The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium Resources and Production: Critical Assessment and Global Projections
Open accessAbstract
This paper critically assesses if accessible lithium resources are sufficient for expanded demand due to lithium battery electric vehicles. The ultimately recoverable resources (URR) of lithium globally were estimated at between 19.3 (Case 1) and 55.0 (Case 3) Mt Li; Best Estimate (BE) was 23.6 Mt Li. The Mohr 2010 model was modified to project lithium supply. The Case 1 URR scenario indicates sufficient lithium for a 77% maximum penetration of lithium battery electric vehicles in 2080 whereas supply is adequate to beyond 2200 in the Case 3 URR scenario. Global lithium demand approached a maximum of 857 kt Li/y, with a 100% penetration of lithium vehicles, 3.5 people per car and 10 billion population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Lithium Availability: A Constraint for Electric Vehicles?
Gruber, P. W., Medina, P. A., Keoleian, G. A., Kesler, S. E., Everson, M. P., & Wallington, T. J. (2011) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00359.x · Cited by 620
Yaksic, A., & Tilton, J. E. (2009) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2009.05.002 · Cited by 328
(2004) · doi:10.1016/b978-012276152-2/50038-4 · Cited by 93
Cited by
Commercialization of Lithium Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicles
Zeng, X., Li, M., Abd El‐Hady, D., Alshitari, W., Al‐Bogami, A. S., Lu, J., & Amine, K. (2019) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201900161 · Cited by 1,542
Meshram, P., Pandey, B. D., & Mankhand, T. R. (2014) · Hydrometallurgy · doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.10.012 · Cited by 982
Lithium availability and future production outlooks
Vikström, H., Davidsson, S., & Höök, M. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.005 · Cited by 926
Life cycle assessment of a lithium-ion battery vehicle pack
Ellingsen, L. A., Majeau‐Bettez, G., Singh, B., Srivastava, A. K., Valøen, L. O., & Strømman, A. H. (2014) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12072 · Cited by 665
Greim, P., Solomon, A. A., & Breyer, C. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18402-y · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohr, S. H., Mudd, G. M., & Giurco, D.
- Venue
- Minerals
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2012-03-19
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-84
- ISSN
- 2075-163X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032783026
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithium Resources and Production: Critical Assessment and Global Projections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/min2010065
- The paper
- Mohr, S. H., Mudd, G. M., & Giurco, D. (2012). Lithium Resources and Production: Critical Assessment and Global Projections. Minerals. https://doi.org/10.3390/min2010065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
