Cited by 15Structural Load-Bearing AnalysisStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteInnovative concrete reinforcement materials

Experimental Investigation of Flexural Behavior of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete with Coarse Aggregate-Filled Steel Tubes

Open access
Wu, Fanghong, Zeng, Yanqin, Li, Ben, Lyu, Xuetao·2021·Materials

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental investigation of flexural behavior of circular ultra-high-performance concrete with coarse aggregate (CA-UHPC)-filled steel tubes (CA-UHPCFSTs). A total of seven flexural members were tested under a four-point bending load. The failure modes, overall deflection curves, moment-versus-curvature relationships, moment-versus-strain curves, strain distribution curves, ductility, flexural stiffness and ultimate flexural capacity were evaluated. The results indicate that the CA-UHPCFSTs under bending behaved in a good ductile manner. The CA-UHPC strength has a limited effect on the ultimate flexural capacity, while the addition of steel fiber can improve the ultimate flexural capacity. Increasing the steel tube thickness leads to higher flexural stiffness and ultimate flexural capacity. There is a significant confinement effect between the steel tube and the CA-UHPC core in the compressive zone and centroidal plane after the specimen enters the elastic-plastic stage, while the confinement effect in the tensile zone is minimal. Moreover, the measured flexural stiffness and ultimate flexural capacity were compared with the predictions using various design specifications. Two empirical formulas for calculating the initial and serviceability-level flexural stiffness of CA-UHPCFSTs are developed. Further research is required to propose the accurate design formula for the ultimate flexural capacity of CA-UHPCFSTs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ma14216354

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of steel fibers in UHPC-filled steel tube members can significantly improve the ductility, compressive ultimate bearing capacity, and flexural ultimate bearing capacity of these members.

    “The use of steel fibers in UHPC-filled steel tube (UHPC-FST) members can significantly improve the ductility, as well as compressive and flexural ultimate bearing capacity, of these members [19,20,21,22,23].”

    From Bond-Slip Performances of Ultra-High Performance Concrete Steel Tube Columns Made of a Large-Diameter Steel Tube with Internally Welded Steel Bars (2023) · cites this paper as [21]

    Section 3.7 reports a 13.8% increase in ductility index with steel fibers, and Section 3.5 reports a 25.6% increase in ultimate flexural capacity. The paper tests members under bending, not their ultimate compressive bearing capacity, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [28]GB 50936-2014 Technical Code for Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Structures Architecture & Buliding Press Beijing, China 2014 (In Chinese)
  2. [29]GB/T228 1–2010. Metallic Materials-Tensile Testing—Part1: Method of Test at Room Temperature China Standard Press Beijing, China 2010 (In Chinese)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, F., Zeng, Y., Li, B., & Lyu, X.
Affiliations
  • Foshan University (CN)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wu, Fanghong
  • Li, Ben
Venue
Materials
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-10-24
Volume
14
Issue
21
Pages
6354
ISSN
1996-1944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3209574815
Cited by
15
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51738011)
  • Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978538)
  • Science and Technology Innovation Platform of Foshan City, Guangdong Province, China (2016AG100341)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Keywords
ultra-high performance concrete, flexural behavior, four-point bending, moment-curvature relationship, ductility, bending stiffness, ultimate flexural capacity, steel fibers, confinement effects, steel tube thickness, design specifications, empirical formula

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review