The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
State-of-the-Art Review of Electrospun Gelatin-Based Nanofiber Dressings for Wound Healing Applications
Open accessAbstract
Electrospun nanofiber materials have been considered as advanced dressing candidates in the perspective of wound healing and skin regeneration, originated from their high porosity and permeability to air and moisture, effective barrier performance of external pathogens, and fantastic extracellular matrix (ECM) fibril mimicking property. Gelatin is one of the most important natural biomaterials for the design and construction of electrospun nanofiber-based dressings, due to its excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability, and great exudate-absorbing capacity. Various crosslinking approaches including physical, chemical, and biological methods have been introduced to improve the mechanical stability of electrospun gelatin-based nanofiber mats. Some innovative electrospinning strategies, including blend electrospinning, emulsion electrospinning, and coaxial electrospinning, have been explored to improve the mechanical, physicochemical, and biological properties of gelatin-based nanofiber mats. Moreover, numerous bioactive components and therapeutic agents have been utilized to impart the electrospun gelatin-based nanofiber dressing materials with multiple functions, such as antimicrobial, anti-inflammation, antioxidation, hemostatic, and vascularization, as well as other healing-promoting capacities. Noticeably, electrospun gelatin-based nanofiber mats integrated with specific functions have been fabricated to treat some hard-healing wound types containing burn and diabetic wounds. This work provides a detailed review of electrospun gelatin-based nanofiber dressing materials without or with therapeutic agents for wound healing and skin regeneration applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fabrication and characterization of chitosan‐gelatin blend nanofibers for skin tissue engineering
Dhandayuthapani, B., Krishnan, U. M., & Sethuraman, S. (2010) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31651 · Cited by 261
Cited by
Electrospinning: Processes, Structures, and Materials
Ahmadi Bonakdar, M., & Rodrigue, D. (2024) · Macromol · doi:10.3390/macromol4010004 · Cited by 380
Engineered Hemostatic Biomaterials for Sealing Wounds
Montazerian, H., Davoodi, E., Baidya, A., Baghdasarian, S., Sarikhani, E., Meyer, C. E., Haghniaz, R., Badv, M., Annabi, N., Khademhosseini, A., et al. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c01015 · Cited by 291
Li, T., Yin, W., Gao, S., Sun, Y., Xu, P., Wu, S., Kong, H., Yang, G., & Wei, G. (2022) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano12060982 · Cited by 222
Self-citationLi, K., Kabir, M., Rahman, M., & Chen, S. (2025) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2025.114251 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, T., Sun, M., & Wu, S.
- Venue
- Nanomaterials
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-02-25
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 784
- ISSN
- 2079-4991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4214496645
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: State-of-the-Art Review of Electrospun Gelatin-Based Nanofiber Dressings for Wound Healing Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/nano12050784
- The paper
- Li, T., Sun, M., & Wu, S. (2022). State-of-the-Art Review of Electrospun Gelatin-Based Nanofiber Dressings for Wound Healing Applications. Nanomaterials. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12050784
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.