The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preparation of Messenger RNA Nanomicelles via Non-Cytotoxic PEG-Polyamine Nanocomplex for Intracerebroventicular Delivery: A Proof-of-Concept Study in Mouse Models
Open accessAbstract
The specific delivery of messenger RNA (mRNA) is an excellent alternative to plasmid DNA, due to the latter’s potential risk for random integration into the host genome. In this study, we propose the use of specially tailored polyplex nanomicelles for the intravenous delivery of mRNA into the brain of mice. In brief, along the backbone of a polyaspartamide polymer that is terminated with a 42k Polyethylene glycol chain (PEG), aminoethylene-repeating groups (two, three, and four units, respectively) were conjugated to side-chains to promote electrostatic interactions with mRNA. This structural configuration would ultimately condense into a polyplex nanomicelle ranging between 24 and 34 nm, as was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) while the chemistry of the synthesis was validated through NMR analysis. Subsequently, we hypothesized an important correlation pertaining to the role of hydrogen bonding between the interaction of polyamine and mRNA in due course. As a proof of concept, we encapsulated the luciferase (Luc2) mRNA as a reporter gene through in vitro transcription (IVT) and subsequently infused the polyplex nanomicelles into mouse brains via an intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection to bypass the blood–brain barriers (BBB). Data revealed that PEGylated polyplex nanomicelles possessing four repeating units of aminoethylene groups had exhibited the best Luc2 mRNA delivery efficiency with no significant immune response registered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, drugs entrapped in micelles are protected from unexpected interactions and biodegradation in vivo environment, resulting in prolongation of the half-life and improved efficiency [49,50,51].”
From Recent Advances in Nanomicelles Delivery Systems. (2020) · cites this paper as [51]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design and development of polymers for gene delivery
Pack, D. W., Hoffman, A. S., Pun, S., & Stayton, P. S. (2005) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1775 · Cited by 2,568
Nanoparticle PEGylation for Imaging and Therapy
Jokerst, J. V., Lobovkina, T., Zare, R. N., & Gambhir, S. S. (2011) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm.11.19 · Cited by 2,113
Gref, R., Lück, M., Quellec, P., Marchand, M., Dellacherie, E., Harnisch, S., Blunk, T., & Müller, R. H. (2000) · Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/s0927-7765(99)00156-3 · Cited by 1,725
Synthetic DNA delivery systems
Luo, D., & Saltzman, W. M. (2000) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/71889 · Cited by 1,625
Endosomal escape pathways for delivery of biologicals
Varkouhi, A. K., Scholte, M., Storm, G., & Haisma, H. J. (2011) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.11.004 · Cited by 1,561
Holtkamp, S., Kreiter, S., Selmi, A., Simon, P., Koslowski, M., Huber, C., Türeci, O., & Sahin, U. (2006) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2006-04-015024 · Cited by 625
Recent advances in stealth coating of nanoparticle drug delivery systems
Amoozgar, Z., & Yeo, Y. (2012) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1002/wnan.1157 · Cited by 545
In vivo toxicity of cationic micelles and liposomes
Knudsen, K. B., Northeved, H., Ek, P. K., Permin, A., Gjetting, T., Andresen, T. L., Larsen, S., Wegener, K. M., Lykkesfeldt, J., Jantzen, K., et al. (2014) · Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2014.08.004 · Cited by 357
Uchida, H., Miyata, K., Oba, M., Ishii, T., Suma, T., Itaka, K., Nishiyama, N., & Kataoka, K. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja204466y · Cited by 216
pH-Triggered Reversible “Stealth” Polycationic Micelles
Gu, J., Cheng, W. P., Liu, J., Lo, S.-Y., Smith, D. S., Qu, X., & Yang, Z. (2007) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm701084w · Cited by 211
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Polymeric delivery systems for nucleic acid therapeutics: Approaching the clinic
van den Berg, A. I. S., Yun, C., Schiffelers, R. M., & Hennink, W. E. (2021) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.01.014 · Cited by 215
Recent Advances in Nanomicelles Delivery Systems.
Tawfik, S. M., Azizov, S., Elmasry, M. R., Sharipov, M., & Lee, Y.-I. (2020) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano11010070 · Cited by 156
The roles of polymers in mRNA delivery
Huang, P., Deng, H., Zhou, Y., & Chen, X. S. (2022) · Matter · doi:10.1016/j.matt.2022.03.006 · Cited by 131
The nano delivery systems and applications of mRNA
Li, M., Li, Y., Li, S., Jia, L., Wang, H., Li, M., Deng, J., Zhu, A., Ma, L., Li, W., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113910 · Cited by 127
Advances in mRNA non-viral delivery approaches
Ibba, M. L., Ciccone, G., Esposito, C. L., Catuogno, S., & Giangrande, P. H. (2021) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.113930 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, L. Y., Khung, Y. L., & Lin, C.-Y.
- Affiliations
- China Medical University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Khung, Yit Lung
- Lin, Chin-Yu
- Venue
- Nanomaterials
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-01-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67
- ISSN
- 2079-4991 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6359661
- OpenAlex
- W2908235105
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nanomaterials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (107-2314-B-039-023, 107-2622-E-039-003, 107-2113-M-039-002-MY2)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
- Keywords
- polyaspartamide, intracerebroventricular administration, blood-brain barrier bypass, mRNA delivery, luciferase reporter, hydrogen bonding, immune response
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
