Cited by 100

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trends in Ultra-Processed Food Purchases from 1984 to 2016 in Mexican Households

Marrón-Ponce, Joaquín Alejandro, Tolentino-Mayo, Lizbeth, Hernández-F, Mauricio, Batis, Carolina·2018·Nutrients

Abstract

Global trade agreements have shaped the food system in ways that alter the availability, accessibility, affordability, and desirability of ready-to-eat foods. We assessed the time trends of ultra-processed foods purchases in Mexican households from 1984 to 2016. Cross-sectional data from 15 rounds of the National Income and Expenditure Survey (1984, 1989, 1992, 1994, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2016) were analyzed. Food and beverage purchases collected in a daily record instrument (over seven days) were classified according to their degree of processing according to the NOVA food framework: (1) Unprocessed or minimally processed foods; (2) processed culinary ingredients; (3) processed foods; and (4) ultra-processed foods. From 1984 to 2016, the total daily energy purchased decreased from 2428.8 to 1875.4 kcal/Adult Equivalent/day, there was a decrease of unprocessed or minimally processed foods (from 69.8% to 61.4% kcal) and processed culinary ingredients (from 14.0% to 9.0% kcal), and an increase of processed foods (from 5.7% to 6.5% kcal) and ultra-processed foods (from 10.5% to 23.1% kcal). Given that ultra-processed foods purchases have doubled in the last three decades and unprocessed or minimally processed foods purchased have gradually declined, future strategies should promote the consumption of unprocessed or minimally processed foods, and discourage ultra-processed foods availability and accessibility in Mexico.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu11010045

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The energy contribution of UPFs to total household food purchases increased in Spain, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, China, South Korea, the USA, and the UK over recent decades.

    “The energy contribution of UPFs to total household food purchases nearly tripled in Spain 39 over three decades (11•0% to 31•7%), more than doubled in Canada 40 over eight decades (24•4% to 54•9%), and increased from 10% to 23% in Mexico 41 and Brazil 42 over four decades (figure 1).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Ludwig, 2008, Can the food industry play a constructive role in the obesity epidemic?, JAMA, 300, 1808, 10.1001/jama.300.15.1808 · DOI
  2. Monteiro, 2013, Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system, Obes. Rev., 14, 21, 10.1111/obr.12107 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Moubarac, 2017, Consumption of ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada, Appetite, 108, 512, 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.006 · DOI
  4. Louzada, 2017, The share of ultra-processed foods determines the overall nutritional quality of diets in Brazil, Public Health Nutr., 21, 94, 10.1017/S1368980017001434 · DOI
  5. Cediel, 2017, Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in Chilean diet (2010), Public Health Nutr., 21, 125, 10.1017/S1368980017001161 · DOI
  6. Louzada, 2017, Energy contribution of NOVA food groups and sociodemographic determinants of ultra-processed foods consumption in Mexican Population, Public Health Nutr., 21, 87
  7. Baraldi, 2018, Consumption of ultra-processed foods and associated sociodemographic factors in the USA between 2007 and 2012: Evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study, BMJ Open, 8, e020574, 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574 · DOI
  8. Monteiro, 2017, The UN Decade of Nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing, Public Health Nutr., 21, 5, 10.1017/S1368980017000234 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Pimenta, 2016, Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of overweight and obesity: The University of Navarra Follow-Up (SUN) cohort study, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 104, 1433, 10.3945/ajcn.116.135004 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Rauber, 2015, Consumption of ultra-processed food products and its effects on children’s lipid profiles: A longitudinal study, Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis., 25, 116, 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.08.001 · DOI
  11. Pahua, 2016, Panorama epidemiológico de México, principales causas de morbilidad y mortalidad, Rev. Fac. Med., 59, 8
  12. Food and Nutrition Board (1989). Recommended Dietary Allowances, Subcommittee on the 10th Edition of the RDAs.
  13. Martins, 2013, Increased contribution of ultra-processed food products in the Brazilian diet (1987–2009), Rev. Saude Publica, 47, 656, 10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047004968 · DOI
  14. Moubarac, 2014, Time trends in the consumption of processed and ultra-processed food and drink products between 1938 and 2011 in Canada, Can. J. Diet. Pract. Res., 75, 15, 10.3148/75.1.2014.15 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Latada, P., Louzada, M.L.D.C., Maritnes-Steele, E., and Monteiro, C.A. (2017). Added sugar and ultra-processed foods in Spanish households (1990–2010). Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Monteiro, 2018, Household availability of ultra-processed foods and obesity in nineteen European countries, Public Health Nutr., 21, 18, 10.1017/S1368980017001379 · DOI
  17. Baker, 2016, Food systems transformations, ultra-processed food markets and the nutrition transition in Asia, Glob. Health, 12, 80, 10.1186/s12992-016-0223-3 · DOI
  18. Popkin, 2018, Obesity and the food system transformation in Latin America, Obes. Rev., 19, 1028, 10.1111/obr.12694 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Camberos-Castro, M., and Bracamontes Nevárez, J. (2015). Las Crisis Económicas y sus Efectos en el Mercado de Trabajo, en la Desigualdad y en la Pobreza de México, UNAM. · DOI
  20. Clark, 2012, Exporting Obesity. U.S. Farm and Trade Policy is transforming the Mexican food environment, Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health, 18, 53, 10.1179/1077352512Z.0000000007 · DOI
  21. 2014, El comercio moderno: Un vector que dinamiza el sistema alimentario en México, Revista de Economía del Caribe, 13, 1
  22. Djupegot, I.L., Nenseth, C.B., Bere, E., Torgeirsdotter-Bjornara, H.B., Helland, S.H., Overby, N.C., Torstveit, M.K., and Stea, T.H. (2017). The association between time scarcity, sociodemographic correlates and consumption of ultra-processed foods among parents in Norway: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 17. · DOI
  23. Colchero, 2017, In Mexico, evidence of sustained consumer response two years after implementing a sugar-sweetened beverage tax, Health Aff., 36, 564, 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1231 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Batis, C., Rivera, J.A., Popkin, B.M., and Taillie, L.S. (2016). First-year evaluation of Mexico’s tax on nonessential energy-dense foods: An observational study. PLoS Med., 13. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Marrón-Ponce, J. A., Tolentino-Mayo, L., Hernández-F, M., & Batis, C.
Affiliations
  • Center for Nutrition and Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca 62100, Morelos, Mexico
  • CONACYT-Center for Nutrition and Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca 62100, Morelos, Mexico
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-12-26
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
45
ISSN
2072-6643
Cited by
100
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review