Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 210 of the 210 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Engineered Hemostatic Biomaterials for Sealing Wounds

Montazerian, Hossein, Davoodi, Elham, Baidya, Avijit, Baghdasarian, Sevana, Sarikhani, Einollah, Meyer, Claire Elsa, Haghniaz, Reihaneh, Badv, Maryam, Annabi, Nasim, Khademhosseini, Ali, Weiss, Paul S.·2022·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

Hemostatic biomaterials show great promise in wound control for the treatment of uncontrolled bleeding associated with damaged tissues, traumatic wounds, and surgical incisions. A surge of interest has been directed at boosting hemostatic properties of bioactive materials via mechanisms triggering the coagulation cascade. A wide variety of biocompatible and biodegradable materials has been applied to the design of hemostatic platforms for rapid blood coagulation. Recent trends in the design of hemostatic agents emphasize chemical conjugation of charged moieties to biomacromolecules, physical incorporation of blood-coagulating agents in biomaterials systems, and superabsorbing materials in either dry (foams) or wet (hydrogel) states. In addition, tough bioadhesives are emerging for efficient and physical sealing of incisions. In this Review, we highlight the biomacromolecular design approaches adopted to develop hemostatic bioactive materials. We discuss the mechanistic pathways of hemostasis along with the current standard experimental procedures for characterization of the hemostasis efficacy. Finally, we discuss the potential for clinical translation of hemostatic technologies, future trends, and research opportunities for the development of next-generation surgical materials with hemostatic properties for wound management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c01015

Cites

210 of 210 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 210 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Montazerian, H., Davoodi, E., Baidya, A., Baghdasarian, S., Sarikhani, E., Meyer, C. E., Haghniaz, R., Badv, M., Annabi, N., Khademhosseini, A., & Weiss, P. S.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2022-06-22
Volume
122
Issue
15
Pages
12864-12903
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W4283274448
Cited by
291
References
210
FWCI
14.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineered Hemostatic Biomaterials for Sealing Wounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c01015
The paper
Montazerian, H., Davoodi, E., Baidya, A., Baghdasarian, S., Sarikhani, E., Meyer, C. E., Haghniaz, R., Badv, M., Annabi, N., Khademhosseini, A., & Weiss, P. S. (2022). Engineered Hemostatic Biomaterials for Sealing Wounds. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c01015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.