CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 149Membrane-based Ion Separation TechniquesMembrane Separation TechnologiesNanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards Electrochemical Water Desalination Techniques: A Review on Capacitive Deionization, Membrane Capacitive Deionization and Flow Capacitive Deionization

Open access
Folaranmi, Gbenro, Bechelany, Mikhael, Sistat, Philippe, Cretin, Marc, Zaviska, Francois·2020·Membranes
DOI 10.3390/membranes10050096PMC PMC7281590
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Electrochemical water desalination has been a major research area since the 1960s with the development of capacitive deionization technique. For the latter, its modus operandi lies in temporary salt ion adsorption when a simple potential difference (1.0–1.4 V) of about 1.2 V is supplied to the system to temporarily create an electric field that drives the ions to their different polarized poles and subsequently desorb these solvated ions when potential is switched off. Capacitive deionization targets/extracts the solutes instead of the solvent and thus consumes less energy and is highly effective for brackish water. This paper reviews Capacitive Deionization (mechanism of operation, sustainability, optimization processes, and shortcomings) with extension to its counterparts (Membrane Capacitive Deionization and Flow Capacitive Deionization).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/membranes10050096

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Advances in electrochemical technologies for desalination (a) in terms of published papers by Wang et al. [3] (b) in terms of exploitation/utilization per technology.
Figure 1 Advances in electrochemical technologies for desalination (a) in terms of published papers by Wang et al. [3] (b) in terms of exploitation/utilization per technology.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 A schematic diagram of electrodialysis (ED) where C is the concentrate compartment and D is the dilute compartment.
Figure 2 A schematic diagram of electrodialysis (ED) where C is the concentrate compartment and D is the dilute compartment.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Distribution of charges as described by Gouy–Chapman.
Figure 3 Distribution of charges as described by Gouy–Chapman.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Schematic diagram (a) of capacitive deionization CDI set up [29], (b) CDI cell.
Figure 4 Schematic diagram (a) of capacitive deionization CDI set up [29], (b) CDI cell.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Schematic representation of CDI during (a) adsorption and (b) desorption process.
Figure 5 Schematic representation of CDI during (a) adsorption and (b) desorption process.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Schematic diagram of CDI performance indices.
Figure 6 Schematic diagram of CDI performance indices.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Schematic representation of membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) system.
Figure 7 Schematic representation of membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) system.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 8 Schematic representation flow capacitive deionization (FCDI) system.
Figure 8 Schematic representation flow capacitive deionization (FCDI) system.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 9 Schematic diagrams of FCDI in continuous mode via (a) FCDI coupled with ultrafiltration and (b) two FCDI cells.
Figure 9 Schematic diagrams of FCDI in continuous mode via (a) FCDI coupled with ultrafiltration and (b) two FCDI cells.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 10 Trend in energy reduction in ED as reported by Sajjad et al. [21].
Figure 10 Trend in energy reduction in ED as reported by Sajjad et al. [21].CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 115 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Choules, P. (2010, January 30). Update on large scale ocean desal plants. Proceedings of the II Seminario Internacional Desalación, Antofagasta, Chile.
  2. Lopez, F., Araus, M., Gimenez, R., Munoz, E., Romero, G., and Bastida, J.M. (2015). Energy consumption optimization in a large seawater desalination plant (Aguilas, 210,000 m3/day). International Desalination Association World Congress on Desalination and Water Reuse, International Desalination Association. Conference held in San Diego, CA, USA.
  3. Helmholtz, 1883, Theory of the double electric layer, J. Frankl. Inst., 110, 217
  4. Bockris, J.O., Reddy, A.K.N., and Gamboa-Aldeco, M. (2000). Modern Electrochemistry, Kluwer Academic/Springer Publishing Company. [2nd ed.].
  5. Clare, 2019, Low cost desalination of brackish ground water by Capacitive Deionization (CDI)—Implications for irrigated agriculture, Desalination, 451, 37

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–148 of 148

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Folaranmi, G., Bechelany, M., Sistat, P., Cretin, M., & Zaviska, F.
Affiliations
  • École Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier (FR)
  • Institut Européen des Membranes, IEM, UMR-5635, University Montpellier, ENSCM, CNRS, Place Eugène Bataillon, CEDEX 05, 34095 Montpellier, France
ORCID
Venue
Membranes
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-05-12
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
96
ISSN
2077-0375 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/membranes10050096
PMC
PMC7281590
OpenAlex
W3025469769
Cited by
149
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Membranes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Australian Government
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Membrane Separation Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Keywords
capacitive deionization, membrane capacitive deionization, brackish water treatment, energy consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review