Cited by 12Photonic and Optical DevicesStrong Light-Matter InteractionsMechanical and Optical Resonators

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functionalized Optical Microcavities for Sensing Applications

Open access

Abstract

Functionalized optical microcavities constitute an emerging highly sensitive and highly selective sensing technology. By combining optical microcavities with novel materials, microcavity sensors offer exceptional precision, unlocking considerable potential for medical diagnostics, physical and chemical analyses, and environmental monitoring. The high capabilities of functionalized microcavities enable subwavelength light detection and manipulation, facilitating the precise detection of analytes. Furthermore, recent advancements in miniaturization have paved the way for their integration into portable platforms. For leveraging the potential of microcavity sensors, it is crucial to address challenges related to the need for increasing cost-effectiveness, enhancing selectivity and sensitivity, enabling real-time measurements, and improving fabrication techniques. New strategies include the use of advanced materials, the optimization of signal processing, hybrid design approaches, and the employment of artificial intelligence. This review outlines the key strategies toward enhancing the performance of optical microcavities, highlights their broad applicability across various fields, and discusses the challenges that should be overcome to unlock their full potential.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nano15030206

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 103 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Granizo, E., Samokhvalov, P., & Nabiev, I.
Affiliations
  • National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (RU)
  • Sechenov University (RU)
Corresponding author
Nabiev, Igor
Venue
Nanomaterials
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-01-27
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
206
ISSN
2079-4991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406911399
Cited by
12
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nanomaterials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Russian Science Foundation (23-75-30016)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Mechanical and Optical Resonators
Keywords
optical microcavities, optical sensing, subwavelength light manipulation, sensor sensitivity and selectivity, portable sensing platform, signal processing, medical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, fabrication techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review