Cited by 18Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisRetirement, Disability, and Employment

Linking Pensions to Life Expectancy: Tackling Conceptual Uncertainty through Bayesian Model Averaging

Open access
Bravo, Jorge M., Ayuso, Mercedes·2021·Mathematics

Abstract

Linking pensions to longevity developments at retirement age has been one of the most common policy responses of pension schemes to aging populations. The introduction of automatic stabilizers is primarily motivated by cost containment objectives, but there are other dimensions of welfare restructuring in the politics of pension reforms, including recalibration, rationalization, and blame avoidance for unpopular policies that involve retrenchments. This paper examines the policy designs and implications of linking entry pensions to life expectancy developments through sustainability factors or life expectancy coefficients in Finland, Portugal, and Spain. To address conceptual and specification uncertainty in policymaking, we propose and apply a Bayesian model averaging approach to stochastic mortality modeling and life expectancy computation. The results show that: (i) sustainability factors will generate substantial pension entitlement reductions in the three countries analyzed; (ii) the magnitude of the pension losses depends on the factor design; (iii) to offset pension cuts and safeguard pension adequacy, individuals will have to prolong their working lives significantly; (iv) factor designs considering cohort longevity markers would have generated higher pension cuts in countries with increasing life expectancy gap.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/math9243307

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The customary approach to data-driven modelling is to neglect model risk and select a single 'best' model from a set of candidate learners using statistical criteria.

    “The customary approach to data-driven modelling is to neglect model risk and pursue a 'winner-takes-all' perspective by which, for each dataset, a unique believed to be the 'best' model is selected from a set of candidate (weak) learners using some method or statistical criteria (goodness-of-fit, predictive), see Bravo and Ayuso (2021).”

    From Modelling Motor Insurance Claim Frequency and Severity Using Gradient Boosting (2023) · cites this paper as Bravo and Ayuso (2021)

    The Introduction describes a standard “winner-take-all” approach that selects one best model using statistical criteria and neglects model uncertainty. It makes this claim specifically about age-specific mortality forecasting, not data-driven modelling generally; it also calls the alternatives candidate approaches rather than weak learners. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Al-Nator, M.; Al-Nator, S. Accumulative Pension Schemes with Various Decrement Factors. Mathematics 2020, 8, 2081. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Bosworth, B.; Weaver, K. Social Security on Auto-Pilot: International Experience with Automatic Stabilizer Mechanisms. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College Working Paper No. 2011-18. 2011. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1970310 (accessed 30 September 2021).
  3. Barr, N.; Diamond, P. Reforming pensions: Principles, analytical errors and policy directions. Int. Soc. Secur. Rev. 2009, 62, 5-29. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Ebbinghaus, B. The Privatization and Marketization of Pensions in Europe: A Double Transformation Facing the Crisis. Eur. Policy Anal. 2015, 1, 56-73. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Carrera, L.; Angelaki, M. The Diversity and Causality of Pension Reform Pathways: A Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis. J. Soc. Policy 2020, 49, 582-600. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Bonoli, G.; Palier, B. When past reforms open new opportunities: Comparing old age insurance reforms in Bismarckian welfare systems. Soc. Policy Adm. 2007, 41, 555-573. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Bravo, J.M. Taxation of Pensions in Portugal: A Semi-Dual Income Tax System. CESifo DICE Rep. 2016, 14, 14-23.
  8. Bravo, J.M. Funding for longer lives: Retirement wallet and risk-sharing annuities. Ekonomiaz 2019, 96, 268-291.
  9. Bravo, J.M. Longevity-Linked Life Annuities: A Bayesian Model Ensemble Pricing Approach. In Proceedings of the Atas da 20th Conferência da Associação Portuguesa de Sistemas de Informação 2020, Porto, Portugal, 11-12 October 2020; CAPSI 2020 Proceedings. Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/capsi2020/29 (accessed on 30 January 2021).
  10. Bravo, J.M.; de Freitas, N.E.M. Valuation of longevity-linked life annuities. Insur. Math. Econ. 2018, 78, 212-229. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Olivieri, A. Designing Annuities with Flexibility Opportunities in an Uncertain Mortality Scenario. Risks 2021, 9, 189. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Holzmann, R., Palmer, E., Robalino, D., Eds.; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; pp. 395-436.
  13. Ayuso, M.; Bravo, J.M.; Holzmann, R. Getting Life Expectancy Estimates Right for Pension Policy: Period versus Cohort Approach. J. Pension Econ. Financ. 2021, 20, 212-231. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Goldstein, J.R.; Wachter, K.W. Relationships between period and cohort life expectancy: Gaps and lags. Popul. Stud. 2006, 60, 257-269. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  15. Bravo, J.M.; Ayuso, M.; Holzmann, R.; Palmer, E. Addressing the life expectancy gap in pension policy. Insur. Math. Econ. 2021, 99, 200-221. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Walker, W.E.; Marchau, V.A. Dealing with Uncertainty in Policy Analysis and Policymaking. Integr. Assess. 2003, 4, 1-4. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Ayuso, M.; Bravo, J.M.; Holzmann, R. On the heterogeneity in longevity among socioeconomic groups: Scope, trends, and implications for Earnings-Related Pension Schemes. Glob. J. Hum. Soc. Sci.-Econ. 2017, 17, 31-57. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Chetty, R.; Stepner, M.; Abraham, S.; Lin, S.; Scuderi, B.; Turner, N.; Bergeron, A.; Cutler, D. The association between income and life expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2016, 315, 1750-1766. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  19. van Raalte, A.; Sasson, I.; Martikainen, P. The case for monitoring life-span inequality. Science 2018, 362, 1002-1004. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Atance, D.; Debón, A.; Navarro, E. A Comparison of Forecasting Mortality Models Using Resampling Methods. Mathematics 2020, 8, 1550. [CrossRef] · DOI
  21. Bravo, J.M.; Nunes, J.P.V. Pricing Longevity Derivatives via Fourier Transforms. Insur. Math. Econ. 2021, 96, 81-97. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Brouhns, N.; Denuit, M.; Vermunt, J.K. A Poisson Log-Bilinear Regression approach to the construction of projected life tables. Insur. Math. Econ. 2002, 31, 373-393. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Cairns, A.J.G.; Blake, D.; Dowd, K.; Coughlan, G.D.; Epstein, D.; Ong, A.; Balevich, I. A quantitative comparison of stochastic mortality models using data from England and Wales and the United States. N. Am. Actuar. J. 2009, 13, 1-35. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Cairns, A.J.G.; Blake, D.; Kessler, A.; Kessler, M. The Impact of COVID-19 on Future Higher-Age Mortality. 2020. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3606988 (accessed on 31 Aug 2021).
  25. Camarda, C.G. Smooth constrained mortality forecasting. Demogr. Res. 2019, 41, 1091-1130. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Huang, J.Z.; Shen, H.; Buja, A. The analysis of two-way functional data using two-way regularized singular value decompositions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2009, 104, 1609-1620. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Hyndman, R.J.; Ullah, M.S. Robust forecasting of mortality and fertility rates: A functional data approach. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2007, 51, 4942-4956. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Hyndman, R.J.; Booth, H.; Yasmeen, F. Coherent mortality forecasting: the product-ratio method with functional time series models. Demography 2013, 50, 261-283. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Jevtić, P.; Regis, L. A continuous-time stochastic model for the mortality surface of multiple populations. Insur. Math. Econ. 2019, 88, 181-195. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Lee, R.D.; Carter, L.R. Modeling and forecasting U.S. mortality. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1992, 87, 659-671. [CrossRef] · DOI
  31. Li, N.; Lee, R. Coherent mortality forecasts for a group of populations: an extension of the Lee-Carter method. Demography 2005, 42, 575-594. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Li, H.; Tan, K.S.; Tuljapurkar, S.; Zhu, W. Gompertz law revisited: Forecasting mortality with a multi-factor exponential model. Insur. Math. Econ. 2021, 99, 268-281. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Pascariu, M.; Basellini, U.; Aburto, J.; Canudas-Romo, V. The Linear Link: Deriving Age-Specific Death Rates from Life Expectancy. Risks 2020, 8, 109. [CrossRef] · DOI
  34. Plat, R. On stochastic mortality modeling. Insur. Math. Econ. 2009, 45, 393-404. [CrossRef] · DOI
  35. Renshaw, A.E.; Haberman, S. A cohort-based extension to the Lee-Carter Model for mortality reduction factors. Insur. Math. Econ. 2006, 38, 556-570. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. Zhang, L.; Shen, H.; Huang, J.Z. Robust regularized singular value decomposition with application to mortality data. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2013, 7, 1540-1561. [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. Bravo, J.M.; Ayuso, M. Previsões de mortalidade e de esperança de vida mediante combinação Bayesiana de modelos: Uma aplicação à população portuguesa. RISTI-Rev. Iber. Sist. Tecnol. Inf. 2020, E40, 128-144. [CrossRef] · DOI
  38. Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Dzemyda, G., Moreira, F., Ramalho Correia, A.M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 1365, pp. 123-135. [CrossRef] · DOI
  39. Kontis, V.; Bennett, J.; Mathers, C.; Li, G.; Foreman, K.; Ezzati, M. Future life expectancy in 35 industrialised countries: projections with a Bayesian model ensemble. Lancet 2017, 389, 1323-1335. [CrossRef] · DOI
  40. Turek, D.; Fletcher, D. Model-Averaged Wald Confidence Intervals. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2012, 56, 2809-2815. [CrossRef] · DOI
  41. Bravo, J.M. Pricing participating longevity-linked life annuities: A Bayesian Model Ensemble approach. Eur. Actuar. J. 2021. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  42. Bravo, J.M.; Herce, J.A. Career breaks, Broken pensions? Long-run effects of early and late-career unemployment spells on pension entitlements. J. Pension Econ. Financ. 2020, 1-27. [CrossRef] · DOI
  43. Devesa, E.; Devesa, M.; Dominguez-Fabián, I.; Encinas, B.; Meneu, R. The Sustainability Factor: How Much Do Pension Expenditures Improve in Spain? Risks 2020, 8, 134. [CrossRef] · DOI
  44. Raftery, A.E.; Gneiting, T.; Balabdaoui, F.; Polakowski, M. Using Bayesian Model Averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles. J. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2005, 133, 1155-1174. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  45. Cairns, A.J.G.; Blake, D.; Dowd, K. A two-factor model for stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty: Theory and calibration. J. Risk Insur. 2006, 73, 687-718. [CrossRef] · DOI
  46. Denuit, M.; Goderniaux, A.-C. Closing and projecting life tables using log-linear models. Bull. Swiss Assoc. Actuar. 2005, 1, 29-48.
  47. Hunt, A.; Blake, D. On the structure and classification of mortality models. N. Am. Actuar. J. 2021, 25, S215-S234. [CrossRef] · DOI
  48. Shang, H.L.; Booth, H.; Hyndman, R.J. Point and interval forecasts of mortality rates and life expectancy: A comparison of ten principal component methods. Demogr. Res. 2011, 25, 173-214. [CrossRef · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bravo, J. M., & Ayuso, M.
Affiliations
  • MagIC (PT)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Bravo, Jorge M.
Venue
Mathematics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-12-19
Volume
9
Issue
24
Pages
3307
ISSN
2227-7390 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200403779
Cited by
18
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mathematics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (UIDB/04152/2020 - Centro de Investigação em Gestão de Informação (MagIC))
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación España (PID2019- 834 105986GB-C21)
  • Secretaria d’Universitats i Recerca del departament d’Empresa i 835 Coneixement de la Generalitat de Catalunya (2020-PANDE-00074)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
pensions, life expectancy, automatic stabilizers, sustainability factors, population aging, pension reform, pension adequacy, working life extension, Bayesian model averaging, Finland, Portugal, Spain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review