Cited by 16Tactile and Sensory InteractionsDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesInteractive and Immersive Displays

Comparing interaction techniques to help blind people explore maps on small tactile devices

Open access
Simonnet, Mathieu, Brock, Anke M., Serpa, Antonio, Oriola, Bernard, Jouffrais, Christophe·2019·Multimodal Technologies and Interaction

Abstract

Exploring geographic maps on touchscreens is a difficult task in the absence of vision as those devices miss tactile cues. Prior research has therefore introduced non-visual interaction techniques designed to allow visually impaired people to explore spatial configurations on tactile devices. In this paper, we present a study in which six blind and six blindfolded sighted participants evaluated three of those interaction techniques compared to a screen reader condition. We observed that techniques providing guidance result in a higher user satisfaction and more efficient exploration. Adding a grid-like structure improved the estimation of distances. None of the interaction techniques improved the reconstruction of the spatial configurations. The results of this study allow improving the design of non-visual interaction techniques that support a better exploration and memorization of maps in the absence of vision.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/mti3020027

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simonnet, M., Brock, A. M., Serpa, A., Oriola, B., & Jouffrais, C.
Affiliations
  • Université de Bretagne Occidentale (FR)
  • École Nationale de l’Aviation Civile (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Simonnet, Mathieu
Venue
Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-04-20
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
27
ISSN
2414-4088 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2936075367
Cited by
16
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Multimodal Technologies and Interaction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-CE17-0018)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
Keywords
non-visual interaction, blind users, tactile maps, map exploration, touchscreen interaction, visually impaired people, screen readers, distance estimation, user satisfaction, accessibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review