The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peptide Phage Display as a Tool for Drug Discovery: Targeting Membrane Receptors
Open accessAbstract
Ligands selected from phage-displayed random peptide libraries tend to be directed to biologically relevant sites on the surface of the target protein. Consequently, peptides derived from library screenings often modulate the target protein’s activity in vitro and in vivo and can be used as lead compounds in drug design and as alternatives to antibodies for target validation in both genomics and drug discovery. This review discusses the use of phage display to identify membrane receptor modulators with agonistic or antagonistic activities. Because isolating or producing recombinant membrane proteins for use as target molecules in library screening is often impossible, innovative selection strategies such as panning against whole cells or tissues, recombinant receptor ectodomains, or neutralizing antibodies to endogenous binding partners were devised. Prominent examples from a two-decade history of peptide phage display will be presented, focusing on the design of affinity selection experiments, methods for improving the initial hits, and applications of the identified peptides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How many drug targets are there?
Overington, J. P., Al-Lazikani, B., & Hopkins, A. L. (2006) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2199 · Cited by 3,505
Engineering the Fc region of immunoglobulin G to modulate in vivo antibody levels
Vaccaro, C., Zhou, J., Ober, R. J., & Ward, E. S. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1143 · Cited by 407
Lien, S., & Lowman, H. B. (2003) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.10.005 · Cited by 209
A comparison of the immunogenicity of a pair of enantiomeric proteins
Dintzis, H. M., Symer, D. E., Dintzis, R. Z., Zawadzke, L. E., & Berg, J. M. (1993) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340160309 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Challenges in design and characterization of ligand-targeted drug delivery systems
Muro, S. (2012) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.05.052 · Cited by 307
Targeted drug delivery for cancer therapy: the other side of antibodies
Firer, M. A., & Gellerman, G. (2012) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/1756-8722-5-70 · Cited by 269
Advancing Peptide-Based Biorecognition Elements for Biosensors Using in-Silico Evolution
Xiao, X., Kuang, Z., Slocik, J. M., Tadepalli, S., Brothers, M., Kim, S., Mirau, P. A., Butkus, C., Farmer, B. L., Singamaneni, S., et al. (2018) · ACS Sensors · doi:10.1021/acssensors.8b00159 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Molek, P., Strukelj, B., & Bratkovic, T.
- Venue
- Molecules
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2011-01-21
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 857-887
- ISSN
- 1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066892610
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peptide Phage Display as a Tool for Drug Discovery: Targeting Membrane Receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/molecules16010857
- The paper
- Molek, P., Strukelj, B., & Bratkovic, T. (2011). Peptide Phage Display as a Tool for Drug Discovery: Targeting Membrane Receptors. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16010857
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.