Cited by 46Insect Pest Control StrategiesEssential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityInsect Pheromone Research and Control

Optimal Extraction of Ocimum basilicum Essential Oil by Association of Ultrasound and Hydrodistillation and Its Potential as a Biopesticide Against a Major Stored Grains Pest

Open access
da Silva Moura, Eridiane, D’Antonino Faroni, Lêda Rita, Fernandes Heleno, Fernanda, Aparecida Zinato Rodrigues, Alessandra, Figueiredo Prates, Lucas Henrique, Lopes Ribeiro de Queiroz, Maria Eliana·2020·Molecules

Abstract

The essential oil of basil (Ocimum basilicum) has significant biological activity against insect pests and can be extracted through various techniques. This work aimed to optimize and validate the extraction process of the essential oil of O. basilicum submitted to different drying temperatures of the leaves and extracted by the combination of a Clevenger method and ultrasound. The biological activity of the extracted oil under different conditions was evaluated for potential control of Sitophilus zeamais. The extraction method was optimized according to the sonication time by ultrasound (0, 8, 19, 31 and 38 min) and hydrodistillation (20, 30, 45, 60 and 70 min) and drying temperature (20, 30, 45, 60 and 70 °C). The bioactivity of the essential oil was assessed against adults of S. zeamais and the effects of each variable and its interactions on the mortality of the insects were evaluated. The best yield of essential oil was obtained with the longest sonication and hydrodistillation times and the lowest drying temperature of leaves. Higher toxicity of the essential oil against S. zeamais was obtained by the use of ultrasound for its extraction. The identification and the relative percentage of the compounds of the essential oil were performed with a gas chromatograph coupled to a mass selective detector. The performance of the method was assessed by studying selectivity, linearity, limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ), precision and accuracy. The LOD and LOQ values for linalool were 2.19 and 6.62 µg mL−1 and for estragole 2.001 and 6.063 µg mL−1, respectively. The coefficients of determination (R2) were >0.99. The average recoveries ranged between 71 and 106%, with coefficient of variation ≤6.4%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/molecules25122781

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Classification based on volatile oil composition requires distillation and fractionation of oils, and chemotype classification based on only one major volatile oil is erroneous because one plant may contain two or more chemical compounds in nearly equal amounts.

    “Furthermore, classification based on volatile oil composition requires the distillation and fractionation of oils, and the chemotype classification based on only one major volatile oil is erroneous as one plant may contain two or more chemical compounds in nearly equal amounts [15,20,21].”

    From Comprehensive Metabolomic Fingerprinting Combined with Chemometrics Identifies Species- and Variety-Specific Variation of Medicinal Herbs: An Ocimum Study (2023) · cites this paper as [15]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [50]Mejri J. Aydib A. Abderrabbab M. Mejric M. Emerging extraction processes of essential oils: A review Asian J. Green Chem. 2015 1 22

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
da Silva Moura, E., D’Antonino Faroni, L. R., Fernandes Heleno, F., Aparecida Zinato Rodrigues, A., Figueiredo Prates, L. H., & Lopes Ribeiro de Queiroz, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Agricultural Engineering, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Department of Chemistry, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-06-16
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
2781
ISSN
1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034563797
Cited by
46
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
Keywords
Ocimum basilicum, basil essential oil, Sitophilus zeamais, stored grain pests, biopesticides, insecticidal activity, linalool, estragole, sonication time, GC-MS quantification
MeSH terms
Ultrasonic Waves, Animals, Coleoptera, Oils, Volatile, Pest Control, Biological, Ocimum basilicum, Biological Control Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review