Cited by 11Stochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesNeural Networks and ApplicationsMachine Learning and Data Classification

aSGD: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Adaptive Batch Size for Every Parameter

Open access
Shi, Haoze, Yang, Naisen, Tang, Hong, Yang, Xin·2022·Mathematics

Abstract

In recent years, deep neural networks (DNN) have been widely used in many fields. Lots of effort has been put into training due to their numerous parameters in a deep network. Some complex optimizers with many hyperparameters have been utilized to accelerate the process of network training and improve its generalization ability. It often is a trial-and-error process to tune these hyperparameters in a complex optimizer. In this paper, we analyze the different roles of training samples on a parameter update, visually, and find that a training sample contributes differently to the parameter update. Furthermore, we present a variant of the batch stochastic gradient decedent for a neural network using the ReLU as the activation function in the hidden layers, which is called adaptive stochastic gradient descent (aSGD). Different from the existing methods, it calculates the adaptive batch size for each parameter in the model and uses the mean effective gradient as the actual gradient for parameter updates. Experimental results over MNIST show that aSGD can speed up the optimization process of DNN and achieve higher accuracy without extra hyperparameters. Experimental results over synthetic datasets show that it can find redundant nodes effectively, which is helpful for model compression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/math10060863

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining the suggested ECDSA with the enhanced ECC-based three-factor multiserver authentication approach proposed by Bao et al. gives an even stronger and better security mechanism for IIoT systems.

    “We can even combine the suggested ECDSA, which the blockchain utilizes to generate new public keys, with the enhanced ECC-based three-factor multiserver authentication approach proposed by Bao et al. [185] to give an even stronger and better security mechanism for IIoT systems.”

    From A Critical Overview of Industrial Internet of Things Security and Privacy Issues Using a Layer-Based Hacking Scenario (2023) · cites this paper as [185]

    The Experiments and Conclusions sections discuss adaptive stochastic gradient descent, not authentication for IIoT systems. Searches for Bao’s ECC-based three-factor approach and for ECDSA, blockchain, and IIoT found no passage addressing the cited claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Fakoor, R.; Ladhak, F.; Nazi, A.; Huber, M. Using deep learning to enhance cancer diagnosis and classification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2013; Volume 28, pp. 3937-3949.
  2. Sutton, R.S.; Barto, A.G. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018.
  3. Tieleman, T.; Hinton, G. Lecture 6.5-rmsprop: Divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude. Coursera Neural Netw. Mach. Learn. 2012, 4, 26-31.
  4. Bengio, Y.; Senécal, J.S. Quick Training of Probabilistic Neural Nets by Importance Sampling; AISTATS: Key West, FL, USA, 2003; pp. 1-9.
  5. Nair, V.; Hinton, G.E. Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines; ICML: Haifa, Israel, 2010.
  6. Goodfellow, I.; Bengio, Y.; Courville, A.; Bengio, Y. Deep Learning; MIT Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016; Volume 1.
  7. Ji Chao, T.H. Visualization and Coding of Original Feature Space Partitioning Process Based on Fully Connected Neural Network. J. Signal Process. 2020, 36, 486-494. [CrossRef] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, H., Yang, N., Tang, H., & Yang, X.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Shandong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Tang, Hong
Venue
Mathematics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-03-09
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
863
ISSN
2227-7390 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4221055587
Cited by
11
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mathematics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (41971280)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
adaptive batch size, stochastic gradient descent, deep neural network training, hyperparameter optimization, ReLU activation, model compression, optimization acceleration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review