Cited by 288Phytochemistry and Biological ActivitiesPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesEssential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity

Phytochemical profiling of flavonoids, phenolic acids, terpenoids, and volatile fraction of a rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) extract

Open access
Mena, Pedro, Cirlini, Martina, Tassotti, Michele, Herrlinger, Kelli, Dall’Asta, Chiara, Del Rio, Daniele·2016·Molecules

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the phytochemical profile of a proprietary rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) extract rich in carnosic acid. A characterization of the (poly)phenolic and volatile fractions of the extract was carried out using mass spectrometric techniques. The (poly)phenolic composition was assessed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ESI-MSn) and a total of 57 compounds were tentatively identified and quantified, 14 of these being detected in rosemary extract for the first time. The rosemary extract contained 24 flavonoids (mainly flavones, although flavonols and flavanones were also detected), 5 phenolic acids, 24 diterpenoids (carnosic acid, carnosol, and rosmanol derivatives), 1 triterpenoid (betulinic acid), and 3 lignans (medioresinol derivatives). Carnosic acid was the predominant phenolic compound. The volatile profile of the rosemary extract was evaluated by head space solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) linked to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Sixty-three volatile molecules (mainly terpenes, alcohols, esters, aldehydes, and ketones) were identified. This characterization extends the current knowledge on the phytochemistry of Rosmarinus officinalis and is, to our knowledge, the broadest profiling of its secondary metabolites to date. It can assist in the authentication of rosemary extracts or rosemary-containing products or in testing its bioactivity. Moreover, this methodological approach could be applied to the study of other plant-based food ingredients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/molecules21111576

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For R. officinalis, the phenolic diterpenes carnosic acid and carnosol are considered important chemotaxonomic markers.

    “and, for R. officinalis, the phenolic diterpenes carnosic acid and carnosol are also considered important (Mena et al., 2016;Troncoso et al., 2005;Yeddes et al., 2019;Yilmaz et al., 2018;Zhang et al., 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mena, P., Cirlini, M., Tassotti, M., Herrlinger, K., Dall’Asta, C., & Del Rio, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • Kemin Foods, L.C., 2100 Maury Street, Des Moines, IA 50317, USA
  • Department of Food Science, University of Parma, Parma 43125, Italy
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2016-11-19
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
1576
ISSN
1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2556661692
Cited by
288
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry and Biological Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
Keywords
Rosmarinus officinalis, phytochemical profiling, carnosic acid, flavonoids, phenolic acids, diterpenoids, carnosol, rosmanol, betulinic acid, lignans, volatile compounds, terpenes, secondary metabolites, plant-based food ingredients
MeSH terms
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Flavonoids, Plant Extracts, Mass Spectrometry, Terpenes, Molecular Structure, Rosmarinus, Volatile Organic Compounds, Hydroxybenzoates, Phytochemicals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review