inorganic nanoparticles, Adv. Mater., 30, 1703316, 10.1002/adma.201703316 · DOI
  88. Surman, 1996, Comparison of microscope techniques for the examination of biofilms, J. Microbiol. Methods, 25, 57, 10.1016/0167-7012(95)00085-2 · DOI
  89. Lawrence, 2003, Scanning transmission X-ray, laser scanning, and transmission electron microscopy mapping of the exopolymeric matrix of microbial films, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 69, 5543, 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5543-5554.2003 · DOI
  90. Takahashi, 2017, A microscopy method for scanning transmission electron microscopy imaging of the antibacterial activity of polymeric nanoparticles on a biofilm with an ionic liquid, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater., 105, 1432, 10.1002/jbm.b.33680 · DOI
  91. Poulickova, 2018, The low temperature method for environmental scanning electron microscopy—A new method for observation of diatom assemblages in vivo, Diatom Res., 33, 397, 10.1080/0269249X.2018.1545703 · DOI
  92. Krausko, 2014, Observation of a brine layer on an ice surface with an environmental scanning electron microscope at high temperatures and pressures, Langmuir, 30, 5441, 10.1021/la500334e · DOI
  93. Callow, 2003, Use of environmental scanning electron microscopy to image the spore adhesive of the marine alga Enteromorpha in its natural hydrated state, Colloids Surf. B Biointerface, 27, 315, 10.1016/S0927-7765(02)00094-2 · DOI
  94. Priester, 2007, Enhanced visualization of microbial biofilms by staining and environmental scanning electron microscopy, J. Microbiol. Methods, 68, 577, 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.10.018 · DOI
  95. Dynes, 2006, Speciation and quantitative mapping of metal species in microbial biofilms using scanning transmission X-ray microscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 1556, 10.1021/es0513638 · DOI
  96. Pennafirme, 2017, Imaging techniques for monitoring bacterial biofilms in environmental samples—An important tool for bioremediation studies, BAOJ Microbiol., 3, 1
  97. Hunter, 2008, Mapping the speciation of iron in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms using scanning transmission X-ray microscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 8766, 10.1021/es801642z · DOI
  98. Gilbert, 1999, Use soft X-ray microscopy for analysis of early-stage biofilm formation, Water Sci. Technol., 39, 269, 10.2166/wst.1999.0368 · DOI
  99. Zhang, 2019, Imaging the Microprocesses in biofilm matrices, Trends Biotechnol., 37, 214, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.07.006 · DOI
  100. Lawrence, 2012, Monitoring the fate of copper nanoparticles in river biofilms using scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM), Chem. Geol., 329, 18, 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.07.013 · DOI
  101. Akens, M., Chien, C., Katchky, R.N., Kreder, H.J., Finkelstein, J., and Whyne, C.M. (2018). The impact of thermal cycling on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm growth on stainless steel and titanium orthopaedic plates. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 19. · DOI
  102. Rigole, 2014, Optimization of resazurin-based viability staining for quantification of microbial biofilms, J. Microbiol. Methods, 98, 31, 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.12.011 · DOI
  103. Noble, 2005, A review of technologies for rapid detection of bacteria in recreational waters, J. Water Health, 3, 381, 10.2166/wh.2005.051 · DOI
  104. Hu, 2016, Bacterial biofilm infection detected in breast implant–associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 137, 1659, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002010 · DOI
  105. Suzuki, 2005, Quantitative analysis of multi-species oral biofilms by TaqMan Real-Time PCR, Clin. Med. Res., 3, 176, 10.3121/cmr.3.3.176 · DOI
  106. Nozawa, 1998, Quantitative detection of Enterobacter cloacae strain HO-1 in bioreactor for chromate wastewater treatment using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Water Res., 32, 3472, 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00106-7 · DOI
  107. Klein, 2012, Molecular approaches for viable bacterial population and transcriptional analyses in a rodent model of dental caries, Mol. Oral Microbiol., 27, 350, 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2012.00647.x · DOI
  108. Yang, 2019, Extraction and characterization of stratified extracellular polymeric substances in Geobacter biofilms, Bioresour. Technol., 276, 119, 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.100 · DOI
  109. Wu, 2019, Soil biofilm formation enhances microbial community diversity and metabolic activity, Environ. Int., 132, 105, 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105116 · DOI
  110. Ryser, S., Tenorio, E., Estelles, A., and Kauvar, L. (2019). Human antibody repertoire frequently includes antibodies to a bacterial biofilm associated protein. PLoS ONE, 14. · DOI
  111. Carrano, 2019, Anti-Candida albicans germ tube antibodies reduce in vitro growth and biofilm formation of C. albicans, Rev. Iberoam. Micol., 36, 9, 10.1016/j.riam.2018.07.005 · DOI
  112. Ariafar, 2019, Investigation of the effect of different environmental conditions on biofilm structure of Salmonella enterica serotype Virchow via FTIR spectroscopy, Arch. Microbiol., 201, 1233, 10.1007/s00203-019-01681-5 · DOI
  113. Serra, 2007, Continuous nondestructive monitoring of Bordetella pertussis biofilms by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and other corrobaorative techniques, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 387, 1759, 10.1007/s00216-006-1079-9 · DOI
  114. Cerusico, 2018, FTIR spectroscopy of chronic venous leg ulcer exudates: An approach to spectral healing marker identification, Analyst, 143, 1583, 10.1039/C7AN01909B · DOI
  115. Singhalage, 2018, Characterization of structural properties of fungal-bacterial biofilms by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, Ceylon J. Sci., 47, 77, 10.4038/cjs.v47i1.7490 · DOI
  116. Fortunato, 2016, Mini-review: Novel non-destructive in situ biofilm characterization techniques in membrane systems, Desalin. Water Treat., 57, 22894, 10.1080/19443994.2016.1180483 · DOI
  117. Vrouwenvelder, 2008, Nuclear magnetic resonance microscophy studies of membrane biofouling, J. Membr. Sci., 323, 37, 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.06.012 · DOI
  118. Ferreira, 2013, Candidaalbicans and Non-C. albicans Candida species: Comparison of biofilm production and metabolic activity in biofilms, and putative virulence properties of isolates from hospital environments and infections, Mycopathologia, 175, 265, 10.1007/s11046-013-9638-z · DOI
  119. Busscher, 2001, Analysis of bacterial detachment from substratum surfaces by the passage of air-liquid interfaces, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 67, 2531, 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2531-2537.2001 · DOI
  120. Reynoso, 2019, Photodynamic inactivation to prevent and disrupt Staphylococcus aureus biofilm under different media conditions, Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed., 35, 322, 10.1111/phpp.12477 · DOI
  121. Findlay, 1989, Efficacy of phospholipid analysis in determining microbial biomass in sediments, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 55, 2888, 10.1128/aem.55.11.2888-2893.1989 · DOI
  122. Khan, 2019, Early biofouling detection using fluorescence-based extracellular enzyme activity, Enzym. Microb. Technol., 27, 43, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2018.10.001 · DOI
  123. Marselina, 2007, Visualization of polysaccharide fouling on microporous membrane using different characterisation techniques, J. Membr. Sci., 290, 36, 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.12.012 · DOI
  124. Keasler, 2013, Expanding the microbial monitoring toolkit: Evaluation of traditional and molecular monitoring methods, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 81, 51, 10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.07.002 · DOI
  125. Tollersrud, 2002, Antibody responses in sheep vaccinated against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis; a comparison of two experimental vaccines containing different adjuvants, Vet. Res. Commun., 26, 587, 10.1023/A:1020960402112 · DOI
  126. Schmid, 2003, Process analysis of biofilm by photoacoustic spectroscopy, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 375, 1124, 10.1007/s00216-002-1690-3 · DOI
  127. Suci, 2001, Integration of Raman microscopy, differential interference contrast microscopy, and attenuated total reflection fourier transform infrared spectroscopy to investigate chlorhexidine spatial and temporal distribution in Canada albicans biofilms, J. Microbiol. Methods, 46, 193, 10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00268-8 · DOI
  128. Fortunato, 2017, Time-resolved monitoring of biofouling development on a flatsheet membrane using optical coherence tomography, Sci. Rep., 7, 15, 10.1038/s41598-017-00051-9 · DOI
  129. Fernandes, 2019, Adhesion of filamentous fungi isolated from drinking water under different process conditions, Water Res., 164, 114951, 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114951 · DOI
  130. Ferdous, 2016, Optimization and validation of real time PCR assays for absolute quantification of toxigenic vibrio cholerae and escherichia coli, Trop. Biomed., 33, 641
  131. Jabbari, 2017, All-polyamide composite coated-fabric as an alternative material of construction for Textile-Bioreactors (TBRs), Energies, 10, 19, 10.3390/en10111928 · DOI
  132. Blakebrough, 1973, Fundamentals of fermenter design, Pure Appl. Chem., 36, 305, 10.1351/pac197336030305 · DOI
  133. Rajala, 2018, Ennoblement, corrosion, and biofouling in brackish seawater: Comparison between six stainless steel grades, Bioelectrochemistry, 120, 27, 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2017.11.002 · DOI
  134. Parkar, 2001, Factors influencing attachment of thermophilic bacilli to stainless steel, J. Appl. Microbiol., 90, 901, 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01323.x · DOI
  135. Palmer, 2007, Bacterial cell attachment, the beginning of a biofilm, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 34, 577, 10.1007/s10295-007-0234-4 · DOI
  136. Hilbert, 2003, Influence of surface roughness of stainless steel on microbial adhesion and corrosion resistance, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 52, 175, 10.1016/S0964-8305(03)00104-5 · DOI
  137. Jullien, 2003, Identification of surface characteristics relevant to the hygienic status of stainless steel for the food industry, J. Food Eng., 56, 77, 10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00150-4 · DOI
  138. Li, 2018, Evolution of surface topography of 304L stainless steel irradiated by long pulse laser, AIP Adv., 8, 075211, 10.1063/1.5031831 · DOI
  139. Uyar, 2016, Bioreactor design for photofermentative hydrogen production, Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng., 39, 1331, 10.1007/s00449-016-1614-9 · DOI
  140. Zeriouh, 2017, Biofouling in photobioreactors for marine microalgae, Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 37, 1006, 10.1080/07388551.2017.1299681 · DOI
  141. Marques, 2007, Formation of biofilms by Staphylococcus aureus on stainless steel and glass surfaces and its resistance to some selected chemical santizers, Braz. J. Microbiol., 38, 538, 10.1590/S1517-83822007000300029 · DOI
  142. Amadu, 2017, Determination of the point of zero charge PH of borosilicate glass surface using capillary imbibition method, Int. J. Chem., 9, 67, 10.5539/ijc.v9n3p67 · DOI
  143. Han, 2017, Systematic study of functionalizable, Non-biofouling agarose films with protein and cellular patterns on glass slides, Chem. Asian J., 12, 846, 10.1002/asia.201700010 · DOI
  144. Pal, 2016, Experimental investigation of material removal and surface roughness during optical glass polishing, Mater. Manuf. Process., 31, 1613, 10.1080/10426914.2015.1103867 · DOI
  145. Fox, 2019, An Industry 4.0 Approach to the 3D Printing of composite materials, Engineering, 5, 621, 10.1016/j.eng.2019.06.003 · DOI
  146. Lee, 2019, Preliminary investigation of the reversible 4D Printing of a dual-layer component, Engineering, 5, 1159, 10.1016/j.eng.2019.09.007 · DOI
  147. Zhang, 2019, 3D Bioprinting: A novel avenue for manufacturing tissues and organs, Engineering, 5, 777, 10.1016/j.eng.2019.03.009 · DOI
  148. Yan, 2018, A review of 3D Printing technology for medical applications, Engineering, 4, 729, 10.1016/j.eng.2018.07.021 · DOI
  149. Palmer, 2020, 3D printing advances on multiple fronts, Engineering, 6, 590, 10.1016/j.eng.2020.04.005 · DOI
  150. Wang, 2018, The future of manufacturing: A new perspective, Engineering, 4, 722, 10.1016/j.eng.2018.07.020 · DOI
  151. Shi, 2019, Multi-objective optimization design through machine learning for drop-on-demand bioprinting, Engineering, 5, 586, 10.1016/j.eng.2018.12.009 · DOI
  152. Arinero, 2016, Nanoscale surface charge detection in epoxy resin materials using electrostatic force spectroscopy, AIP Adv., 6, 035318, 10.1063/1.4944953 · DOI
  153. Ionescu, 2012, Influence of surface properties of resin-based composites on in vitro S treptococcus mutans biofilm development, Eur. J. Oral Sci., 120, 458, 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00983.x · DOI
  154. Ono, 2007, Surface properties of resin composite materials relative to biofilm formation, Dent. Mater. J., 26, 613, 10.4012/dmj.26.613 · DOI
  155. Shimokawa, 2019, In vitro evaluation of surface properties and wear resistance of conventional and bulk-fill resin-based composites after brushing with a dentifrice, Oper. Dent., 44, 637, 10.2341/18-200-L · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 46

Metadata

Authors
Achinas, S., Yska, S. K., Charalampogiannis, N., Krooneman, J., & Euverink, G. J. W.
Venue
Materials
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-07-15
Volume
13
Issue
14
Pages
3147
ISSN
1996-1944
DOI
10.3390/ma13143147
PMC
PMC7412299
Cited by
46
References
0
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Technological Understanding of Biofilm Detection Techniques: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ma13143147
The paper
Achinas, S., Yska, S. K., Charalampogiannis, N., Krooneman, J., & Euverink, G. J. W. (2020). A Technological Understanding of Biofilm Detection Techniques: A Review. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13143147