Cited by 43Tactile and Sensory InteractionsDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesInteractive and Immersive Displays

Blind People Interacting with Large Touch Surfaces: Strategies for One-handed and Two-handed Exploration

Guerreiro, Tiago, Montague, Kyle, Guerreiro, João, Nunes, Rafael, Nicolau, Hugo, Gonçalves, Daniel J.V.·2015·Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces - ITS '15

Abstract

Interaction with large touch surfaces is still a relatively infant domain, particularly when looking at the accessibility solutions offered to blind users. Their smaller mobile counterparts are shipped with built-in accessibility features, enabling non-visual exploration of linearized screen content. However, it is unknown how well these solutions perform in large interactive surfaces that use more complex spatial content layouts. We report on a user study with 14 blind participants performing common touchscreen interactions using one and two-hand exploration. We investigate the exploration strategies applied by blind users when interacting with a tabletop. We identified six basic strategies that were commonly adopted and should be considered in future designs. We finish with implications for the design of accessible large touch interfaces.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2817721.2817743

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across multiple experiments, users also used techniques such as making crosses at vertices to locate connecting segments and scanning horizontally to find symmetry.

    “We have also aggregated shape and line exploration strategies observed across multiple experiments and found that users employed additional techniques including making crosses at vertex points to find connecting line segments (B) and scanning horizontally across the shape to uncover symmetry (C) [29,72].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guerreiro, T., Montague, K., Guerreiro, J., Nunes, R., Nicolau, H., & Gonçalves, D. J. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento (PT)
  • Instituto Superior Técnico (PT)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces - ITS '15
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
2015
Pages
25-34
OpenAlex
W2272692319
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS) (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (UID/CEC/00408/2013)
  • Research Councils UK (EP/G066019/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
Keywords
blind users, accessibility, tabletop interaction, touchscreen interaction, exploration strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review