Cited by 44Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

Automatic Indexation of the Pension Age to Life Expectancy: When Policy Design Matters

Open access
Ayuso, Mercedes, Bravo, Jorge M., Holzmann, Robert, Palmer, Edward·2021·Risks

Abstract

Increasing retirement ages in an automatic or scheduled way with increasing life expectancy at retirement is a popular pension policy response to continuous longevity improvements. The question addressed here is: to what extent is simply adopting this approach likely to fulfill the overall goals of policy? To shed some light on the answer, we examine the policies of four countries that have recently introduced automatic indexation of pension ages to life expectancy–The Netherlands, Denmark, Portugal and Slovakia. To this end, we forecast an alternative period and cohort life expectancy measures using a Bayesian Model Ensemble of heterogeneous stochastic mortality models comprised of parametric models, principal component methods, and smoothing approaches. The approach involves both the selection of the model confidence set and the determination of optimal weights. Model-averaged Bayesian credible prediction intervals are derived accounting for various stochastic process, model, and parameter risks. The results show that: (i) retirement ages are forecasted to increase substantially in the coming decades, particularly if a constant period in retirement is targeted; (ii) retirement age policy outcomes may substantially deviate from the policy goal(s) depending on the design adopted and its implementation; and (iii) the choice of a cohort over period life expectancy measure matters. In addition, the distributional issues arising with the increasing socio-economic gap in life expectancy remain largely unaddressed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/risks9050096

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ensemble methods can provide superior predictive accuracy relative to single learners in several domain-specific areas.

    “Empirical studies show that they can provide superior predictive accuracy relative to single learners in several domain-specific areas (Ashofteh et al. 2022; Ayuso et al. 2021; Bravo 2021; Kim and Baek 2022).”

    From Modelling Motor Insurance Claim Frequency and Severity Using Gradient Boosting (2023) · cites this paper as Ayuso et al. 2021

    The Introduction states that ensemble learning has improved traditional and machine-learning forecasts, supporting the possibility of better predictive accuracy. The Results discuss mortality-forecasting model weights but do not compare the ensemble’s accuracy with single models; this paper also does not establish the claim across several domain-specific areas. The supplied copy gives section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Ayuso, Mercedes, Jorge M. Bravo, and Robert Holzmann. 2017b. Addressing longevity heterogeneity in pension scheme design. Journal of Finance and Economics 6: 1-21.
  2. Ayuso, Mercedes, Jorge M. Bravo, and Robert Holzmann. 2021. Getting Life Expectancy Estimates Right for Pension Policy: Period versus Cohort Approach. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 20: 212-31.
  3. Bravo, Jorge M., and Jose A. Herce. 2020. Career breaks, Broken pensions? Long-run effects of early and late-career unemployment spells on pension entitlements. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 1-27.
  4. Rocha, H. Adeli, G. Dzemyda, F. Moreira and A.M. Ramalho Correia. Cham: Springer, vol. 1365, pp. 123-35.
  5. Brouhns, Natacha, Michel Denuit, and Ingrid Van Keilegom. 2005. Bootstrapping the Poisson Log-Bilinear Model for Mortality Forecasting. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 3: 212-24.
  6. Cairns, Andrew J. G., David Blake, and Kevin Dowd. 2006. A two-factor model for stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty: Theory and calibration. Journal of Risk and Insurance 73: 687-718.
  7. Chetty, Raj, Michael Stepner, Sarah Abraham, Shelby Lin, Benjamin Scuderi, Nicholas Turner, Augustin Bergeron, and David Cutler. 2016. The association between income and life expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014. The Journal of the American Medical Association 315: 1750-66.
  8. D'Amato, Valeria, Steven Haberman, Gabriella Piscopo, Maria Russolillo, and Lorenzo Trapani. 2014. Detecting Common Longevity Trends by a Multiple Population Approach. North American Actuarial Journal 18: 139-49.
  9. Holzmann, Robert, and John Piggott. 2018. The Taxation of Pensions. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  10. Holzmann, Robert, Mercedes Ayuso, and Jorge M. Bravo. 2019. Reframing lifecycle saving and dissaving by low-, middle-, and high-income groups: Initial hypotheses, literature review, and ideas for empirical testing. In IZA Discussion Paper No. 12655. Bonn: IZA Institute of Labor Economics.
  11. Hunt, Andrew, and David Blake. 2021. On the structure and classification of mortality models. North American Actuarial Journal 25: S215-S234.
  12. Lee, Ronald D., and Lawrence R. Carter. 1992. Modeling and forecasting U.S. mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association 87: 659-71.
  13. NASEM (National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine). 2015. The growing gap in life expectancy by income: Implications for federal programs and policy responses. In Committee on the Long-Run Macroeconomic Effects of the Aging U.S. Population. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. OECD. 2019. Pensions at a Glance 2019: OECD and G20 Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  14. Raftery, Adrian E., Tilmann Gneiting, Fadoua Balabdaoui, and Michael Polakowski. 2005. Using Bayesian Model Averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles. Journal of American Meteorological Society 133: 1155-74.
  15. Samuels, Jon D., and Rodrigo M. Sekkel. 2017. Model confidence sets and forecast combination. International Journal of Forecasting 33: 48-60.
  16. Villegas, Andrés M., Steven Haberman, Vladimir K. Kaishev, and Pietro Millossovich. 2017. A comparative study of two-population models for the assessment of basis risk in longevity hedges. ASTIN Bulletin 47: 631-79.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ayuso, M., Bravo, J. M., Holzmann, R., & Palmer, E.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • Centro de Estudos e Formação Avançada em Gestão e Economia (PT)
  • Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Ayuso, Mercedes
Venue
Risks
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-05-13
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
96
ISSN
2227-9091 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3162970916
Cited by
44
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10
FWCI
13.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Risks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords
retirement age, life expectancy, longevity risk, pension policy, cohort life expectancy, period life expectancy, stochastic mortality models, model confidence set, policy design, Netherlands, Denmark, Portugal, Slovakia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review